Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

-0 (binding) (I like the prefix) Am 8. Mai 2024 07:41:16 MESZ schrieb Sheng Wu : >-0 binding > >Sheng Wu 吴晟 >Twitter, wusheng1108 > >Dave Fisher 于2024年5月8日周三 12:16写道： >> >> +0 (binding) wave >> >> > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang >> > wrote: >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > I

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

-0 binding Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Dave Fisher 于2024年5月8日周三 12:16写道： > > +0 (binding) wave > > > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach. > > > > Francis > > > > On 8/05/2024 10:31 am,

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+0 (binding) wave > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach. > > Francis > > On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote: >> Hi, >> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following >>

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 binding The GitHub repo name usually matches the project name. Dropping 'incubator' makes it cleaner. We'll just make sure to highlight the 'Incubating' status on our website, in the GitHub description, the README, and all release versions. I think it's very clear to the developers of the

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 not binding from wilfreds On 2024/05/08 00:31:23 tison wrote: > Hi, > > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following > proposals: > > 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo > to > have a name without the incubator- prefix. > 2.

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1(non-binding) Thanks ZhangJian He Twitter: shoothzj Wechat: shoothzj On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:25 AM Xuanwo wrote: > +1 binding from Xuanwo > > On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 08:31, tison wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following > > proposals: >

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 binding from Xuanwo On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 08:31, tison wrote: > Hi, > > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following > proposals: > > 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo > to > have a name without the incubator- prefix. > 2.

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 binding clr > On May 7, 2024, at 17:31, tison wrote: > > Hi, > > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following > proposals: > > 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo > to > have a name without the incubator- prefix. > 2.

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 (non-binding) Alex On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 8:35 PM Francis Chuang wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach. > > Francis > > On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following >

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 (binding) I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach. Francis On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote: Hi, Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following proposals: 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo to have a

[VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

Hi, Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following proposals: 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo to have a name without the incubator- prefix. 2. Allow existing ongoing podlings to ask the INFRA to drop their incubator- prefix by