[jira] [Comment Edited] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17141307#comment-17141307 ] Justin Mclean edited comment on INCUBATOR-253 at 6/21/20, 8:11 AM

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Mclean updated INCUBATOR-253: Description: The main issues are: 1. Source and convenance binary releases containing

[jira] [Comment Edited] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17141307#comment-17141307 ] Justin Mclean edited comment on INCUBATOR-253 at 6/21/20, 6:07 AM

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17141307#comment-17141307 ] Justin Mclean commented on INCUBATOR-253: - Re 1 there was discussion about Category X headers

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17141270#comment-17141270 ] Justin Mclean commented on INCUBATOR-253: - There are more issues mentioned above than in your

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Mclean updated INCUBATOR-253: Description: The main issues are: 1. Source and convenance binary releases containing

[MENTORS] July 2020 Incubator report timeline

Hi, The report timeline for July is: Wed July 01 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun July 05 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun July 05 -- Summary due by end of day Tue July 07 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed July 08 -- Report submitted to Board Wed

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Mclean updated INCUBATOR-253: Description: The main issues are: 1. Source and convenance binary releases containing

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Mclean updated INCUBATOR-253: Description: The main issues are: 1. Source and convenance binary releases containing

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

Justin Mclean created INCUBATOR-253: --- Summary: Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution Key: INCUBATOR-253 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253 Project: Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

Hi, > The build should work on macOS with the requirements listed in the README. > Node.js and Yarn are the two required tools. I had both of them installed but is seem to be expected something else, I can try again if you want the exact error. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] When to add Apache Headers to Third Party Code [WAS] Re: [MENTORS] PPMC case-by-case decision for major modifications of third-party work guidance

HI, > In addition, Justin stated that converting the code from one program language > to another one should **NOT** be considered as a major modification. INAL but my understanding is that translation from one language to another is considered a fairly trivial task and may not be novel enough

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache APISIX (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, +1 (binding) and all the best. I'll also note that has been one of the easiest podling I've mentored as they have from the start proactively seek out how to comply with ASF policy and how to develop their community under the Apache Way. They have set a low committer bar and continue to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pegasus into the Apache incubation

HI, +1 (binding) and good luck I do notice an issue that will need to be fixed is that rapidjson may contain code under the JSON license which is not compatible with the ASF license. The license of XiaoMi/galaxy-fds-sdk-cpp will also need to be sorted. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.3.0

Hi, > Could you show us how to check NOTICE files? It seems manually checking > content often misses information and causes more release cycles. I suggest you ask your mentors for help as they will be familiar with how to do this. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.3.0

Hi, > I read over the [2] and [3],And I have a question on [1] to verify. > Because the license of mybtis-3 is appache-2.0-license,So it needed to add in > the top-level NOTICE file. ALv2 license code only need to be added t NOTICE if it has a NOTICE file. > If it is BSD or MIT license,it

Re: [DISCUSS] When to add Apache Headers to Third Party Code [WAS] Re: [MENTORS] PPMC case-by-case decision for major modifications of third-party work guidance

HI, > * If there’s no any different opinion or objection, keep either origin > Numpy license or ASF license but not dual, which depends on how MXNet’s > source file evolves when the origin Numpy files changes? IMO only if there are significant changes to the file, if in doubt I’d keep the

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE]Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.3.0

Hi, If you want me to check it before you bring it to teh IPMC vote I can do that. Alternately you might want to use the WIP DISCLAIMER. [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#work_in_progress_disclaimer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.1

Hi, -1 (binding) due to licensing concerns. You might want to consider using the WIP disclaimer I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hash correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is missing a number of 3rd party licenses - NOTICE mentions MIT licensed software there’s no need to do

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.3.0

Hi, -1 (binding) as LICENSE and NOTICE are missing information and this file [3] incorrectly has an ASF header (it’s MIT license). Similar issues were brought up last release. I checked: - incubating in nam - LICENSE is missing license for [3] - NOTICE in missing information from [1] See [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp 2.0.0-incubating-rc4

Hi +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - Don't have a suitable environment setup to compile Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes are fine - LICENSE is perhaps missing something e.g. license for [1] - NOTICE is fine - DISCLAIMER exists but please list why you are using the WIP disclaimer - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.4.0 RC2

