Dear Apache Shiro Community,
We are proud and excited to offer Apache Shiro's first stable release
as an Apache Incubator podling!
Version 1.0.0-incubating is available immediately for download here:
http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/download.html
Associated documentation is available here:
On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Apache Shiro Community,
We are proud and excited to offer Apache Shiro's first stable release
as an Apache Incubator podling!
Version 1.0.0-incubating is available immediately for download here:
The download page links to reposity.apache.org.
However repository.apache.org is not to be used for direct
publication to end users, it is for publishing to the main maven repo.
This wasn't clear on the apache infrastructure page - it states that
repository.apache.org is part of the
Hi folks,
congratulation for getting the release out of the door ... :-) ... and
shiro folks (aka JSecurity) did an excellent job.
Regarding the no-frills step-by-step, no room-for-error release
+) it is difficult to write
+) different projects have different tools to release (manual, Ant,
Hi Sigfried,
I guess that's my point. We use M2. I bet 80% (if not more) of
podlings use M2. There shouldn't have to be much thought involved to
get an M2-based project released - a de facto guide should exist and
podlings can deviate from it where allowed and where it makes sense
for their
+1 on that step by step wiki guide.
I'm willing to contribute/discuss as I believe our release process could be
simpler.
Cheers
Francis
On 1 Jun 2010 22:50, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sigfried,
I guess that's my point. We use M2. I bet 80% (if not more) of
podlings use M2.
On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
The download page links to reposity.apache.org.
However repository.apache.org is not to be used for direct
publication to end users, it is for publishing to the main maven repo.
This wasn't clear on the apache infrastructure
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Otherwise we assume the release would have been voted against.
The lack of a DISCLAIMER was reported as part of the vote.
I don't know why it was not considered blocking.
