Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.3-incubating Release Candidate 8

2020-12-07 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, -1 (binding) due to license and notice issues I checked: - incubating in name - LICENSE has issues (see below) - NOTICE has wrong year - DISCLAIMER exists (not WIP one) - no unexpected binary files - ASF files have ASF headers I’m a little confused by the LICENSE file. First off it uses

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Sudarshan Vasudevan
Thanks Justin! This vote thread has been sent twice by mistake. So, please consider this duplicate thread closed, and continue voting on the other email thread. We will consolidate any votes sent on this thread with the other at the vote closure. Best, Sudarshan

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Might be best to close this one and ask people to vote in the other thread for less confusion. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
Yes :) Abhishek On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:38 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Is this the same as the other vote thread? > > Thanks, > Justin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Is this the same as the other vote thread? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - No unexpected binary files in release - All files have ASF headers - I was not able to compile at first but managed to get (see below) This is the error I get when building via ./gradlew build:

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.3-incubating Release Candidate 8

2020-12-07 Thread H W
Carrying over my +1 Do we need two more binding +1, or just normal +1? On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:03 PM Josh Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > We need two more votes on this RC if anyone has the time. > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 12:05 PM Josh Fischer wrote: > > > Thank you, Dave. We need two more votes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 07:35, Sudarshan Vasudevan wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 (Incubating). > > The source release candidate RC2 can be downloaded here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.3-incubating Release Candidate 8

2020-12-07 Thread Josh Fischer
Hi, We need two more votes on this RC if anyone has the time. On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 12:05 PM Josh Fischer wrote: > Thank you, Dave. We need two more votes if anyone has the time! > > - Josh > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 11:42 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Carrying over my +1 (binding) >> >> Sent

Re: [incubator-pinot] Migrate LinkedIn internal CI pipeline from Travis CI to Github Actions

2020-12-07 Thread John D. Ament
Hi, I would suggest that you get in touch with someone from the Apache Pinot team to get this coordinated. One of their PPMC or mentors should help get this moving with Apache Infra to get resolved. John On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:22 PM Jialiang Li wrote: > Hi community, > > This is Jack from

Re: [incubator-pinot] Migrate LinkedIn internal CI pipeline from Travis CI to Github Actions

2020-12-07 Thread Daniel B. Widdis
Someone needs to have "Admin" access to the repository. Most committers just have "Write" access. I would suggest filing an Issue at the repository stating these requirements. On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:22 PM Jialiang Li wrote: > Hi community, > > This is Jack from LinkedIn Pinot team. We’re

[VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Sudarshan Vasudevan
Hi, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 (Incubating). The source release candidate RC2 can be downloaded here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gobblin/apache-gobblin-incubating-0.15.0-rc2/ The artifacts (i.e. JARs) corresponding to this release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding) Incubating in name, Signatures, Checksums, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, LICENSE, Rat Check using Gradle, Rat Check not using Gradle, Build using Gradle. I noticed that the rat gradle excludes may be too many. Gradle RAT did not slag the MIT code (that I saw, I could have missed something

[incubator-pinot] Migrate LinkedIn internal CI pipeline from Travis CI to Github Actions

2020-12-07 Thread Jialiang Li
Hi community, This is Jack from LinkedIn Pinot team. We’re currently thinking of migrating our existing internal publication pipeline from travis CI to github actions, but it seems none of our committers has the permission to add the secret key to the public repo. Could anyone help guide how

[VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Sudarshan Vasudevan
Hi, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 (Incubating). The source release candidate RC2 can be downloaded here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gobblin/apache-gobblin-incubating-0.15.0-rc2/ The artifacts (i.e. JARs) corresponding to this release candidate

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Nemo (incubating) version 0.3.rc1

2020-12-07 Thread Won Wook SONG
The mailing list can be found at: this link ! Wonook 2020년 12월 7일 (월) 오후 11:32, Won Wook SONG 님이 작성: > Hi all, > > I'm happy to announce that the

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Nemo (incubating) version 0.3.rc1

2020-12-07 Thread Won Wook SONG
Hi all, I'm happy to announce that the vote passes with 3 +1 binding votes, with no 0 or -1 votes. Binding votes: Markus Weimer Byung-Gon Chun Dave Fisher Thanks to everyone who took their time to vote! Best, Wonook

AW: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

2020-12-07 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Bernd, I just didn't want to leave the impression, that "we're full". So if anyone here would be interested in joining, he/she is more than welcome. I know that 3 is enough, but I also have seen that when starting with 3 initial mentors, usually 1 or 2 get lost some time after the

Re: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

2020-12-07 Thread Bernd Fondermann
+1 If three mentors for Wayang are not enough (I'm one of them), how much would a incubating project need? Bernd On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 12:43 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Right now, there are 3 people signed up as mentors, however knowing that > not always are all mentors available at