Gotta agree with David here. I'd prefer a less ambiguous name. --Glen
"David Jencks" <[email protected]> wrote: >As I attempted to politely make clear earlier I find this name extremely >confusing. Web connectors are just one subject area I assume this project >covers. > >I think its generally a good idea if projects don't use their names to imply >they are the only apache implementation of a certain kind of functionality. >In this case it seems to me that the name is implying that it is the official >sole apache implementation of at least two distinct kinds of functionality >other than what it actually does. (web container connectors of which mod_jk is >an example and java connector architecture). To be blunt I think this is a >really bad name and feels to me a bit like a land grab. > >thanks >david jencks > >On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:38 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote: >>> >>>> Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk / >>>> Tomcat Connector? >>> >>> Looks pretty distinct to me. >> I agree, the risk that people confuse those two seems very low. >> Especially since the mod_jk has been around for a while and is usually >> referred to as mod_jk and not as Tomcat Connector AFAIK but I can be >> wrong about the latter. >> >> simon >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> p >>>> >>>> On 18 Aug 2010, at 16:17, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or can we just do it? >>>>> Thankfully, I think most of our mailing lists, etc. are already >>>>> "generic", so we shouldn't really need to change much in terms of >>>>> branding other than the primary website. >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 16, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> The "Lucene Connectors Framework" committers are voting to rename our >>>>>> project >>>>>>>> from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework", >>>>>>>> and >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> cease being a subproject of Lucene. What is the process for doing >>>>>> something >>>>>>>> like this? >>>>>> >>>>>>> LCF is not a subproject of Lucene at the moment, since it is in the >>>>>> Incubator. >>>>>>> Nothing else project wise would change other than the name at this >>>>>>> point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unless there is an objection, I don't see a problem. Nothing in Apache >>>>>> Connectors Framework smacks of a possible trademark issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- Noel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
