Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-15 Thread Henry Saputra
Roman, John, Could we add Flink graduation resolution as part of the board meeting agenda for this month from incubator? - Henry On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Indeed! I'll fix it. Thanks, Roman. P.S. I could swear I saw in the report though,

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-15 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Personally, I see nothing wrong with that, but I'd like to understand whether board members would frown on such 'breaking news' addition. Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Roman, John, Could we add Flink graduation resolution as part

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-15 Thread Henry Saputra
Ah ok, I believe the rule was to send email to board @ list to let intention that graduation should be put in the agenda. I hope someone with proper karma to add to the board agenda seeing this email thread. - Henry On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-15 Thread Kostas Tzoumas
Hi Roman, I sent the email to board@ last week after the incubator vote closed following the instructions at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#top-level-board-proposal However, I missed subscribing to board@ first, so my email might be stuck waiting for moderation. Kostas On

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-15 Thread John D. Ament
Personally, the board report was sent on Wednesday. You only concluded your vote on Friday. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Kostas Tzoumas ktzou...@apache.org wrote: Hi Roman, I sent the email to board@ last week after the incubator vote closed following the instructions at

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-15 Thread Henry Saputra
That is ok, we do not have to be part of incubator report. Sorry about the confusion. - Henry On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:17 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Personally, the board report was sent on Wednesday. You only concluded your vote on Friday. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-10 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Good point! Thanks anyway! On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:08AM, John D. Ament wrote: Was it there before I sent out my email? I just copy and paste. Either way I pulled Argus/Ranger from the report as is the norm for non-reporting podlings. Same for Kalumet, log4cxx and NPanday. I'm not sure

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-10 Thread Adunuthula, Seshu
Kylin is a new podling which was approved, but do not see a mention here in this report. Thanks Seshu Adunuthula On 12/9/14, 6:13 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Below is the final copy of the report, ready to be signed off on. I removed non-reporting podlings. Can we get

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-10 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Indeed! I'll fix it. Thanks, Roman. P.S. I could swear I saw in the report though, but you're right. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu sadunuth...@ebay.com wrote: Kylin is a new podling which was approved, but do not see a mention here in this report. Thanks Seshu

Re: [2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-10 Thread Adunuthula, Seshu
Thanks! On 12/10/14, 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Indeed! I'll fix it. Thanks, Roman. P.S. I could swear I saw in the report though, but you're right. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu sadunuth...@ebay.com wrote: Kylin is a new podling which was

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-09 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
John, it seems to be missing my shepherd's comment on Argus project, which is stating the obvious lack of the report. Cos On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:27PM, John D. Ament wrote: All, Please find below the draft board report for December 2014. If anyone has any comments for the miscellaneous

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-09 Thread John D. Ament
Was it there before I sent out my email? I just copy and paste. Either way I pulled Argus/Ranger from the report as is the norm for non-reporting podlings. Same for Kalumet, log4cxx and NPanday. I'm not sure what happened to them. I emailed them asking about the report, they didn't seem to be

[2nd DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - Please review

2014-12-09 Thread John D. Ament
Below is the final copy of the report, ready to be signed off on. I removed non-reporting podlings. Can we get someone from MRQL and Brooklyn to sign off on those reports? Brooklyn specifically has a *lot* of mentors to find no one to sign off on it. BTW, in my last email I incorrectly listed

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-08 Thread John D. Ament
Roman, So here's what I'm seeing for some of why the reports are missing. - log4cxx2 - Likely stuck in moderation limbo. - Argus/Ranger - confused about monthly reporting vs quarterly reporting. - Kalumet - seems like there's only one active member. He brought up the topic of retirement. -

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-08 Thread Christian Grobmeier
PLease note there is a Ripple report in preparation. Log4cxx should be possible to craft a report. in both cases I am a mentor, but my current personal situation prevents me from being as active as I wouldl ike to be. Other people joining as mentors would be welcome (Ripple already got Ross) --

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-08 Thread Christian Grobmeier
I signed the ripple report brought in today and wrote a small log4cxx report myself. I consider this valid as consider myself part of the log4cxx community. I hope this is acceptable, since the podling deadline was before a few days. Please let me know if not and I will revert Thanks! --

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-08 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I signed the ripple report brought in today and wrote a small log4cxx report myself. I consider this valid as consider myself part of the log4cxx community. I hope this is acceptable, since the podling deadline

[DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-07 Thread John D. Ament
All, Please find below the draft board report for December 2014. If anyone has any comments for the miscellaneous section please let me know. I still have to address line lengths, but the report's all here. Please feel free to edit the wiki with any proposed changes. = Incubator PMC report

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report for December 2014 - please review

2014-12-07 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
John, as usual thanks a ton for all of your hard work. I'll add few of my comments directly to the wiki, but all in all it looks good and ready to be submitted. One thing that I'm really concerned about is, to your point, the # of missing reports. In some cases, I'm sure this is just a function