Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-04 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 The big thing here is to make easier for new podlings to follow the guidelines. What about creating a checklist and/or adding this branding details to the tasks in status template? The logo is a bit more trickier, but the disclaimer should be something easy to monitor... On Sat, Jul 2, 2016

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB On 07/02/2016 04:06 AM, John D. Ament wrote: All, As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be included in podling websites. Take

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Suggestion; If such new Incubator logo is to be incorporated on podling sites, could it also be standardized to have a "hover popup" containing the standard text and possibly links to further information (both Incubator-specific as well as podling-specific)? Cheers Niclas On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > As a follow up to the current

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Sounds just right to me. > > I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of > sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory > examination than the number that made it clear

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread John D. Ament
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > All, > > > > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread Ted Dunning
Sounds just right to me. I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory examination than the number that made it clear that they were incubating, but the number of sites that didn't make it incubation

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be > included in podling websites. Here's how I would summarize the spirit of

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be > included in podling websites. > > Take

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be > included in podling websites. +1 It gives a clear indication that the project is under incubation at the ASF. Bonus points for it linking to

[DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-01 Thread John D. Ament
All, As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be included in podling websites. Take https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 as a summary of podling status. 29 podlings presently show