Hi,
I have been following the Seata project for years and have witnessed
the project's growth. I am glad to see Seata joining the apache
community, and happy to be mentor of the seata project to help seata
going through the incubation process.
I have a question about the initial comitters.
Carry my non-binding +1 vote from OpenDAL community.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023, at 15:30, Suyan wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> OpenDAL(incubating) 0.41.0-rc.1. We would like to request the IPMC members
> to review and vote
Yes; unfortunately, the concept of binding votes is one that you need to know.
If and when Baremaps has graduated as a top-level project, the votes of
Baremaps PMC members will be binding, but for the sake of inclusion and quality
you will want as many votes as possible from other community
+1 (binding)
I checked
- Files have the word incubating in their name.
- Checksums and signatures are valid.
- DISCLAIMER,LICENSE and NOTICE files exist.
- No Unexpected Binary Files in source release.
- The LICENSE file looks good to me.
Cheng Pan 于2023年10月7日周六 13:29写道：
> Hi IPMC,
>
> This is
+1 (nonbinding), I have checked:
[✓] The checksums and signatures are validated
[✓] The LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
[✓] DISCLAIMER is present
[✓] No binary files in the source release
[✓] incubating in the name
[✓] Built from source with make-distribution.sh
Kent Yao
On 2023/10/12 10:22:46
Carrying over +1 vote from
https://lists.apache.org/thread/s53trdc7prq3406jx64wo1rq4nbbkv63
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:15 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating)
> gRPC version 1.0.1-RC1.
>
> The discussion thread:
>
+1 binding
Checked sigs and sums: Matched
LICENSE and NOTICE: OK
DISCLAIMER: In place
Built from source:
‘./build/make-distribution.sh --release -Pflink-1.17’, successfully
generated the tarball
Run UTs:
'./build/mvn test -Pflink-1.17', passed
Thanks.
Willem Jiang 于2023年10月12日周四 15:32写道：
>
Thanks a lot for the clarification, we will eventually get familiar with the
process
> On 11 Oct 2023, at 21:02, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Note that 3 of those +1s (me, Calvin, JB) are binding because they are
> Incubator PMC members, 2 are not (Bertil, Leonard).
>
> 3 binding +1s is
Hello Incubator Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating)
gRPC version 1.0.1-RC1.
The discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/tlmk742qvm0tlfmk3o24cch41mtpwnx7
The Pekko PPMC vote result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/jsntxyy7wo5om0tqlp7rxzmz8oodt8pt
+1 binding.
- incubating in the release kit name
- The checksums and signatures are validated.
- The LICENSE and NOTICE files look good to me.
- There is a DISCLAIMER in the release kits
- No binary files in the source release kits
- I can build the source with the command
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache
OpenDAL(incubating) 0.41.0-rc.1. We would like to request the IPMC members
to review and vote for this release.
OpenDAL is a data access layer that allows users to easily and efficiently
retrieve data
Hi Incubator PMC,
Because of missing version in the last vote mail's subject, the last
vote has been canceled.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
The last vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2y0t7zdjcgmhb3pcztdohxd3kmnn0jrc
Sincerely,
Suyan
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache
OpenDAL(incubating) 0.41.0-rc.1. We would like to request the IPMC members
to review and vote for this release.
OpenDAL is a data access layer that allows users to easily and efficiently
retrieve data
Sure, please remove them [I do not have write access to the wiki]. Thank
you kindly.
---
Best Regards,
Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
Associate Professor
Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
Department of Computer Science
University of California, Davis
ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
ResilientDB:
I suggest removing them since it is leading to confusion.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:27 PM Mohammad Sadoghi
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> As for the question of the “Broader Contributing Members”, they do not
> qualify as initial committers as they have provided feedback / contributed
> on the
Dear all,
As for the question of the “Broader Contributing Members”, they do not
qualify as initial committers as they have provided feedback / contributed
on the broader scope of ResilientDB, so we suggest either removing them or
keeping them in a separate category. I prefer keeping them as a
16 matches
Mail list logo
