On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 October 2011 09:09, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:58 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 October 2011 02:02, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Christian
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:57 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thats exactly what I mean with a mess. Hope it clarifies a bit, b/c I
thought about it a pretty long time.
I agree that the LHS menu is confusing
- 95+ visible links on a webpage visible navigation is a mess for me.
It's not much longer than the LHS navigation, and would be a similar
length if the non-project entries were removed as previously proposed.
It not about length. Its about confusion level. 40 links on the left,
40 on the
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
There's been talk on the OpenOffice dev list about a public list of
PPMC members. Now that there's an overall podlings.xml registery,
should there perhaps be a standard for something similar at the
podling level, that a
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
There is always:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo
This isn't necessarily the same as the members of the PPMC
I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet.
Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout
changes. You are already working on the next steps :-)
I'm not keen on losing the RH podling list, if that's what you mean; I
think it's useful.
You was the only
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:25 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2011 02:08, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2011 00:47, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Updated to use new format and committed.
Output is to project-menu.tmp file currently; edit build.xml
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies. Forgot the status field.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay...attached is a very simple podlings.xml, made from the contents
of the podlings page.
I itemized
Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we
start the vote tomorrow.
I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add
another committer to the roster. Abu Obeida Bakhach
abu.obe...@microsoft.com has been following the WP7 part of Phonegap
and would
Hi,
based on the recent comments I did some more work on the layout.
http://code.grobmeier.de/incubator-draft-v2/
http://code.grobmeier.de/incubator-draft-v2/projects/index.html
http://code.grobmeier.de/incubator-draft-v2/projects/ognl.html
*
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Christian,
please, see inline comments.
On 7 October 2011 12:11, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes:
- used bootstrap http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ (AL licensed)
+1 looks like
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 October 2011 20:06, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
What about storing the podling names in a table somewhere and using a
Javascript fragment to read the table and populate the right-column
list? Pages that include
Brian,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Hey Jukka I think there are still some questions around the Weinre
source licenses. Some brainstorms going on over naming on the phonegap
mailinglist too. What would be normal here? Wait until the start of
next week
Hello,
I have setup a status page for DirectMemory:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/directmemory.html
@Mentors: please track the progress of the podling there
Proposed next step: file an issue and create required resources like
mailinglists, jira, wiki.
SVN folder has been created by
Hi,
currently we use a three column model. On the right side is the search
box, links to thanks page and all the projects listed. Everytime we
add a new podling all podling pages need to be updated too.
I we should remove the third (right) column, because:
- the thanks page is already linked on
The RH column is relatively narrow, so does not compress the main
column too much.
Cannot agree here
Indeed without it, the main column is too wide on my screen, making it
more difficult to read, as the end of the line is so far from the
beginning of the next.
I plan to work more on the
of growing our community and
enabling widespread adoption.
== Core Developers ==
In alphabetical order:
* Christian Grobmeier grobmeier at apache dot org
* Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchiara at apache dot org
* Olivier Lamy olamy at apache dot org
* Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele dot p dot guidi
Tim,
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Discussion seems to have waned and with an overall positive vibe - are
we ready to call the vote?
Simone has volunteered to open a vote, i think he mentioned tomorrow.
Cheers
Christian
Thanks,
--tim
On Tue,
Hi,
amazing. As a PhoneGap user you made my day this early morning.
Because I already read some phongap mailinglists, you can sign me up
as a mentor, if you like. (grobmeier AT apache ).
Btw, I guess you have missed that you need a wiki (required resources)
Cheers,
Christian
On Sat, Oct 1,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK, the proposal period had died now and I'm now calling a formal VOTE on
the Any23 proposal located here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Any23Proposal
Proposal text copied at the
I just saw the plan is to use Confluence for Websites. I think this
should not be done anymore, the Apache CMS is preferred instead, or
one could use Maven et al. Was the intention to write Wiki instead
of Website?
Cheers
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi
this
will happen to soon.
Anyway, lets wait for a few days until the git discussion have settled
down before we vote.
Cheers
Christian
Cheers,
Raffaele
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
I just saw the plan is to use Confluence for Websites. I
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 9/21/2011 10:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I would like to add this image in addition:
http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf
Because an image does say more than thousand words...
Awesomeness
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 9/21/2011 10:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I would like to add this image in addition:
http://code.grobmeier.de
.
Board sponsorship happens for 'special' circumstances (like OO), and I
don't pretend to understand why it's important.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:28 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation?
Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling.
So whats the name for Podling before it becomes one? Simply project
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
...it seems useful that one person would step forth and
claim to be the champion of bringing a certain project to the ASF and
[implicitly]
champion |ˈCHampēən| noun
1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition,
esp. in sports:
2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else:
The correct usage is of course definition #2
What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks
What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are
speaking to the general list on their own.
