Voting in new IPMC members

Hi, I was looking at the IPMC policy on addd new IPMC members [1] and noticed something odd it states: "Individuals may be nominated to join the IPMC after a vote which passes with more than 3/4 of those voting.” Anyone know the history of this? It seem to come from this thread [2]. That

Re: [VOTE] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

+1 Craig > On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call > a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full > proposal is available on the wiki: >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ShardingSphereProposal >

[VOTE] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

Hi! on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available on the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ShardingSphereProposal and it is also attached below for your convenience. Please cast your vote: [ ]

Re: [DISCUSS] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

Seems like we have a general consensus on this -- so lets start a formal vote. Thanks, Roman. On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 6:33 AM Xin Wang wrote: > > +1 no-binding > Sharing-Sphere is a awesmome relational database middleware. It's great for > it to be incubated in Apache community. > > 彭勇升 Peng

Re: Draft email to member list to try and recruit some new mentors

Hi, > I am not a member. PMC of Hadoop. Still I would like to help here if any > possible. Anyone can help out with mentoring duties and do the same job, it’s just not official (whatever that means) unless you are an IPMC member. So if you want to do it just go and do it. Alternatively you

Re: Draft email to member list to try and recruit some new mentors

Hi, I am not a member. PMC of Hadoop. Still I would like to help here if any possible. Please do let me know. -Vinay On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, 4:32 am Justin Mclean HI, > > Update of draft email below, if there no further feedback I’ll send this > out is a few days. > > -- >

Re: Some early stage questions

> On 5 Nov 2018, at 19:31, Jacques Basaldúa wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to formulate a proposal to the ASF incubator. After spending > some time browsing the website, I still have a few novice questions I wish to > share with you. > > 1.

Re: Some early stage questions

Hi Jacques, Welcome to the Apache Incubator. > On Nov 5, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Jacques Basaldúa wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to formulate a proposal to the ASF incubator. After spending > some time browsing the website, I still have a few novice questions I wish to > share with

Some early stage questions

Hi everyone, I would like to formulate a proposal to the ASF incubator. After spending some time browsing the website, I still have a few novice questions I wish to share with you. 1. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html states: "Before starting on the formal proposal, recruit a

Champion Role is Only to Get a Podling Started

Hi Everyone, but especially mentors. I saw this email from a mentor on the Airflow dev list: [1] "The big list that *has* to be filled out and correct is here: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/airflow.html This is usually done by the

[VOTE] Ratis-thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

IPMC, Please vote on the following release candidate to become Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0. You may find the PPMC VOTE thread at https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/000d9c6f69b6ddcda5391134df8666c7df83193dd01b97218579069c@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E, with the RESULT at

[DISCUSS] Iceberg proposal for incubation

Hi everyone, I'd like to start a discussion about moving Netflix's Iceberg project to the incubator. Iceberg is a library and specification for tracking data files that store table data in the big data ecosystem. Iceberg is designed to guarantee snapshot isolation and improve on performance

Re: How widely read is the incubator report?

I normally do not read the entire report, but I will take up the point, I should so. It could definitively give my PPMC and myself more ideas and good input ;-) How about (just an idea ;-) create a mailing-list, where people can subscribe for getting informed monthly on all there reports

Re: How widely read is the incubator report?

I typically read the submitted version. I am still ramping up on how I can help the incubator but will make a point of reading them. On Sat, Nov 3, 2018, 6:19 PM Justin Mclean Hi, > > > I read the entire report every month. Then again, I'm a director so I'm > > supposed to. > > :-) > > > I'd

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi, On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:25:51 +1100 Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part of the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi, > Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part of > the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and > can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this out in > the README? We don't want to duplicate

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi Justin, Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part of the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this out in the README? We don't want to duplicate

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi Justin, I believe technically it is a), so I will leave it as is for now. Thanks, Jonas On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:38:05 +1100 Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Correct, the copyright headers were removed. Previously the copyright was part of the NOTICE file however we removed it after you

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi, > Correct, the copyright headers were removed. Previously the copyright was > part of the NOTICE file however we removed it after you pointed out that it > does not belong there: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRAIL-33 Right I had forgotten about that. IMO If depends on if the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi, On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:15:41 +1100 Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, It is signed with an Apache email address: $ gpg --verify apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 2018 12:50:58 PM CEST

Re: Request for write access of podling report wiki

Thanks for your reminder, I have created an account: "Hanks" and my email is "zhanghan...@gmail.com". I hope you can grant me the write permission. Thanks, Hanks Nick Burch 于2018年11月5日周一 下午6:49写道： > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Hanks Zhang wrote: > > I am a committer of Weex project, I want to update

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Justin Mclean wrote: Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:15:41 +0100 From: Justin Mclean To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3] It is signed with an Apache email address: $ gpg --verify

Re: Request for write access of podling report wiki

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Hanks Zhang wrote: I am a committer of Weex project, I want to update the podling report of Weex in [1] but found have no permission to do it. Could someone grant me the write assess of this podling report wiki file? Thanks a lot. The incubator wiki doesn't use the main

Re: Request for write access of podling report wiki

My Apache id is: hanks Thanks again. Hanks Zhang 于2018年11月5日周一 下午6:41写道： > Hi, > > I am a committer of Weex project, I want to update the podling report of > Weex in [1] but found have no permission to do it. > > Could someone grant me the write assess of this podling report wiki file? > Thanks

Request for write access of podling report wiki

Hi, I am a committer of Weex project, I want to update the podling report of Weex in [1] but found have no permission to do it. Could someone grant me the write assess of this podling report wiki file? Thanks a lot. [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2018 Best Regards, Hanks

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi, > It is signed with an Apache email address: > > $ gpg --verify apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc > gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz' > gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 2018 12:50:58 PM CEST using RSA key ID AA557B11 > gpg: Good signature from

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi all, Thanks again for voting on Apache Crail 1.1-incubating rc3. I'm canceling the vote due to found issues. We will prepare a new release candidate to address the issues. Thanks, Jonas On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:32:05 +0100 "Jonas Pfefferle" wrote: Hi Luciano, Thanks for your vote.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi Luciano, Thanks for your vote. We will prepare another release to address the problems with the binary release. Jonas On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:42:38 -0800 Luciano Resende wrote: If the podling decide to release only the source artifacts I would be +1 (binding) for that as Justin and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi Justin, Thanks for your vote. Some comments inline. Jonas On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:04:22 +1100 Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the binary. Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the source artefact. I checked: -