bdelacretaz opened a new pull request #12: Rework the homepage as discussed in
'overzealous bureaucracy' thread
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/12
I have reworked the homepage to express the Incubator's mission as providing
services to podlings, as opposed to the current text
Hi,
As discussed in the "overzealous bureaucracy" thread, I suggest
changing the text on the http://incubator.apache.org/ homepage to
present the Incubator as a service provider for podlings.
I think the current description can be understood as the Incubator
being a"stern gatekeeper to the ASF" a
That sounds good to me (the general idea at least).
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 1:12 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in the "overzealous bureaucracy" thread, I suggest
> changing the text on the http://incubator.apache.org/ homepage to
> present the Incubator as a service prov
Hi,
I'm the author of CUB, and in particular, [9] (half.h) below.
>> but what about the last one [9]?
The boilerplate no-redistribution license at top of half.h was an oversight; it
should read the same as the BSD-style headers for the rest of CUB's source
files. (It was cribbed from an internal
Agreed. I think some of the conversation on that thread was likely polarizing
and heated and my hope is that it isn't continued in this thread (whether it
was self-justified as being "ham-handed" or not).
> On Jul 18, 2019, at 4:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in
Hey Justin,
Thanks for your comments.
The other repos under https://github.com/druid-io contain projects loosely
affiliated with Apache Druid but that are not seen as part of the core
project. Some of them have ongoing discussions about whether the community
wants to migrate them to Apache (as su
Dear IPMC members,
Thank you for all the help in spotting the license issues. Given that they are
relatively minor we would like to address them in the next release.
Since there is no longer any blocker, it would be great if you could continue
to vote on this release. We still need one more vot
Hi all,
The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Tuweni
0.8.1.
This release includes the following changes:
* Exclude gradle wrapper jar from source distribution
* Remove binary jar file from testing resources, recreating on the fly instead
* Adding a stage task to aut
jvz commented on a change in pull request #12: Rework the homepage as discussed
in 'overzealous bureaucracy' thread
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/12#discussion_r305074198
##
File path: pages/index.ad
##
@@ -1,37 +1,52 @@
-= Apache Incubator
+= The Apache In
jvz commented on a change in pull request #12: Rework the homepage as discussed
in 'overzealous bureaucracy' thread
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/12#discussion_r305074357
##
File path: pages/index.ad
##
@@ -1,37 +1,52 @@
-= Apache Incubator
+= The Apache In
Hi, there,
Currently I am leading a team to develop an inventory management system for
Internet advertising, we would like to apply Apache incubation for this project.
Can you please help me on this? And is it possible to have a mentor to help on
the application?
Regards,
Xun Hu,
Chief Archi
Hi
I should you could send an introduction of the project. Then, we could see
whether people get interests.
Is it already open sourced?
Sheng Wu
Apache Skywalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
> 在 2019年7月19日，上午3:21，Xun Hu 写道：
>
> Hi, there,
>
> Currently I am leading a team to develop an invento
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- Signatures and checksum look good
- DISCLAIMER exists
Thanks,
-Jason
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:53 AM Sheng Zha wrote:
> Dear IPMC members,
>
> Thank you for all the help in spotting the license issues. Given that they
> are relatively minor we
Hi,
+1 (binding) However note the image issues below, I'll leave it up to the
project if they think it's OK to distribute these files or want to create a new
release.
I checked:
- includbatibng in name
- signature and hashes correct
- NOTICE copyright don’t include current year ("2017 and onwar
Dear community,
I'm happy to announce the results of the vote.
This vote passes with 4 +1 votes (4 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 votes
* Paul King / binding
* Michael Wall / binding
* Justin Mclean / binding
* Jason Dai / binding
0 votes
* No votes
-1 votes
* No votes
Vote thread can be f
Thank you very much for voting, I have sent out the result.[1]
I think it's best to remove or replace those images, I have summarized all
license issues on GitHub to track and resolve before next release.[2]
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/89c17ab4a14f9004dc5ad96f07f28ac79f95f5fc9c593926c
+1
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:54 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Agreed. I think some of the conversation on that thread was likely
> polarizing and hea
17 matches
Mail list logo