Hi, +1(binding) if the minor license issues are fixed I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is missing license for these two files [1][2] and mention of sizzle.js. Was the website meant to be included in the source release? - NOTICE is OK (NOTICE-binary has incorrect

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp 2.0.0-incubating-rc4

Hi, > A little over 67 hours into what's supposed to be a 72 hour window, we > still have only one vote. The 72 hours in not a deadline, vote last as long as need to. I suggest you encourage your mentors to vote but I’ll take a look at the release later today, Thanks, Justin

Re: [Proposal] Pegasus - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, > Thank you for your interest, Kevin. Since now we have 2 mentors, shall we > call for a vote? Given Kevin said he only 1/2 mentor it would be preferable if you had one more mentor. Anyone willing to help out? Thanks, Justin

[MENTORS] June 2020 podling report sign offs

Hi, Good to see high rates of mentor sign off: AGE - 75% brpc - 67% Crail - 100% Daffodil - 100% DolphinScheduler - 100% IoTDB - 75% Marvin-AI - 100% Nemo - 75% NLPCraft - 80% Pinot - 50% S2Graph - 50% SAMOA - 100% StreamPipes - 60% Superset - 100% SDAP is currently the only report missing sign

Re: [Proposal] Pegasus - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, The ASF allows 3rd party code to be included in releases. It wouldn’t be part of the grant and still remain the original headers and copyright. The ASF also doesn’t fork other communities code, but given this is unmaintained and no longer in active development [1] from what I can see I

Re: [MENTORS] Podling reports due today

Hi, The reporting deadline has come and gone and these podlings will be asked to report next month: - Hivemall - Spot - Warble Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: Issue with releases / feedback from ASF board

Hi, > On May 5th 2020 I have opened LEGAL-515 and asked (among other > questions) how the MXNet PPMC can correctly reference third-party > distributions on the website. Unfortunately that question was not answered. It looks answered to me. Your question “Finally, I believe the MXNet project

Re: Issue with releases / feedback from ASF board

Hi, > The status quo has been in place since a while. Do you think we have > time to first discuss the correct solution on the Incubator list, before > we delete the existing pages? I’ll ask again. Please remove any releases that are not Apache releases, that includes any releases that are not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.3.0-incubating RC0

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name. - Signatures and hashes are fine but please drop the md5 hash it’s not needed - DISCLAIMER exists (WIP type) - LICENSE needs more work (see blow) - NOTICE may need more work (if other ALv2 code is included) - No unexpected binary files - all

Re: [MENTORS] Podling reports due today

Hi, > So, I kindly ask to report next month. No problem at all, thank for the notification. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

Hi, I’m not seeing any bootstrapping going on for this new podling. Don't forget your first report is also due today. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

[MENTORS] Podling reports due today

Hi, Thanks for all the podlings who have reported, we are still expecting reports from: Age (was AgensGraph) Hivemall Liminal NLPCraft SDAP Spot Warble Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (Incubating) 0.5.0

HI, > None of these libraries are required for the project. I think they are > detected as a transitive dependency through NLPCraft core project itself > and Stanford CoreNLP library (which itself is an optional add-on the core > project). Given they get downloaded/installed by default when

Re: Issue with releases / feedback from ASF board

Hi, I'm writing my board report in the next couple of days and just wondering what progress has been made on this. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (Incubating) 0.5.0

Hi, -1 (binding) Everything else looks fine but you may have GPL dependancies [1][2] Can you confirm if this is or is not the case, and are these optional? [3] I checked: - incubating in names - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - No unexpected

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BlueMarlin in the incubator

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Proposal]New storage project: HBlock

Hi, Just checking in on progress here and where this proposal is at. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BlueMarlin proposal

Hi, > I think we had a good discussion about this proposal. I propose to move > forward with the formal vote. I don’t think there are any objections from the IPMC so you should just do that :-) Thanks, Justin - To

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

Hi, With the name issue resolvedit would be good to see your mentor’s bootstrap the project. You are expected to submit a report this month. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

Hi, I yet to see the mentors bootstrap this podling as you’re expected to report this month you might want to get started. :-) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: Issue with releases / feedback from ASF board

