Hi,
Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
proposals:
1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo to
have a name without the incubator- prefix.
2. Allow existing ongoing podlings to ask the INFRA to drop their
incubator- prefix by n
+1 (binding)
I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach.
Francis
On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
proposals:
1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo to
have a nam
+1 (non-binding)
Alex
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 8:35 PM Francis Chuang
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach.
>
> Francis
>
> On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> >
+1 binding clr
> On May 7, 2024, at 17:31, tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> proposals:
>
> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo
> to
> have a name without the incubator- prefix.
> 2. Allow
+1 binding from Xuanwo
On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 08:31, tison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> proposals:
>
> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo
> to
> have a name without the incubator- prefix.
> 2.
+1(non-binding)
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:25 AM Xuanwo wrote:
> +1 binding from Xuanwo
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 08:31, tison wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> > proposals:
>
+1 not binding from wilfreds
On 2024/05/08 00:31:23 tison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> proposals:
>
> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo
> to
> have a name without the incubator- prefix.
> 2.
+1 binding
The GitHub repo name usually matches the project name. Dropping 'incubator'
makes it cleaner.
We'll just make sure to highlight the 'Incubating' status on our website,
in the GitHub description, the README, and all release versions. I think
it's very clear to the developers of the proj
+0 (binding) wave
> On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach.
>
> Francis
>
> On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
>> proposa
-0 binding
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
Dave Fisher 于2024年5月8日周三 12:16写道:
>
> +0 (binding) wave
>
> > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach.
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tiso
-0 (binding)
(I like the prefix)
Am 8. Mai 2024 07:41:16 MESZ schrieb Sheng Wu :
>-0 binding
>
>Sheng Wu 吴晟
>Twitter, wusheng1108
>
>Dave Fisher 于2024年5月8日周三 12:16写道:
>>
>> +0 (binding) wave
>>
>> > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > I think
11 matches
Mail list logo