[DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-25 Thread Sam Ruby
https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain. The topic I would like to discuss is what additional input validation should be done. Mailing list names have specific formats. Wit

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-25 Thread Nick Kew
On 26 May 2012, at 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote: > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq > > Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and > placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain. > > The topic I would like to discuss is what additional input validation > should

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-26 Thread sebb
On 26 May 2012 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote: > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq > > Nothing fancy: simple data gathering.  Output will be validated and > placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain. > > The topic I would like to discuss is what additional input validation > should be don

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nick Kew wrote on Sat, May 26, 2012 at 07:39:48 +0100: > > On 26 May 2012, at 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq > > > > Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and > > placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain. > > > > The t

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
sebb wrote on Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:09:48 +0100: > On 26 May 2012 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote: > > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq > > > > Nothing fancy: simple data gathering.  Output will be validated and > > placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain. > > > > The topic I would li

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, May 27, 2012 at 14:12:54 +0300: > Nick Kew wrote on Sat, May 26, 2012 at 07:39:48 +0100: > > > > On 26 May 2012, at 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq > > > > > > Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and >

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-27 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Nice work Sam ;) May I suggest adding some fields to ease data entry even more: 1- A checkbox indicating whether or not the mailing list is for an incubator project or not 2- Another list of checkboxes which are enabled only when the incubator checkbox is enabled: 2.1- Dvelopment 2.2- Commits

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-27 Thread Craig L Russell
On May 27, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Nick Kew wrote on Sat, May 26, 2012 at 07:39:48 +0100: On 26 May 2012, at 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote: https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and placed into svn as input to another t

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-31 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > May I suggest adding some fields to ease data entry even more: > > 1- A checkbox indicating whether or not the mailing list is for an > incubator project or not > 2- Another list of checkboxes which are enabled only when the incubato

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-31 Thread Shane Curcuru
Sweet. It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of existing TLPs / podlings. Personally, I think it would be helpful for the list name field to be a select list for dev/user/commits/etc./Other. I.e. suggest the most common set of names (and pick either user@ or users

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31 May 2012 13:58, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Sweet. > > It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of existing > TLPs / podlings. Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are being created as part of TLP/podling creation. Even for existing TLPs/podling

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-31 Thread Sam Ruby
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 31 May 2012 13:58, Shane Curcuru wrote: >> Sweet. >> >> It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of existing >> TLPs / podlings. > > Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are > being created as par

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-31 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Sam Ruby wrote on Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:38:21 -0400: > It might also make sense for me to create three fields initially, and > make the first three required. Thoughts? I think we accept a minimum of 2 moderators per list... (eg I think private@svn was created with just 2 moderators) --

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-05-31 Thread David Crossley
Sam Ruby wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Shane Curcuru wrote: > >> Sweet. > >> > >> It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of > >> existing > >> TLPs / podlings. > > > > Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are > > being created as part of TLP/podling c

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
V3 of the interface: https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq/incubator Key changes: 1) initially start out with two moderator input fields, both marked as required. 2) a paste of a list of (either comma or space separated) emails will be split across multiple

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-05 Thread David Crossley
Sam Ruby wrote: > V3 of the interface: > > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq > https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq/incubator > > Key changes: > > 1) initially start out with two moderator input fields, both marked as > required. > > 2) a paste of a list of (either comma or space separate

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-06 Thread sebb
On 6 June 2012 05:05, David Crossley wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: >> V3 of the interface: >> >> https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq >> https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq/incubator >> >> Key changes: >> >> 1) initially start out with two moderator input fields, both marked as >> required. >> >> 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-06 Thread Sam Ruby
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:05 AM, David Crossley wrote: > > There was an old conversation about this around 2011-10-10, e.g. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/31601/focus=31662 > suggesting an optional "resourceAlias" attribute. I would love to see a resourceAlias attri

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-06 Thread David Crossley
Sam Ruby wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > > There was an old conversation about this around 2011-10-10, e.g. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/31601/focus=31662 > > suggesting an optional "resourceAlias" attribute. > > I would love to see a resourceAlias attribute

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-06 Thread sebb
On 7 June 2012 02:39, David Crossley wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > >> > There was an old conversation about this around 2011-10-10, e.g. >> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/31601/focus=31662 >> > suggesting an optional "resourceAlias" attribute

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-07 Thread David Crossley
sebb wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Sam Ruby wrote: > >> David Crossley wrote: > >> > > >> > There was an old conversation about this around 2011-10-10, e.g. > >> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/31601/focus=31662 > >> > suggesting an optional "resourceAlias" attrib

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:40 PM, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> >> >> I would love to see a resourceAlias attribute.  Or even a >> >> resourceAliases attribute (allowing multiple names, separated by a >> >> space and/or a comma). >> > >> > Y