> > > lengthy bikeshed painting debate.
>> > >
>> > > Marvin Humphrey
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-112
>> > >
>> > > -
> On 28 Jan 16, at 21:47, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us.
>>
>> Like Windows® or Apple®?
>
>
> oh, snap. True.
>
>
fails to satisfy the beany needs of misguided marketing. (Beany
needs=bean counter needs.)
--
Louis Suárez-Potts
Mobile: +1.416.625.3843 (ET)
Skype: louisiam
Twitter: @luispo
G+: https://plus.google.com/+LouisSuárezPotts
-
To un
> On 02 Sep 15, at 21:51, Ian C wrote:
>
> Before moving it to the attic is there anything that can be done to
> publicise the need for people and try to attract them?
> I would love to see it continue.
The philosophical issues—differences, they’re pretty deep—as well as the
technological pref
> On 02 Sep 15, at 10:28, toki wrote:
>
>
>
> On 02/09/15 10:25, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
>
> This project has been torn between going to the attic, or becoming a
> sub-project of another project, since at least January 2014.
>
>
> On 19 May 2015, at 10:43, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>> On 19 May 2015, at 08:18, Bertrand Delacretaz
>>> wrote:
>>> ...The http://incubator.apache.org/ are way too verbose in my opinion,
&
> On 19 May 2015, at 08:18, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Stefan Reich
> wrote:
>> ...All you'd have to do is connect programmers to projects. Simple. Why all
>> the rules?..
>
> Out of curiosity, where did you find so many rules?
>
> The http
> On 19 Apr 2015, at 01:00, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> wrote:
>
> OK all, discussion has died down, we have 3 mentors, I think it’s
> time to proceed to a VOTE.
>
> I am calling a VOTE now to accept the Climate Model Diagnostic
> Analyzer (CMDA) into the Apache Incubator. The VOTE is open for
> On 30 Dec 2014, at 03:56, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Purtell
> wrote:
>> ...Certainly some projects have a de facto lead that coincide with Chair and
>> I'm pretty sure
>> in some cases that is an honorary arrangement agreed to by the community
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 18:54, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
> But a move of reporting-to authority does not have to change any of
> that, does it?
Depends on how much of an anarchist one is :-) and what is meant by authority,
too, I suppose.
But, to answer the question, I would say, no: it does
Ross, et al.,
Note the change in subject.
I think that one crucial fact about Apache that I love and respect is its
regard for process over ego. It can be dull and unless one rather likes, or at
least understands the value of, bureaucratic processes, can be frustrating,
especially to those in l
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 14:46, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
>
> In Apache there is no such thing as a "Project Leader"
>
> The PMC Chair has no more authority over the project than anyone else.
>
> The PMC Chair absolutely does *not* have the power to dissolve the PMC. Only
> the Board
> On 23 Dec 2014, at 13:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> tl;dr; agree with a problem statement, don't think
> that proposal wording has much to do with solving
> the problem, would love to see mentors do more.
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I was wondering... What
> On 22 Dec 2014, at 11:29, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Aren't there loads and loads of presos, webinars, slides
> etc from various ApacheCons and other FOSS conf's which
> detailed the Apache Way?
These would be where? And, if we don’t already have a “place” for them
(including just a gallery
> On 19 Dec 2014, at 18:30, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>> Are we top posting now?
>>
>> My comments below Ross’
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 16:33, Dennis E. Hamilton
>>&
Are we top posting now?
My comments below Ross’
> On 19 Dec 2014, at 16:33, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> As a participant, I have two concerns about a player-mentor requirement.
>
> 1. Sustainability. In many ways, it is mentors who need to have their
> attention on The Apache Way and c
Neglected to include the username.
It is LouisSuarez
I can probably also use "oulipax," though haven’t tried that option with this
wiki.
louis
Hi
I’d like to be included in the "contributor group" so that I can edit the
Corinthia proposal and otherwise contribute.
thanks
louis
Hi
I’d like to be included in the "contributor group" so that I can edit the
Corinthia proposal and otherwise contribute.
thanks
louis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
Congratulations to all and thanks to Juergen, too. But the words are
not enough; what is, is use.
To that end, I've used the Mac version (and also Linux, though less
so) daily, and it has been great. I've also used it with Google Docs,
with Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac, with Calligra (KOffice) an
I echo: congratulations!
I'm curious: are we--in this case, a more or less undefined subject of
the sentence--alerting any media organizations?
Louis
On 11 January 2012 23:22, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Yes, congratulations!
>
> On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Devin Han wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Ap
+1
-louis
On 2011-06-10 13:41 , Sander van der Waal wrote:
>> Please cast your votes:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
>> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>>
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Sander
> --
I thought I'd reintroduce myself. I first posted last week but over the
weekend, was a) busy with other pressing things, and b) wanted to let others,
especially new voices, speak—now is the time to shape the new community. I've
been involved with OpenOffice.org (and now the ODF) for nearly 11 ye
22 matches
Mail list logo