The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding
mentors and other interested parties.
The Champion assists the candidate on their initial submission to a Sponsor.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are
speaking to the general list on their own.
The cause is getting the podling accepted
I would like to add this image in addition:
http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf
I like it - I'd just say mentors, plural, in the reddish box on the right.
Agreed, I have changed it local and wait if there are more comments
-Bertrand
I would like to add this image in addition:
http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf
Because an image does say more than thousand words...
Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation?
Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling.
So whats the name for
Si senor Mi piace bere vino e birra
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github
(come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare
comodo, visto che
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:24 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds like a really exciting project to bring to Apache. I'd be
happy to volunteer as a mentor if you need one, with the so many
existing ASF committors and members part of the project i expect
incubation should go
If there is someone in the existing list that want to step-up as
mentor, feel free to do it!
I suggest that Christian and Olivier are excellent candidates :)
oh yes, I will add my name there later too
Cheers
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue,
- the proposal doesn't have a champion, wouldn't that be you?
The main concern is that I'm not a champion :P Anyway if no one else
would like to do it, I would be very nice to do it, but I would
prefere if more experienced people like Christian or Olivier would do
it
Actually you (Simone)
Hi,
I was looking into that:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Sponsor
And thought, if an upcoming podling is deciding to become a TLD it
should ask the board to sponsor it.
Now I have been told from Andrus that this is not the case and usually
the Incubator
And thought, if an upcoming podling is deciding to become a TLD it
should ask the board to sponsor it.
Now I have been told from Andrus that this is not the case and usually
the Incubator is sponsoring TLD projects.
Yes, as I said on the board list I don't remember the board sponsoring
it's important.
This makes it even more confusing to me. It is really overengineered ;-)
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking into that:
http
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO the champion helps clarify the incubator process up to acceptance
of the podling into the incubator. For example the
Hi,
as already mentioned I find this paragraph very confusing:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Sponsor
I propose to change it to the text below. Basically I have left out
the Sponsoring entity Board, because the board does not sponsor an
Podling from the
hey thats a pretty nice name, +1
Cheers
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
When I was doing the initial trademark search for HMS, I found that
there are a lot of projects (including software) named HMS. It also
has the problem of being very bad to search
Hello,
just updated the ognl page and saw that there is a new hms status page
checked in, but the generated html is missing. Is is necessary to
commit the html page too to be visible on the incubator website. I was
not sure if the page is ready yet, so I did not do it - the HMS people
may want to
of the podling or add it
if it is a new one, then run build and then commit both the XML and
HTML files :).
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
just updated the ognl page and saw that there is a new hms status page
checked in, but the generated html
+1
Work quickly guys, I need Kalumet. ;-)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Kalumet to be an Apache Incubator project.
Kalumet is a project for deploying applications and manage resources
in J2EE environments.
Here's a link
Hello,
can I look somehow (I am member too) in some kind of archive with the
software grants or in a list which grants have been received?
I was looking at one of my podlings (Zeta) and saw the copyright
sections was not ticked. I would now like to check if EZ has sent it.
I am not aware I could
Dear all,
this vote has passed with 6 +1, 4 of them binding:
Chris Mattmann
Martijn Dashorst
Christian Grobmeier
Robert Donkin
Craig Russel *
Maurizio Cucchiara *
Thanks to all who voted!
OGNL will perform the next steps:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject
Cheers
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:57 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 August 2011 13:38, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
this vote has passed with 6 +1, 4 of them binding:
Chris Mattmann
Martijn Dashorst
Christian Grobmeier
Robert Donkin
Craig Russel *
I assume
Hello,
all ASF project need to be conform with the branding requirements.
Therefore I think it should be an exit criteria to implement this
requirements. To track that, I would like to add a new item on the
template in section Copyright, like:
Does the projects website reflect the ASF wide
Thanks Antonio for letting us know. I am sorry you have no cycles to
join up, but maybe you will come back at later point in time.
I will remove you from the committer list when the vote is over.
Cheers!
Christian
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com
Dear all,
the Commons Community and the OGNL Community (which is overlapping
heavily) would like to see OGNL graduated.
We don't see any risks in graduating OGNL. Most of the OGNL committers
are already ASF committers, or even at Commons. Code grants etc are
all fine. OGNL has not made a release
Have you used https?
On Thursday, August 25, 2011, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/21/2011 03:38 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Etch and Tashi are signed off.
Droids (seems the easiest one to sign off on) and Olio (likely to be
retired) left from 2008 inductees.