Hi, > Here are some examples using search: > - Arrow https://arrow.apache.org/docs/python/cuda.html "This functionality is optional and must have been enabled at build time. “ So you as a user needs to recompile the code, checking their downloads page this also seems to be the case and there’s

Re: Issue with releases / feedback from ASF board

Hi, > - MXNet publishes only nightly pre-release builds to dist.mxnet.io for the > verification purpose for projects in the ecosystem and for developers who > work on the bleeding edge. IMO Something more needs to be done here, at the very least I would expect to se a very large disclaimer that

[MENTORS] June 2020 Incubator report timeline reports due June 3rd

Hi, Here’s the timeline for the June report [1]: Wed June 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun June 07 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun June 07 -- Summary due by end of day Tue June 09 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed June 10 -- Report submitted to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.8.0 (release candidate 1)

Hi, I ran it again and it worked no issues, sorry no idea what the issue was first time. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX (Incubating) 1.3-RC2

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE and LICENSE and file - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - Platform not supported (OSX) Thanks, Justin - To

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp 2.0.0-incubating-rc2

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binary files - This file [1] is missing an ASF header an/or is of unknown license. I’m guessing it just missing a header? - Can compile from source It might be a good

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.1.0 release

HI, -1 (binding) as I cannot compile the source package from source I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE - No unexpected binary files - All ASF files have ASF headers The build fails for me as it expect it to be in a git repo.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.8.0 (release candidate 1)

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - No unexpected binary files - All ASF file have ASF headers I was unable to get it to “compile” but that is likely my setup it was complaining: Error: Cannot

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

Hi, > Mark is talking about what they did for the Tomcat NOTICE, with no mention > of Commons: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/master/NOTICE I would assume because it's a dependancy and not bundled in the source release. Even if that is the case older projects may not be in line with ASF

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

Hi, > 1. Should the entire file header be moved into NOTICE when a third-party > file is contributed, or should we edit it When a 3rd party file is contributed, it’s header stays were it is on the file, it’s not moved to NOTICE. It the file was part of a software grant then the copyright

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

Hi, > At the time, we considered the whole header to be the relevant "Copyright > notification". Do you think this practice is incorrect? I’ve not seem other projects do it this way, it's generally: "Portions of this software were developed at Acme Inc, copyright 20XX.” > Which ones are you

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

Hi, > Per NOTICE policy > : "Copyright > notifications which have been relocated, rather than removed, from source > files must be preserved in NOTICE” Yes the copyright line needs to be mentioned not the licenser header. > My

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

Hi, > What license information are you referring to? " Licensed under the Apache License” by Cloudera > Which entries in the LICENSE file? Many Apache-licensed projects don't have > NOTICE files. Yes but all ASF projects do, your license mentions Apache Avro, Apache Parquet, Apache iBATIS,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > I really feel that casting a -1 vote, with the vague justification provided > below, really is not sufficient. Details have been provided on their private list I suggest you look there, the issues has been resolved. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

HI, +1 (binding) to graduate on the modified PMC list Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

Hi, Looking at your notice file in the last release it still needs some work: 1. You have included some license information this should be in LICENSE not NOTICE 2. Going on what is listed in the LICENSE file you are missing content from bundled code NOTICE files [1] (see bundling an apache 2.0

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, I’m -1 (binding) on this due to the proposed PMC membership. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > Folks, just as a reminder. We are approaching 72 hours. Please provide your > comments sooner than later! There's no real time limit for discussion to graduate. I just wait for the conversation to die down, but input from other IPMC members would be appreciated. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

Hi Owen and Ryan, Thanks for the detailed responses, I don’t think anything more is needed. I personally think it would be best if you did another release before exiting the incubator, but if you mentors are good with only making two than that should be OK. I’ll follow up on the NOTICE issue

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

HI, > Thanks for making us aware of this. Our community jumped on this and we are > all green now [1] Thanks for doing that. I hope you move the to a more prominent place once you graduate. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

HI, I think the incubator will need more information before voting on this. Has the project filled in a maturity model? This is optional but give the project and the IPMC more information about the project. I notice a few minor things that may need to be sorted out/dicussed: - The incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

