+1 (binding), with the caveat that I personally think it might be easier
to split WS-Messenger off to the Axis PMC sooner rather than later if
everyone feels like it will end up there anyway.
As a side note - the W3C is looking for implementations of the WS-RA
specs, which include Eventing...
Hi Ross, all,
I think in general this looks great and I'd definitely +1 bringing
Airavata to the Incubator.
The only point I'd explore a bit is the WS-Messenger component, in
particular whether this bit might (either now or eventually) want to end
up in the Axis project, since it seems like
On 11/22/2010 9:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Bad habits are hard to break, esp when done early... Comparing the
> behaviors of "TLP's in good standing" to new podlings seems
> disingenuous. I'm sure some seasoned automobile drivers drive
> with 1 hand on the wheel. Is that something you encourage
+1 as usual to Benson's extremely reasonable and pleasantly snarky viewpoint.
While I do see the dangers of fragmenting the community, I think people often
go too far in downplaying the benefits of real-time communication. Quick
back-and-forths can enable complex scenarios to be thought through i
+1 from me.
I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK
with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is paying
attention... but it would be nice if we didn't need two.
--Glen
On 11/12/2010 3:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'd like to propose that
So, just to be clear here as to current policy...
The only binding votes that matter with respect to new committers are in fact
Incubator PMC members - therefore for now, all three of Matthieu, Paul, and
myself would need to +1 a new committer in order for them to be accepted.
In other words, wh
On 9/26/2010 1:08 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> I'll take a crack at updating the project page with the current status, and
>> making sure the committers/initial PPMC members are in fact subscribed to
>> the
>> private list. Question - process-wise, is it OK for me to simply bulk
>> subscribe the
Hello HISE committers!
Due to an oversight at the beginning of the HISE incubation, none of you were
apparently invited to the HISE private email list. :( You are all on the
PPMC, as you were the initial accepted list of people in the proposal. As
one of your mentors, I apologize that this wasn'
lves?
Thanks,
--Glen
On 9/25/2010 10:26 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Give Matthew Riou and Glen Daniels time to reply before
> "fixing" this please.
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Benson Margulies
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
On 9/17/2010 11:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>> +1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very active community
>> in the IRC room, where we brainstorm and help each other out all the time
>
> I don't think anybody said
On 9/17/2010 9:41 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's a
> tool for security incident and event management. Since the chat channell
> in the required resources list was only a wish, I gladly dropped it off
> the proposal.
Hi Urs,
While I cert
On 9/8/2010 8:44 AM, ant elder wrote:
> -0
>
> I agree with the comments from David and others such as [1] and the
> suggestion at [2] to call it something more abstract like Apache
> Connecto.
>
> Thats IMHO anyway, I'm not sure that the IPMC should be the ones with
> binding votes on this but i
On 8/27/2010 12:15 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> For me as a know-nothing outsider the suggestion of Content Connector
> Framework pointed me a bit towards what it does.
+1 from the peanut gallery. :) I had the same thought - part of my (also
know-nothing outsider) knee-jerk issue with the ACF name i
Gotta agree with David here. I'd prefer a less ambiguous name.
--Glen
"David Jencks" wrote:
>As I attempted to politely make clear earlier I find this name extremely
>confusing. Web connectors are just one subject area I assume this project
>covers.
>
>I think its generally a good idea if
Seems to work fine, although you should perhaps make super-clear in the next
version's README that you require JDK 1.6 (I was on 1.5 and had build problems).
+1 from me for the release.
Thanks,
--Glen
On 2/15/2010 10:05 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> The ESME community has voted on and approved the
Hi Noel,
I did not receive such a mail.
--Glen
On 2/15/2010 11:16 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I have sent an e-mail directly to everyone who is officially on the
> Incubator PMC. If you did NOT receive that e-mail, and believe that you
> should be on the PMC, please notify me, via e-mail here.
+1
--Glen
Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Shindig
> as a TLP [1].
>
> I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of
> Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board.
> To that end I have prepared the resol
Hi Noel,
Could you please add me to the IPMC?
Thanks,
--Glen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi Matthieu:
Sure, sign me up.
--Glen
Matthieu Riou wrote:
> So anyone else willing to mentor HISE? I can act as mentor too but a third
> would be nice.
> Matthieu
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>
>>> Rafal
This sounds great, folks. +1, looking forward to reviewing the proposal.
I would offer to mentor this project, but I'm a little hesitant about having
the cycles to do a good job of it. If you find that you really need another,
though, sign me up.
Thanks,
--Glen
Matthieu Riou wrote:
> On Wed, O
Paul Fremantle wrote:
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
contributors still considering getting involved, but the normal Apache
Jumping in with a quick $0.02:
> There's also Atomate, a play on automate.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
I really like that, as it's both a play on automate and also
"atom-mate", i.e. a useful companion to Atom.
+1!
--Glen
-
To uns
> Actually, there were at least two that I know of:
>
> IONA: http://www.iona.com/pressroom/2005/20050822b.htm
> Sonic:
> http://www.sonicsoftware.com/news_events/pressitem/pressreleas
> e_648412/index.ssp?
>
> I was the PRC member who gave feedback to IONA, which they
> incorporated. Any comp
23 matches
Mail list logo
