Re: [VOTE] The retirement of Apache Milagro

+1 [binding] thanks for keeping an eye on projects without progress, Frederic Danese On Mon 18 Mar 2024 at 07:46, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi All, > > Based on discussion[1], I would like to call a vote to retire Apache > Milagro. > > Please vote accordingly: > [] +1 approve > [] +0 no

Re: [VOTE] Retire Wave

+1 to retire (binding) Danese On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling. > > The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC > to confirm this retirement. > > [

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Danese > On Nov 10, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > [ x] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

Please VOTE as follows [x] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator (binding vote) Danese On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the

Re: Warning from d...@juneau.incubator.apache.org

I get these in spates. As James says they don't seem to cause real trouble so I have learned to ignore them. They only happen between Apache mail server and Gmail. D > On Jul 9, 2016, at 2:45 PM, James Carman wrote: > > I have the same issue on a couple of

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

Binding vote D > On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > > [ X ] +1 Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

+1 (binding) Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator podling. D > On Jan 30, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Joshua > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the

Re: Post mortem request for the handling of the Corinthia podling (was Re: FYI, I have subscribed to this list and to your private list)

One nit with this discussion. It's not true that GPL says it's not okay to make money. If it were then RedHat couldn't exist. It is true that the ASF and the FSF have historically been religiously incompatible on the subject of licensing combinatorics. As I usually explain to my clients, the

Re: [VOTE] Retire Ripple

+1 (binding) > On Nov 30, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Greetings, > > The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list. > > http://s.apache.org/LjX > > It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the >

Re: [VOTE] Retire Corinthia

+1 (binding) D > On Nov 16, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Greetings, > > The Corinthia community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/odN > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

What Niall said. +1 and congrats. Danese On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for laying out all the evidence for graduation - this was a good vote email. +1 from me. Niall On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chip Childers

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Allura to enter the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Jun 21, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: Hi, We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours has passed since the initial proposal. The proposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation

Please cast your votes: [x ] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation [ ] -1 Reject ODF Toolkit for incubation (binding)

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

I'll be glad to moderate too. Danese On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.comwrote: If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead and create the mailing lists. - Original Message From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net To:

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

Please cast your votes: [ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation Danese

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

Sorry, should have said +1 [binding] On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote: Please cast your votes: [ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation Danese

Re: OOo Monetary Donations

Hi Martin...welcome. Nice to see you post here. Danese On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Martin Hollmichel martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, time to introduce myself, I'm Martin Hollmichel, contributor to StarOffice/OpenOffice.org since 1994, member of the OpenOffice.org

Re: OpenOffice Proposal: Nominated Mentors

Help me understand why the project would most benefit from that situation, Don. Mentors' main role is to help podling members learn the Apache Way so they can graduate to TLP. This project enjoys a wealth of excellent mentors and we happen to mostly be people who have worked successfully

A little OOo history

Some of you know I was closely involved in the original open-sourcing of StarDivision code as OpenOffice.org. I'm also an Apache Member. Thought some of the current discussions could benefit from a tiny bit of (no axe to grind) history. This information is offered in the spirit of trying to

Re: A little OOo history

, but I would assume effectively zero consumer end-users would get their software from us... D On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Phillip Rhodes motley.crue@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote: 4) most customers use OOo on Windows Last time

Re: A little OOo history

Just have to say...I have often been quoted saying the advent of OpenOffice.org was a rare case of corporate greed aligning with human need. Safe to assume a high percentage of downloaders don't have $.99. I know we're all excited by the commercial potential of an unencumbered codebase, but

Re: A little OOo history

robert_w...@us.ibm.com: Not surprisingly, you missed my point (or chose to ignore it). We at Apache don't think that money is evil, but we also believe that seeing our code in wide use is more important than money. OpenOffice.org is important to the Developing World, some of whom will pay for

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal

And I just heard back from OSCON. We have a room available all day Monday (the first tutorial day). As mentioned before, access to this meeting would be gratis. D On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: I just heard back from the Open World Forum Programme Committee

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal

Jomar, I had to verify my email address, then log back in to activate the edit token. Gotta love them wikis ;-p. D On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Jomar Silva (Cuca) homem...@gmail.com wrote: Yep... but even logged in I couldn't edit it... I'm from the third world, you know :) Jomar

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal

Actually some of us at ConCom are already deep into discussion about what meetings would best support better understanding between parties. As an Apache member, I'm normally quite willing to see email thrash eventually work itself out...but this news has caused so much concern (and circular

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal

However, it seems to me that October and November are still rather far off, and with the wealth of conferences over the next two months, perhaps we could set something up sooner than that? OSCON, anyone? I've just asked for a room at OSCON, although I'd like to mention that many of TDF's members

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal

Well...we were thinking about adding a track at http://www.transfersummit.com/BarCamp which is in Europe...at least. D On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote: However, it seems to me

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal

Eric (and all), We're only just starting to discuss this...Once we decide on a few venues for meetings...we'll start wiki pages for signups so people can say whether they'll be there. Danese On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote: Hi, Le 6 juin 11 à 20:21, Greg

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal - Budget Concerns

: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote: However, it seems to me that October and November are still rather far off, and with the wealth of conferences over the next

Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal - Budget Concerns

As for Ohio, I am already planning on attending, I happen to be keynoting at OLF this year...purely coincidence. Happy to host a BOF about the Apache Way there if it would help. Danese

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

Mine too. Sorry to be tardy, but since I offered to mentor maybe my binding +1 was implicit already. Sent from my phone On Nov 16, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And of course, my +1. Paul On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Roller graduation

Add one sentimental, non-binding +1 from Danese On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Dave wrote: Votes so far: +1 Otis +1 Niclas Binding: +1 Yoav +1 Henri +1 Davanum +1 Brian +1 Martin +1 Jim +1 Alex +1 Noel +1 Jean At what point do we declare victory and start working on the post-graduation check

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heraldry Identity Project

Roy and others at Apache, There are a few OASIS TCs that meet the requirements of Apache and other FOSS projects with respect to implementability without fear of royalty burden or patent reprisal. The ability to do stipulate such provisions was hard-fought at OASIS (first by Sun and later

Re: Harmony Podlling Quarterly Report

Been watching this debate and thought I should chime in that Sun has more than one community where the *source* is under one license (say LGPL for instance) but the *mail lists* are explicitly under more liberal terms of use. Why are you all assuming that they mail list must be under a

Re: PROPOSAL : Apache Harmony - J2SE 5 Project

Leo Simons Davanum Srinivas The following Apache Members will be the sponsoring members : Noel Bergman Jason Hunter Ben Laurie Ted Leung Geir Magnusson Jr. Stefano Mazzocchi Sam Ruby Leo Simons Davanum Srinivas The following community members support this effort : Danese