HI, > Summarizing follow up on items raised by Justin.. > > - I put up a PR to fix the download link > - The spark summit agenda here does not list the talk. yes. its unfortunate - > the linking. > - On the logos, I kicked on a DISCUSS thread on our dev list already. Thanks for that. There

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.9.3

HI, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - no unexpected binary files - all source files have ASF headers - Can compile from source Re the "Hive and Commons Notice seems outdated” it probably because when the

Re: [MENTORS] Sign-off due on teh 12th May

Hi, Report has been submitted, final sign off stats: DataSketches - 80% DolphinScheduler - 100% Doris - 67% ECharts - 75% Gobblin - 33% Heron - 50% Hivemall - 50% Livy - 75% NLPCraft - 83% PageSpeed - 33% Pinot - MISSING Ratis - 33% S2Graph - MISSING SDAP - MISSING Toree - 67% Training - 100%

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

HI, > IIUC you want us to remove the logos. Correct? What you do is up to the project. But think about what message that sends being on the front page. You may want to read [1]. If any of you are IPMC or ASF members you might wast to read this private thread. [2] Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, Thanks for the detailed answers. > Happy to follow up on private@, if thats deemed more appropriate. That’s up to you I can see one of your proposed PMC members seems to think something needs to b done. he incubator could also request that the board alter the PMC membership, > On the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > Why having inactive PMC members is not a big deal now? What's the point of > keeping them if they r inactive and do nothing or have no interest in the > project? At some point in the future that may become active again or they may plan to be more active in the near future. Having a few

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, One thing I think may need some explanation. I notice a person who has been recently added (not voted) to the project is part of the proposed PMC. As far as I can tell they have had no involvement in the project. I can see a couple of other PMC members who has also had no noticeable

Re: [MENTORS] Sign-off due on teh 12th May

Hi, > Pinot would like to request reporting next month and then back on schedule. Thanks for the notice it will be noted in the report and we look forward to your report next month. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [MENTORS] Sign-off due on teh 12th May

Hi, Current sign off status of podling reports. Good to see Tuweni has 100% sign off from all it mentors. DataSketches - 80% DolphinScheduler - 80% Doris - 33% ECharts - 50% Gobblin - 33% Heron - 50% Hivemall - 50% Livy - 50% NLPCraft - 83% PageSpeed - 0% Pinot - MISSING Ratis - 33% S2Graph -

[MENTORS] Late podling reports

Hi, Mentors can you please make sure podlings get their reports in on time. [1] Note that the board is changing the way it reviews reports and late TLP reports will no longer be accepted. We currently have missing reports from: - Pinot - Ratis - S2Graph - SDAP - Toree Thanks, Justin 1,

[MENTORS] Sign-off due on teh 12th May

Hi, Sign off of reports [1] is due on the 12th May and the incubator report will be submitted on the 13th, due to time zones this may be a little easier than you expect, so please don’t leave it until the last day. Missing sign off are: - Gobblin - Pagespeed - Pinot* - Ratis* - S2Graph* -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

Hi, > Is that the basis for the Apache Software Foundation copyright claim in the > NOTICE file? I believe the ASF copyright is intended to be a statement of copyright of the collective work [1] I‘m sure someone of the legal-discuss list could give a better explanation. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

Hi, > So the NOTICE, to the extent that it intended to provide > accurate notice of who is the copyright owner, is still accurate in > referring to Verizon Media. That is not the purpose of NOTICE. You do not list all of the copyright holders in it. I’ve voted -1 on releases that have done

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

Hi, > thanks a lot for the comments and keeping us honest. I want to make sure we > are on the same page: do you see these issues as critical or they can be > addressed in the consequent release? Next release is fine by me. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

Hi, > Fixed in master. However, there are still questions on hoThw NOTICE file > should look like for binary releases. Generally the way that is handles is too have seperate NOTICE (and LICENSE) files one for teh source release and one for the binary convienance. > These are the model files

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

Hi, > I find no record of Verizon Media or its predecessors (including Yahoo and > Oath) having assigned copyright to Apache, either with respect to the code > that existed at the time the project joined the incubator or with respect > to the authorized contributions made by Lee and others since

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.0.0 [RC1]

