Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Hi, > Looks for copyrights inside the files, file with ASF header should have no > copyright lines. Well ones donated to the ASF anyway. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For add

Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Hi, > for ./3rdparty/compiler-rt/builtin_fp16.h , from > [here](https://github.com/llvm-mirror/compiler-rt/blob/master/LICENSE.TXT#L240-L241 > > ) > it says it was dual licensed under University of Illinois and the MIT

Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Re LLVM’s license issue. I believe MIT is a safer choice for compiler-rt before we confirm with ASF. Because strictly LLVM’s apache license comes with an exemption Clause which needs to be reviewed. Given that the code is also dual licensed under MIT, we should take that as a safer choice until we

Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Hi Justin, for ./3rdparty/compiler-rt/builtin_fp16.h , from [here](https://github.com/llvm-mirror/compiler-rt/blob/master/LICENSE.TXT#L240-L241) it says it was dual licensed under University of Illinois and the MIT license, though the current LICENSE file declares ALv2. I believe the builtin_fp16.

Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Thanks Justin for helping, we'll make modification accordingly. On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 2:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I checked the release candidate further: > - Signatures and hashes good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE is missing a few things > - NOTICE needs some minor adjustment

Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Hi, I checked the release candidate further: - Signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is missing a few things - NOTICE needs some minor adjustments - Some files are missing ASF headers e.g. [1][2][3][4][5] (+ others) - Some files incorrectly have an ASF headers or have ASF lines

Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Thanks Justin! This is exactly kind of feedback we are looking for. The community would like to hold the release to the highest possible standard, which means we would like to make sure the release meet the criteria of the standard disclaimer. We will look into the compatibility issue of LLVM lice

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX (incubating) 0.9

Hi, all, Release vote for Release Apache APISIX (Incubating) 0.9 has PASSED and closed now. The results are as follows: 3 IPMC +1 votes: - Justin Mclean - Willem Jiang - Kevin Ratnasekera 1 non-binding +1 vote: - Yuansheng Wang Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1ac4ef82541eab58d

Re: Help Verify Apache(incubating) TVM Release RC

Hi, I’ve not had an extensive look but I note this license in your license file: LLVM Release License While a BSD style license (I think) it not listen in Apaches list of compatible licenses. You’ll also note it include other 3rd party licensed buts of software, these would need to be checked i