2009 list
Another option which might be cleaner and less burdensome to administer would
be to create a boilerplate Retired Podling static html page which would
replace the website for any podling which does not graduate. This page would
give a brief explanation of the project's history and status and
userid - mine is w...@apache.org == a
project name Apache Wave?
Not that I have noticed any spam coming to me.
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 19, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi Dan,
thanks. I have updated the status page for wave to reflect this.
Cheers
Christian
On Fri, Aug 19
anybody with write access update the auth file and add leadpipe
to the OGNL podling please?
Thanks!
Christian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:53 PM
Subject: Authorization file not on LDAP?
To: general
Thanks Stefan!
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-08-15, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Can anybody with write access update the auth file and add leadpipe
to the OGNL podling please?
Done
Stefan
It looks like someone needs to correct the guide you were following
...
Ah that explains so much. Thanks
Most projects have a mentor who can do it, but not all mentors can. Any
chance you could edit whichever doc you followed?
Yes, just updated with the phrase you send
Can anybody with
Hello,
there is a lock on /www/logging.apache.org I can't remove:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 carnold logging 0 Jun 7 2010 lock
My intention is to update the site to reflect the new branding
requirements, as already pre warned.
Curt, could you remove your lock (or run svn udpate ;-))
Cheers!
+1 for TLD
My reason: No suitable TLP exists which is build system and
language agnostic.
And I think RAT is an attractive, little project. With time, it will
become very useful to others.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Rat is
3) Existing podlings are grandfathered in until the end of the year,
at which point they will have to start reporting monthly if they have
not completed the item.
Sorry I don't understand this point :). Would you please explain ?
I think its meant like:
All incubator projects, which were
1) The podling are to list the individuals/entities who need to grant
rights for any existing software moving to the ASF. These may be
either ICLAs or Software Grants. [Ideally this would be listed, or at
least described, in the proposals].
Good idea, we should update the proposal template
* Keep website or remove?
As the source code will be deleted, I do not see a reason to keep the
website. For reasons to keep history we have always have the status
page. I am for removing it
Christian
Hen
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Yes, I don't have community, so I hoped to find it here.
BTW missing community does not mean that libraries are useless.
Apache is not a library collection foundation, its all around community here
Imagero is still commercial library and is used by few big companies like
Agenzia Ansa. I
+1
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
Apache
Hello,
after there were no additions to the retirement guide, I added it to
the main navigation. May it be of help
Cheers,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi,
Luke Blanshard (leadpipe) is only in the incubator group, but he
should be also in the ongl group.
According to:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
After root creates the new account, a Mentor updates the
authorization file to add the new committer to both the committer-?
section
Noel,
apologies, I have added it now for OGNL.
To be honest, it was a mentor failure - the project has written its
report and ask mentors to sign it and add it to the wiki. And we
mentors all forgot.
Cheers
Christian
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
vote exists, of which I was not aware: Yoav Shapira
+1 (non binding)
The correct list of votes is:
* Christian Grobmeier +1
* Scott Deboy +1
* Ivan Habunek +1
* Vladimir Gorej +1 (non binding)
* Yoav Shapira +1 (non binding)
Sorry for the mixup.
Best regards,
Ivan
On 12 July
If bluesky project was rejected by ASF?
would we continue to use SVN to upload our codes?
Not the ASF SVN server.
But you can use for example google code to host bluesky and upload to
there svn servers:
http://code.google.com/hosting/
2011/7/6 Bernd Fondermann
ore more official
Apache project.
To which project could Bluesky demonstrate affinity?
Christian
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Can they upload it to Apache-Extras if it still exists ?
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
on file (documents/grants/imsec-alois.pdf) from IMSEC GmbH
for ALOIS (code and all documentation) dated 4-Oct-2010.
This plus some elbow grease should allow a mentor to definitively establish
provenance of the code...
Craig
On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Do you have any
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently I'd describe it as:
http://attic.apache.org/process.html
So, is a failed incubation project going into the attic? I don't think
so. In addition i don't think board needs to approve that, this is
incubator
Here are to sections, retired and dormant:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
What is the actual difference between these two?
I think we should only have one term and one section, be it retired or dormant.
Cheers
Christian
, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Do you have any tipps how I can make sure the source is covered by the
CLAs? As I understood we just have the initial import in SVN. All
committers have CLAs on file. Is that enough?
It depends on who the copyright owners/licensees of the original
import were
The work you did to research and verify this, is the grease I was talking
about.
Therefore I consider this code is fine to stay in SVN.
I really don't know what other kinds of elbow grease I can apply
That's it for me. I have no problems with this code staying around in case
anyone in
Friendly reminder - we still need one more +1 from a PMC for this release.
