Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Responding to a few points in the thread: > Jitendra, So considering how strong of a community this is already and the > success of recent TLP direct projects, what goals do you have for > incubation? And why incubation over straight to TLP? As hinted by a few others, I would like to see the

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Thanks for the feedback. How does Ratis (Latin for raft) sound for the name? A quick search in google doesn¹t show it is used. If this is acceptable, I will update the proposal. We are working on documentation for the user api's as well as the design. We didn¹t consider TLP as the project is

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

FYI, the name 'Kontiki' is in use by Kollective Technology, as a former company name and now brand name [1] [1] http://www.kontiki.com --Mark On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/23/16, 6:19 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Yeah, the project still looks like an internal project, I hardly can find any document about it. I just went through the github project, there is only just one README. I cannot find any wiki pages or other document talking about the roadmap or high level design. I guess the Raft site[1] could

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On 11/23/16, 6:19 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: >On 23 November 2016 at 11:40, Roman Shaposhnik >wrote: >> FIWI: these were my thoughts exactly. In fact, for a second there I >>thought >> that SAP was donating Concur codebase. >> In the spirit of

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

I think we should in principle aim for also a larger diversity in the initial committers for a straight-to-TLP, https://github.com/hortonworks/concur/graphs/contributors does not show anyone that is not working for Hortonworks - but the proposed committers (aka proposed PMC?) have broad ASF

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On 23 November 2016 at 11:40, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > FIWI: these were my thoughts exactly. In fact, for a second there I thought > that SAP was donating Concur codebase. > In the spirit of bikeshedding I propose Apache Thor (or Heyerdahl) 'cuz > you know: raft ;-) As

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:40 AM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > wrote: > > > Hi Jitendra, > > > > > > I gonna take

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:40 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi Jitendra, > > > > I gonna take a deeper look. > > > > My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Jitendra, > > I gonna take a deeper look. > > My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense > solution (https://www.concursolutions.com/). > > To avoid confusion, maybe it would make

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Hi Jitendra, I gonna take a deeper look. My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense solution (https://www.concursolutions.com/). To avoid confusion, maybe it would make sense to choose another name. Regards JB On 11/23/2016 09:29 AM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: Dear

[DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Dear all, We would like to start a discussion on accepting Concur, a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol, into the Apache Incubator. Here is the link to the proposal on the wiki https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ConcurProposal The text of the proposal is included below.