Re: [DISCUSS] Community diversity (again)

Thilo Goetz wrote: It's just that to an outsider, it is totally unclear what that means. And it may be impossible to really convey the meaning of it in a few sentences. So why don't we just say so. Make it absolutely clear that the diversity of the community will be judged by the IPMC based o

Re: Lucene.Net Comitters

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Another option might be to take the code somewhere else for a while, work on it, gather a community and come back to the incubator when the project has gathered some momentum. Why would that be a good idea? The infrastructure is already set up and working at Apache,

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

Upayavira wrote: Justin put it very well in a related thread elsewhere (permission sought): [ CHOP interesting adamant view from Justin ] (Where is "elsewhere", btw?) What I find strange in all this is the view that ALL projects at Apache would have to change to OtherSCM if one project would

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Feb 18, 2008 10:48 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: outright FUD? Sorry but I don't think there is Fear, Uncertainty or Doubt in this thread. There are several testimonies of good experiences I feel there has been lots of FUD and if you don't realize tha

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

Paul Querna wrote: Santiago Gala wrote: El dom, 17-02-2008 a las 19:02 -0500, Noel J. Bergman escribió: No. This is the wrong forum. What we've said here is that there won't be any deviation from the ASF infrastructure for source control; changing ASF infrastructure is out of scope for the I

Re: [***SPAM***] - [List1] U.M.A. II English International Open Judo Back to Back Ne

Upayavira wrote: On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:48 -0500, Ben Ramsey wrote: On 2/14/08 6:07 AM, Dynamis Gym wrote: I have completed the UNSUBSCRIBE REQUEST twice now, and you are still sending me these e-mails. Please REMOVE ME FROM YOUR LIST immediately, or I will report you for harvesting my e-m

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet - Pluto

Bill Stoddard wrote: Endre Stølsvik wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Sure, activity is not that high, and there's not a *huge* developer community, but there does not really seem to be any problem, either. Apache doesn't require projects to be huge successes (by whatever metric) as long

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link

kelvin goodson wrote: I think what we were trying to say is that this work belongs in a project of it own ... The new project requires an environment where it can focus on the clear aim of implementing this JSR RI and TCK, or future versions, Is this really what Apache is for? without the di

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet - Pluto

Leo Simons wrote: Sure, activity is not that high, and there's not a *huge* developer community, but there does not really seem to be any problem, either. Apache doesn't require projects to be huge successes (by whatever metric) as long as they're healthy and self-sustaining. This was not h

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet - Pluto

Stefan Hepper wrote: It is not true that after the JSR was final everything stopped. In fact once we had finished 1.0 there was still work done to get to a more stable 1.0.1 release. After that the pluto community re-structed the code which led to the pluto 1.1 stream, so you can see that it w

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet

kelvin goodson wrote: Hi all, We've posted an Apache Incubator proposal onto the incubator wiki http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal We haven't got a good name yet, SandStorm is a contender, as is Snowdon Suggestions and comments welcome, Kelvin.

Re: [DISCUSSION] BlueSky Proposal

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Friday 04 January 2008 11:22, Bozhong Lin wrote: If Apache could help this first Chinese-initiated project into incubation, this will stimulate lot of enthusiasms in talented Chinese developer community and many great Chinese-initiated projects could come to Apache comm

Re: [DISCUSSION] BlueSky Proposal

Bill Stoddard wrote: Incubator PMC, http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky This sounds like a really interesting project. I mean that in two ways: first, the project looks very worthwhile in itself, helping rural communities a couple of extra steps up the education ladder by way of hig

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

James Strachan wrote: On 11/21/06, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you do when it comes time to vote? Clearly, you can't be voting on the RC build, as that's not the final build (the final build doesn't include RC in the name, does it?), and it's my understanding that only fin

Re: Release Requirements

If you tried to use the release and it is broken, you have a ground for -1 vote, but if you expected a Makefile in the src folder, and it wasn't there (e.g. because the build procedure is a little more involved than that), you probably don't. For what it's probably not worth, I'd like to point

Re: Release Requirements

Eelco Hillenius wrote: On 10/12/06, Endre Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Endre Stølsvik wrote: > >> My two (probably rather worthless) cents: > > Not at all worthless. What you posted is perfectly valid feedback, and > should be consid

Re: Release Requirements

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Endre Stølsvik wrote: My two (probably rather worthless) cents: Not at all worthless. What you posted is perfectly valid feedback, and should be considered by projects. But does it rise to the standard of needing to be enforced? In my opinion, yes. This is because

Re: Release Requirements

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can we agree that regardless of which style one might prefer the packaging, there are multiple valid approaches, and that this level of difference should not be a release criteria for the Incubator? Yes, agreed,

Re: Apache Agila : BPM engine

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: | All, | | The Jakarta PMC has voted to accept in Jakarta the contribution of a | BPM engine from Gluecode, my employer, and I am starting the basic work | of getting it into [and out of] incubation. BPM.. Rite. DJ-lingo: "Beats Per Minute" Some jou

Re: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta

| Actually, this is present Apache policy. You can't link to them at | all. Sorry. Why on earth can't Apache link to LGPL libraries? What's with you guys? Have you heard about something called "the open source community"? It's about reusing code n'allthat... Endre. ---