Thanks Greg, I am fully in support of your position here.
The ASF is supposed to make it easier for developers to develop. It is not
supposed to be creating red tape to guard the entrance to the hallowed halls.
Ross
From: Greg Stein
Sent: Sunday,
See further below for an unfortunately trimmed thread. A couple paragraphs
that I wrote early-thread are important to add:
Option (F): stop calling them official ASF releases, which means PMC votes
are not required.
> In that case voting would not be required and they wouldn’t have to
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:32 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I see no problem with using our infrastructure to distribute F/OSS
> > materials. Why would the Foundation want to be against that? If it is
> > labeled properly, then ... roll with it.
>
> It often isn’t labelled properly.
Hi,
> I see no problem with using our infrastructure to distribute F/OSS
> materials. Why would the Foundation want to be against that? If it is
> labeled properly, then ... roll with it.
It often isn’t labelled properly. There’s a reasonable risk that some of what
would be placed there and
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 5:29 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote: (dunno why Justin keeps trimming sources for his quotes...)
> > Option (F): stop calling them official ASF releases, which means PMC
> votes
> > are not required.
>
> In that case voting would not be required and they