Hi, > We are about at the 72hr mark, but only one person from the IPMC has > reviewed and voted. We need two more to be able to close it out. 72 hours in a minimum not a maximum. I suggest you ask and encourage your other mentors to vote. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

Hi, > - I had trouble compiling from source as it required a new version of cradle > than I had on my machine but is incompatible with the latest version of > cradle (7.0) Thanks autocorrect - obviously I meant gradle :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

Hi, +1(binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE is fine but may mention code that is no longer bundled? (e.g mvn) - NOTICE year needs updating - NOTICE content are not correct. There is a number of ALv2 bt of code bundles and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

Hi, > *files*. They are not compiled source code of any language. They are not > executable. We used the extension ".bin" to indicate that they are binary > files and not human readable. No but they are easily confused as binary file. I'd suggest renting them ".dat” rather than “.bin”. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc5 (respin)

Hi, +1 (binding) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.0.0 [RC1]

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER (WIP) exists and mentions some issues - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK - As noted some ASF file do not have ASF headers. Given only 600 files out out 12,000 have ASF licenses there's still a bit of work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.8.0

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is OK and is missing mention of this license [1] - NOTICE is fine - No unexpected binary files - A lot of .yml files are missing an ASF header - Can compile from source Btw the build

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - disclaimer exists - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE is a little odd with Verizon Media copyright line - The are some .bin files in the test resources that like like they may be compiled code. Is there a way to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.3.0

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is OK - NOTICE needs year updating - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

HI, I know the vote has all ready passed but I can see a couple of issues here: - LICENSE is missing the appendix - As noted the NOTICE is not correct. License are not lined in NOTICE they are licensed in LICENSE and need to be the full text. Dependancies don’t need to be listed only that that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc5 (respin)

Hi, -1 (binding) but +1 (binding) as soon as you fix the hash issue and there no need to call another vote. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures correct - hash needs to be a sha256 or sha512 as md5 is no longer recommended - DISCLAIMER exists, thanks for mentioning the issues in here -

[MENTORS] Change in board reporting dates

Hi, The board is changing the way it reviewing reports and all report need to be submitted by the 13th, any report submitted past will be looked at the following month. So it’s important that podling reports are submitted on time, this month the dates are: Wed May 06 - Podling reports due by

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

Hi, Generally a VOTE is held on the dev list first and then on the incubator general list. I assume thesis is just the dev list vote? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

Hi, +1 (binding) Did any of your mentor votes on this release? I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - No unexpected binary files - All ASF files have ASF headers - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [MENTORS] May report timeline - reports due May 2020

Hi, Thanks for the feed back. > 1) Table of contents should have a double sharp prefix. I mean: > > ## Table of Contents Fixed. > 2) Anchors should be all lowercase. i.e. this doesn't work at the table of > contents: Fixed > 3) Project names which are listed at same line/row at Table of

Re: [MENTORS] May report timeline - reports due May 2020

HI, >> - Project names are not clickable (there is an uppercase character problem) Yes indeed that was the issue - thanks! Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [MENTORS] May report timeline - reports due May 2020

hi, > - Title is not formatted Sorry I’m not sure what yo mean by that. > - Project names are not clickable (there is an uppercase character problem) I have notice that but haven’t had a chance to look into what is is happening, I don't think it’s a case issue, but if you have a suggestion

Re: Podling Gobblin Report Reminder - May 2020

HI, > I find it unfair for podling community to report again if mentors missed to > sign off - who are part of IPMC. I’m sorry and sympathise, but given only a month will pass it shouldn’t be too much work to modify the existing report and re-submit. If you read [1] you see it states "Mentors

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

HI, > I just wanted to ensure that this particular podling proposal was not being > unduly focused upon, for whatever reason, consciously or unconsciously. All recent podlings have been asked to make sure that their name is suitable before joining incubation. If we don’t do this Infra may

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

HI, >>> (2) The community is being called AgensGraph Extension and it is very >>> likely that the VP, Brand will not approve. >> >> Regarding the name: One of the 1st efforts will be a renaming of the project. > > Thanks I wanted that acknowledged. I’d suggest that if this is a know issue,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.36.0

HI, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - Didn’t compile from source due to my environment You may want to change the copyright to 2020 in this

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >