[mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 01:13
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok?
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...The mailing lists derive their power from being focused on specific
Let's try discussing them here and see how it goes.
If something breaks in that model, we will have something to fix. Until
then, we don't have anything to fix so we might as well try it.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:12
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...The mailing lists derive their power from being focused on specific
topics
I disagree, our mailing lists are focused on *communities*, not topics.
...With that said, pTLP and direct-to-TLP issues have no
The main job of the Incubator is to evaluate and develop incoming
projects into eventually becoming TLPs (or to attic those that don't).
So far, this has been done by having them as podlings under the
supervision of the Incubator PMC.
In the case of pTLPs, candidate projects would be at a stage
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...The mailing lists derive their power from being focused on specific
topics
I disagree, our mailing lists are focused on
On Sunday, March 22, 2015, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
In the recent discussions about provisional TLPs and direct-to-TLP
projects we're missing a public place where the proposals (board
resolutions etc) for such projects are discussed and worked on.
Are people ok
I am very much in favor for provisional TLP's and direct-to-TLP's here at the
Apache Software Foundation.
With that said I am very much against the noise here on our incubator lists and
wiki. We should really create a list in the wiki for this kind of endeavor. It
really it should take place
Hi,
In the recent discussions about provisional TLPs and direct-to-TLP
projects we're missing a public place where the proposals (board
resolutions etc) for such projects are discussed and worked on.
Are people ok with using this list and the Incubator wiki for those things?
The Incubator PMC
9:04 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok?
On Sunday, March 22, 2015, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
In the recent discussions about provisional TLPs and direct-to-TLP
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
My only concern is confusion over pTLP and incubator. That's a manageable
concern but this lost is so large I fear it might keep recurring.
Just a word of caution, not an objection.
I agree that
...@toolazydogs.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 07:33
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok?
I am very much in favor for provisional TLP's and direct-to-TLP's here at
the Apache Software Foundation.
With that said I am very much against
Would moving this to members make this a members-only conversation?
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 07:33
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok?
I am very much
On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
My preference would be to ask pTLP advocates which public list they want to
use. Creating a new public mailing list is an option, though the low
visibility of a new list makes such an option less than ideal and the
13 matches
Mail list logo