If somebody has the time to check it out, please feel free :-)
Thanks in advance!
Christian
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ivan Habunek ivan.habu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
It is my pleasure to announce the
Do you have any tipps how I can make sure the source is covered by the
CLAs? As I understood we just have the initial import in SVN. All
committers have CLAs on file. Is that enough?
It depends on who the copyright owners/licensees of the original
import were. Identify that set, then remove
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
a swift vote can close the project down.
+1
Christian
Upayavira
On Fri, 01
sure the source is covered by the
CLAs? As I understood we just have the initial import in SVN. All
committers have CLAs on file. Is that enough?
Cheers,
Christian
?
Hen
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to close this vote with +1
I believe projects from school could also rock in Apache as well. You can
look down up on us but you can't deny others.
This is not the point.
The point is, if you have contributors who have no apache id, they
a) need to sign an ICLA
b) need to create an Jira issue and attach an svn diff
I would like to close this vote with +1 from:
Betrand Delacretaz
Alan Cabrera
Henri Yandell
Mohamma Nour El-Din
Noel Bergman
Christian Grobmeier
I will try to do the necessary retirement steps as soon as I can.
Thanks for your time!
Christian
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Christian
Hence the need for people to download KEYS files from an *.apache.org
domain that we do control. Putting KEYS in a distribution might cause
people to use them instead of getting them from a trusted source, and
that's bad.
The keys should be included in the web of trust, so it shouldn't
we copy a KEYS file into that directory upon succesful VOTE of the release
artifacts (which also include the KEYS file).
Perhaps, but the point we're getting at was explicitly stated by Benson,
The goal here is to allow and encourage consumers to independently verify
signatures. That calls
I would like to know how many signing keys are actually trusted which
have been used for our releases.
Quite a few, see http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/apache.html
Interesting - thanks for the link.
So, 53% of our software is signed with untrusted keys. I have expected
70% untrusted
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:20:13 +0200:
we copy a KEYS file into that directory upon succesful VOTE of the release
artifacts (which also include the KEYS file).
Perhaps, but the point
+1
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
developers are
PMCs -
we are currently voting on the next log4php release (see below).
Please take yourself a few minutes and participate in the vote.
I am - unfortunately - the only PMC involved in log4php, so we need your voices
Cheers
Christian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ivan Habunek
It seems to me to be a bad idea to distribute keys with releases.
+1
And don't
we already have some ASF-wide policy for managing keys?
I don't know if there is a policy, but I recently found this:
http://people.apache.org/foaf/index.html
PGP keys may additionally be added to your profile on
you need to write to general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org to subscribe
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Joe Key joeandrew...@gmail.com wrote:
--
Joe Andrew Key (Andy)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hello,
as already mentioned last week, the ALOIS project is dead and it seems
there is no way to recover in near future (or even later). The
developers told me in a private message in March that they cannot
continue due to personal reasons. It seem this has become truth.
I have set up a vote on
Hi all,
shortly after the last report in March one of the Alois-Devs contacted
me and told me, that there will be no further development on the
project because of some personal trouble and changes to the company
IMSEC (inventor of alois). Even prior march there were only slow steps
to observe -
Cooper
+1 dims Davanum Srinivas
+1 dirkx Dirk-Willem van Gulik
+1 elecharny Emmanuel Lecharny
-0 gnodet Guillaume Nodet
+1 grobmeier Christian Grobmeier
+1 gstein Greg Stein
+1 jim Jim Jagielski
+1 joes Joe Schaefer
+1 jukka Jukka
I just added the incubator status page.
Due to the high number of committers, would it be ok to add the
committer names once the (iclas accounts) are fine?
Would like to avoid names in the list, who have thought to step up,
but then declined for some reason later.
I am referring to the project
Wave is already in the making - seems it has just been forgotten to
add to the wiki. I pinged them
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly
happen), but we're late. BeanValidation,
Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
You think Apache Harmony is a comparable
Ketih,
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
no to OOo at the ASF.
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
no to OOo at the ASF. We
There are still people signing up as initial committers.
Is it a sign to wait a bit longer with the vote?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
First some current stats:
73 committers.
18 currently have iclas on file.
29 have openoffice.org email
Is it a sign to wait a bit longer with the vote?
Deadlines are good at inciting action. :-)
There's no problem with them joining later, is it?
Nope.
Its just a bit more complicated as they need to get voted in.
I intend to proceed as planned.
Fine for me.
- Sam Ruby
Yes, me too.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I forgot to add (binding) to my +1, but I don't think I'm alone.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/10/2011 12:04 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
401 - 500 of 615 matches
Mail list logo
