Sounds good, we will continue the process with the proposed name Twill.
Thanks -Andreas.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
We had similar issue with MetaModel where there are a lot of projects
with name MetaModel but the name was approved given it
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
Andrea,
thanks for the link, we did see that project but thought that it is not
relevant because it has not had any activity for 6 years, so it is probably
dead.
Should we be more concerned about this?
There is a
This is valuable feedback, and I am not quite sure how to deal with this
after the vote has already passed.
I took a look at retwill, and it seems that it has not had any activity
(wiki edits, issues, pull requests, releases, commits) for about 18 months.
In fact, it appears that it was abandoned
We had similar issue with MetaModel where there are a lot of projects
with name MetaModel but the name was approved given it needs to always
mentioned as Apache MetaModel.
I think we could do similar approach with Twill?
- Henry
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org
On 07/11/2013 Andreas Neumann wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
I used a different software named Twill in the
Andrea,
thanks for the link, we did see that project but thought that it is not
relevant because it has not had any activity for 6 years, so it is probably
dead.
Should we be more concerned about this?
-Andreas.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On
I also have a software lib named twill that is not dead:
https://npmjs.org/package/twill
https://github.com/gtanner/twill
(Not that I am suggesting a name change ;))
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
Andrea,
thanks for the link, we did see that project
