Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks for the question, Liang. The performance of Coral (previously named as Onyx) depends on deployment scenarios. We haven't done extensive experiments with Coral+Spark yet. However, in several deployment scenarios we've been looking at, Coral+Beam outperforms direct Spark even though the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Looks a nice project, very interested in checking more detail. How about the performance? Onyx+spark in comparison to directly using spark, whether reduce performance ,or not ? Regards Liang Byung-Gon Chun wrote > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thank you all for the feedback. We changed the project name to Coral. You can find the proposal at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CoralProposal . I will soon send out a voting email. Thanks. -Gon On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Thanks,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks for the information, John! On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Sorry for mid-posting. > > This isn't the list to determine if a project name is suitable. There's a > JIRA project dedicated to that, and if you need a quick answer better to >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks, much appreciated ! Regards JB On 01/31/2018 09:50 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Coral is a good name ! >> > > Thanks! > > >> >> Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Sorry for mid-posting. This isn't the list to determine if a project name is suitable. There's a JIRA project dedicated to that, and if you need a quick answer better to email trademarks@ to get a more precise answer. The question is really going to be, is "Apache Onyx" going to be easily

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > Coral is a good name ! > Thanks! > > Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that case, in > addition of > your ICLA, we would need a SGA (it's not blocker for the project > bootstrapping

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, Coral is a good name ! Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that case, in addition of your ICLA, we would need a SGA (it's not blocker for the project bootstrapping or code donation, but we, at least, will need it later for graduation). On the other hand, if the committers

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

If Coral as our project name is fine, I will start voting in a couple of days. Let me know if you have any concern. Thanks. -Gon On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Thanks for the comments, JB! > My replies are inlined below. > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks for the comments, JB! My replies are inlined below. On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > sorry to be a little bit late on this. > > It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability > layer we want to add in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, sorry to be a little bit late on this. It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability layer we want to add in Apache Beam. I would love to see interaction between the two communities. I have two minor questions: 1. about the name: Onyx sounds very generic and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thank you for all the information! It looks like Surf doesn't work. If possible, we'd like to keep Onyx. Another name we came up with is Coral. Thanks! -Gon On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Did we rule out Onyx for sure? Just because some other

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Did we rule out Onyx for sure? Just because some other project might use it on say github doesn’t necessarily exclude us from having an Apache Onyx? FWIW, I agree that surf is too similar in pronunciation to Apache serf. :) Cheers, — Leif > On Jan 27, 2018, at 07:31, Dave Fisher

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Checking “Serf Software” which sounds the same. (1) there is already Apache Serf (2) Serf is a product from Hashicorp at https://www.serf.io/. This would definitely confuse as it is apparently comparable to ZooKeeper. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 27, 2018, at 3:12 AM, sebb

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

A brief search for 'Surf Software' shows quite a few hits. I have not looked to see if they would be likely to be confused with this project or cause problems for others. But it as though there might be a problem: Surfer - Golden Software surf @ sourceforge Surf Software company On 27 January

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Since we cannot use the name Onyx, we would like to change the project name to Surf. I hope that this name works. -Gon --- Byung-Gon Chun On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Le 26 janv. 2018 21:53, "Byung-Gon Chun" a écrit : On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? > > Thanks for the question, Romain. We have a flexible, efficient runtime that supports

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? > > Thanks for the question, Romain. We have a flexible, efficient runtime that supports various user programs (e.g., Beam and Spark programs). We are taking

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? Otherwise +1 to have it @asf, makes a lot of sense. Le 26 janv. 2018 20:58, "Byung-Gon Chun" a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > Great work -- I think this technology has a lot

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > Great work -- I think this technology has a lot of promise, and I'd love to > see its evolution inside the Foundation. > > Thanks, Davor! > Parts of it, like the Onyx Intermediate Representation [1], overlap with > the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Great work -- I think this technology has a lot of promise, and I'd love to see its evolution inside the Foundation. Parts of it, like the Onyx Intermediate Representation [1], overlap with the work-in-progress inside the Apache Beam project ("portability"). We'd love to work together on this --

[PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Dear Apache Incubator Community, Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OnyxProposal Onyx is a data processing system that aims to flexibly control the runtime behaviors of a job to adapt to varying deployment characteristics