Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.0 [ROUND 2]

Hi Sheng, > If there is nothing checked by them, it is hard to say they could be > counted as a binding(PPMC level) vote. I would be glad to change the result from 12 +1 votes to 6 +1 votes if the rest 6 votes are invalid. Before that, I'd like to make sure whether the rest 6 votes are invalid or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.0 [ROUND 2]

Hi, It’s recommend that (P)PMC members write down what they check when voting, but you will see some variation from project to project on this and some TLP don’t do this at all. It also recommended that you encourage your mentors to vote and get mentor votes on your releases, but it’s not a req

Re: [MENTORS] Report timeline for August

Hi Justin, Pinot graduated so it seems you will need to remove it from the report. No one has updated podlings.xml to indicate the graduation. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content podlings.xml: Pinot is a distributed columnar storage engine that can ing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc4

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked signatures, built using “./mvnw clean install -DskipTests" and Java 8 on Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS. Followed build instructions in README.md. Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER; ran RAT. Note: It’s nothing to do with this release, but before you go 1.0 I think you sh

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-268) More Fully Move to Git

Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-268: - Summary: More Fully Move to Git Key: INCUBATOR-268 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-268 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Task C

[WEBSITE] More Fully Move to Git

Hi - See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-268 I plan to complete the move of many of the files that are maintained by projects into an ASF-Pelican workflow like I recently completed for www.apache.org and other websites including httpd.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc4

+1 ( binding ) I checked the following. - Incubating in name. - PGP Signatures. - SHA512 Checksums. - DISCLAIMER exists. - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine. - Maven Build passes on MacOS. ( Maven - 3.6.3 JAVA - AdoptOpenJDK Java 1.8.0_252 ). Regards Kevin On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:31 AM Juli

[GitHub] [incubator] dave2wave merged pull request #97: add xlst and converted files

dave2wave merged pull request #97: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/97 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.0

If you start another round of releases, please cancel the vote first. it could be better to use rc2 name to specify the release candidate to avoid this situation. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 4:03 PM Zhang Yonglun wrote: > > This vote thread is cancel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.0 [ROUND 2]

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin -

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.0

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NTOICE are good - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary fils - Can compile from source You might want to check the license of this file [1] as the contents may no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING

Hi, -1 (binding) as package is missing DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE. I can also see that chardet is still a LGPL Category X dependancy. I checked: - incubating in name - disclaimer is missing - no LICENSE or NOTICE file - no binary files - all source files have ASF headers - can compile/instal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.0 [ROUND 2]

+1 (non-binding) from me, I have checked the following items: - Incubating in name - LICENSE and NOTICE is fine - DISCLAIMER exists - All links are valid - No unexpected binary files - All ASF files have ASF headers - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. - No compiled archives bundled in source

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.0

+1 (non-binding) from me, I have checked the following items: - Incubating in name - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - All download links are valid - All ASF files have ASF headers - No binaries in source packaging - Source compiled Best regards Xun Liu On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING

Hi Justin, You are right, something went wrong with the packaging of the tag I created (and placed in SVN). i.e. you can see all the files you mentioned below are correctly in the tag here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/releases/tag/0.0.3rc4-incubating Re LGPL issue it is in the DIS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING

Ok that explains the gap as I checked on the tag. I guess you can update the artifacts based on the tag and update the vote thread. Regards JB > Le 5 août 2021 à 08:01, Lior Schachter a écrit : > > Hi Justin, > You are right, something went wrong with the packaging of the tag I created > (a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING

Thank you JB. I've uploaded the fixed files to SVN (repackaged existing tag) : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/liminal/0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: apache-liminal-0.0.3rc4-incubating-source.tar.gz: 1BC663C2 6317E840 3292B7BE E2023011 EE0DBAD8

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING

IMO regardless of whether or not you recreate rc4 or create rc5 all previous votes evaluated a prior package. I think you it's best to restart the VOTE on your dev list. Sorry, I know it’s not fun. The point is that everyone has voted on the exact same artifacts. Voting on GitHub tags is a prob

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING

Hi Lior, no my point is that you should cancel RC4 and create a new vote based on the same RC4 tag but with updated artifacts. Sorry about that, Regards JB On 05/08/2021 08:39, Lior Schachter wrote: Thank you JB. I've uploaded the fixed files to SVN (repackaged existing tag) : https://dist.