Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

2016-12-29 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:40 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:31 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > This is what I'm trying to say with these

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

2016-12-29 Thread John D. Ament
I thought about it a little more. That existing top line makes some sense, but I would say it should link to the ASF release policies and instead say "See the ASF policies around releases in conjunction with this policy" , so it would link to [4] (unfortunately that's a bidirectional link, but I

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

2016-12-29 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:31 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences: > > > > Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

2016-12-29 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences: > > Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers > with information about what is wrong with the release. > Release managers

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

2016-12-29 Thread John D. Ament
This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences: Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers with information about what is wrong with the release. Release managers should consider issues reported as blocking, unless told otherwise by

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

2016-12-29 Thread John D. Ament
I'm planning to add this, what do you think? In order for a podling to receive full permission from the IPMC to execute the release, the release vote must be held on the incubator general list and pass based on the http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes;>standard Package Release

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

2016-12-29 Thread John D. Ament
Dale, Thanks. Before publishing this, I was planning to remove the link on [5]. The policy docs are complete as they stand right now from my point of view. Since [4] points to [5] I think that's fine assuming the link from [5] to [3] goes away. I'm fine with having a link going from [2] to [5]