Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Taylor, Thanks for the information. Will check the details out from the website. I went through once. Also,will follow this conversation. Its good to learn this process anyway. Thanks, Dheeban On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:28 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Hi Dheeban, > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Dheeban, tl;dr;: You've kind of stumbled into an early procedural process for adding new ASF projects, but your interest is very much appreciated. That's great that you want to get involved! One of the important things new/potential Apache projects need to do is develop a community. Your

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Team, I am newbie in the open-source contribution world. I have not actively contributed to any open source code base, but am interested in being a part of this one. I have used a lot of open source code. Have debugged some open source code, out of curiosity, have always wondered how such big

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, I would also like to be a mentor for this project.  Thanks,Francis

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

> On May 11, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > I added the 3 mentors to the Wiki. Should we put it up for a vote now? > > -Bryan Discussion has died down and the project has enough mentors, so I would say go ahead. -Taylor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

I added the 3 mentors to the Wiki. Should we put it up for a vote now? -Bryan > On May 11, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > Great to hear that! > > We will update the proposal wiki. > > Matteo > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:32 AM P. Taylor Goetz

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Great to hear that! We will update the proposal wiki. Matteo On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:32 AM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I’d be willing to mentor as well. > > -Taylor > > > > On May 11, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Hi All - > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

I’d be willing to mentor as well. -Taylor > On May 11, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi All - > > That's 2 mentors. Is there a third? > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 6, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi All - That's 2 mentors. Is there a third? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > To be clear, yes, I would. > >> On May 5, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> Anyone else

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

To be clear, yes, I would. > On May 5, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > Anyone else interested in mentoring? > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 1, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi - Anyone else interested in mentoring? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 1, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I had a discussion with Joe and another gentleman involved in Pulsar. > > They asked how long incubation takes. I answered that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi - I had a discussion with Joe and another gentleman involved in Pulsar. They asked how long incubation takes. I answered that it depends. We reviewed some of the steps needed in Incubation particularly: - Release process with correct LICENSE and NOTICE - Community building requirement -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi John, I am trying to decide if I personally wish to mentor Pulsar and will be asking technical questions. IMO this is not appropriate to an Incubator discussion. Anything that surfaces that is appropriate can be brought back to this discussion. There is no intension to subvert Incubator

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

I'm sorry but I'm a bit dumb founded by this part of the thread. I'll apologize up front for my bluntness. In the incubator, we're trying to teach projects to deal with asynchronous communication. The last thing we should be doing is encouraging phone calls/real time meetings. If there are

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > ...Having a lot of Yahoo employees on the Traffic Server Proposal back in 2009 > was also a concern. This is something we were able to easily overcome in > incubation... +1, building a diverse community is a goal of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

I meant to say 35.6% of the shares in my previous posting. Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Yahoo! and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Yahoo! and Yahoo! Japan are NOT two entirely separate entities. According to financial information (see [1] of 2016 Yahoo! held/holds 25.6% of the companies shares. In some areas that is enough to constitute directional power. Maybe, in this case, there are enough Chinese walls between the two

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi - I am in California and could do a webex this Monday. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 27, 2017, at 1:41 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > > > >> On 26.04.2017 23:19, Joe Francis wrote: >> >> Dear Apache Incubator Community, >> >> >> We would like to submit

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Thursday, April 27, 2017 5:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > This proposal looks like something I'd be interested in helping > out with... some basic questions: (1) How does the compare/contrast > w/ Apache Kafka and (2) What is seen as the most applicable use-case > for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Bryan Call wrote: > > Having a lot of Yahoo employees on the Traffic Server Proposal back in 2009 > was also a concern. This is something we were able to easily overcome in > incubation. Building a healthy diverse community is one of the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Dave, Would be happy to have a technical conversation, let us know how you would prefer to have it Joe On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 7:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi, Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Having a lot of Yahoo employees on the Traffic Server Proposal back in 2009 was also a concern. This is something we were able to easily overcome in incubation. Building a healthy diverse community is one of the project's top priorities. -Bryan > On Apr 27, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Pierre Smits

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Certainly, this is one of the main aspects of Incubation surely, to create a healthy community around a codebase and a project. I personally don't think considerations of how large or small a base is pertinent at this stage. The original Apache httpd project had an *extremely* small initial base

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

While considering the project/product interesting I am curious how the proposers and champion see this becoming a success as an ASF podling/project. Currently there seems to be only one adopter (Yahoo), and for most the contributors are paid employees (of Yahoo). Looking at the provided repo, and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> ...Funny aside: the 1st new car I ever bought with my own money was >> a Nissan Pulsar. It was a piece of crap :)... > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > ...Funny aside: the 1st new car I ever bought with my own money was > a Nissan Pulsar. It was a piece of crap :)... Apache Pulsar (incubating): Making Pulsar Great Again ;-) -Bertrand

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

This proposal looks like something I'd be interested in helping out with... some basic questions: (1) How does the compare/contrast w/ Apache Kafka and (2) What is seen as the most applicable use-case for Pulsar? Funny aside: the 1st new car I ever bought with my own money was a Nissan Pulsar. It

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Matteo, Glad to see you and Pulsar are here. John's idea is interesting and need to pay attention on it. There are so many messaging systems in ASF or other organizations, share client libraries between these products really make sense and will bring great benefit for our user. But as

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

On 26.04.2017 23:19, Joe Francis wrote: Dear Apache Incubator Community, We would like to submit the Pulsar proposal to the incubator. Our draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PulsarProposal A quick overview of Pulsar: Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:49 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Or not. Using other projects is not necessarily relevant to whether or not > the proposed podling has a community. > > I have to be careful about committing to Mentoring. I have some interest > in such a project. I'd

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:30 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Its great to see another messaging solution come to the ASF. Does your > platform support any formats like AMQP, STOMP? There are currently many messaging APIs and wire protocol specifications, but for Pulsar we

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Joe, > > Its customary to bring in the entire body of the proposal in the discussion > thread. > > Its good to see that someone stepped up to be Champion. You still need > mentors. Was

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

I wan’t planning on being a mentor, but I might be able to be convinced otherwise. -Bryan > On Apr 26, 2017, at 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Joe, > > Its customary to bring in the entire body of the proposal in the discussion > thread. > > Its good to see that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Joe, Its customary to bring in the entire body of the proposal in the discussion thread. Its good to see that someone stepped up to be Champion. You still need mentors. Was Bryan planning to also mentor the project? While he is a foundation member, he is not on the IPMC. Its great to see

[PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

Dear Apache Incubator Community, We would like to submit the Pulsar proposal to the incubator. Our draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PulsarProposal A quick overview of Pulsar: Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on commodity