Carrying over my +1 vote from
https://lists.apache.org/thread/om585kyt94loncslvf2cfckdzvbo80ow
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:51 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating)
> Persistence Cassandra version 1.0.0-RC1.
>
> The disc
+1(binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE files exist.
[x] NOTICE is included.
[x] DISCLAIMER is included.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] All source files have license headers if necessary.
Bes
Hello Incubator Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating)
Persistence Cassandra version 1.0.0-RC1.
The discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/bqhqr1qjps71y5fdjxcyn6c65fdz633z
The Pekko PPMC vote thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/tf2tp86lhfqzqqkr2
Hi
+1(binding)
Here is what I checked:
- The checksums and signatures are validated.
- The LICENSE and NOTICE files look good to me.
- There is a DISCLAIMER file about incubating.
- No binary files in the source release.
@Xuanwo
I just found out the PPMC vote started yesterday. We must wait 72
h
Cancel this vote because of the license issue. See details in the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8v4wy5o132rpsjync6465zztgjlf6h5p
Thanks to all who participated in the vote, I’m going to fix the issue and
prepare the next RC ASAP.
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
-
Thanks for the advice, will update soon.
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
> On Sep 19, 2023, at 20:11, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> I think it would be simpler to use the standard protobuf license. Just
> one file, including its copyright.
>
> https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/LICENSE
>
> On T
I think it would be simpler to use the standard protobuf license. Just
one file, including its copyright.
https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/LICENSE
On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 12:45, Cheng Pan wrote:
>
> PJ Fanning, both LICENSE-BSD-3.txt and LICENSE-BSD-3.txt are applied to
> p
PJ Fanning, both LICENSE-BSD-3.txt and LICENSE-BSD-3.txt are applied to
protobuf-java, it was mentioned at the end of
client-spark/spark-3-shaded/LICENSE, please let me know if you have a better
idea of how to document clearly.
> BSD 3-clause
> See license/LICENSE-BSD-3.txt for details.
>
Thanks, Duo, will have a try.
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
> On Sep 19, 2023, at 19:30, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>
> I checked the pom for spark-3-shaded
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/blob/main/client-spark/spark-3-shaded/pom.xml
>
> You could try adding these transformers to the shade p
I'll have a look around to see if there are other issues.
With the BSD license mentioned in the client-spark/spark-3-shaded
LICENSE, could it be adjusted to say which libs it applies to?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/blob/main/client-spark/spark-3-shaded/src/main/resources/META-INF
I checked the pom for spark-3-shaded
https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/blob/main/client-spark/spark-3-shaded/pom.xml
You could try adding these transformers to the shade plugin to see if it helps
false
Cheng Pan 于2023年9月19日周二 19:17写道：
>
> Hi PJ Fanning,
>
> Thanks
Hi PJ Fanning,
Thanks for pointing out this issue, it was considered but seems broken
recently, unfortunately.
The proposed NOTICE and LICENSE files are under [1], would you mind taking a
look? If it's OK, I’m going to investigate and fix the packaging issue then.
Given it’s a license issue, I
I have some concerns over the jars that are part of the release.
I looked at celeborn-client-spark-3-shaded_2.12-0.3.1-incubating.jar in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1039/org/apache/celeborn/celeborn-client-spark-3-shaded_2.12/0.3.1-incubating/
The jar has
Amazing! Thanks :)
Em ter., 19/09/2023 às 10:23, Xuanwo escreveu:
> > Oh, you are correct. I just wanted to give the credits of everyone who
> > voted.
> > Next time I will only present the IPMCs.
>
> Hi, it's Ok to list everyone who voted, but should add comments about
> binding or non-binding.
Makes sense, we should use the same version to build dyn libs for all bindings.
I will start a issue to track this.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, at 17:23, Zili Chen wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] DISCLAIMER f
+1 (binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] DISCLAIMER file exists
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source (opendal-java) and test passed.
One suggestion here: Is it possible to pin a Rust version for a spec
> Oh, you are correct. I just wanted to give the credits of everyone who
> voted.
> Next time I will only present the IPMCs.
Hi, it's Ok to list everyone who voted, but should add comments about binding
or non-binding.
For example:
I am happy to inform you that the release voting has passed wit
Hi Daniel!
Oh, you are correct. I just wanted to give the credits of everyone who
voted.
Next time I will only present the IPMCs.
Thanks for the advice!
Gláucia
Em seg., 18/09/2023 às 21:30, Daniel Gruno escreveu:
> On 2023-09-18 15:20, Gláucia Esppenchutz wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I
18 matches
Mail list logo
