My understanding is that ASF provide us some kind of 'legal'
protection (I don't know which one) provided that you have send your
ICLA. Isn't it a type of contract?
Gilles
2007/5/30, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 12:42, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mmm - bzzz -
Noel,
Now that we have 3 votes from IPMC, can we please proceed with the accout
creation for arnuad?
Thanks Henry for giving the +1 for this thread. Besides Yoav has +0 so I
guess there are no objections at all.
Arnaud has been very active in the last two months and he throughly deserves
to be
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Now that we have 3 votes from IPMC, can we please proceed with the accout
creation for arnuad?
Yes. Please have one of your Mentors follow through on the account request.
Had Yoav enough time to familliarize himself with the project, I am sure
he
would have voted +1
The following vote has been open for 6 days, Here is the vote result to
add Arnuad
Simon to the Qpid project.
regards
Carl.
Vote results so far
15 +1 votes
1 0
No -1.
+1 votes
Cliff Schmidt
Paul Frematle
Alan Conway
Kevin Smith
Andrew Stitcher
Rajith Attapattu
Tomas Restrepo
Kim
To clear things up, add my +1 to the vote. Arnaud's activity in the
JIRA looks good.
Watch the '0 votes' bit. Normally we take that to mean a +0, so the
immediate question is Why did Yoav not want to vote +1?, but I think
you meant that he hadn't voted. Plus what Noel just said.
Hen
On
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On 5/29/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always thought (and the documentation at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html) says PPMC votes are
binding. There were plenty of PPMC +1 votes without my vote. If I'm
wrong, it (a) sucks because other PPMC
Hey,
On 5/29/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vote results so far
15 +1 votes
1 0
No -1.
Yes, but I only see two +1 that are binding:
Cliff Schmidt
Paul Frematle
Did I miss a third? A few of us have been reviewing the vote summary and
thread today, and none of
Hey,
On 5/29/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They've put the onus on the IPMC to oversee and conduct all incubating
projects. In practice, that means the IPMC puts their weight behind
the PPMC members' decisions. Practically speaking, unless something
is horribly wrong with
Yoav Shapira wrote:
That's not true. Practically speaking, mentors may not have time to
review an issue that other PPMC members have had plenty of time to
review and vote upon.
That's true, but we are overseeing their -process- not always the
details. I have a great deal of confidence in
Yoav Shapira wrote:
I voted +0, not having had time to review the proposed committer's
contributions.
+1 != +0
I always thought (and the documentation at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html) says PPMC votes are
binding.
It says (P), and the (P) clearly does not belong. Notice
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 07:15, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
LEGALLY PPMC votes mean zilch; this is because the board did not charter
or compose the PPMC, doesn't decompose it, doesn't even oversee it per say.
And a majority of decisions within a (P)PMC has no legal
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 12:42, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mmm - bzzz - that's incorrect. You'll recall you signed a legally binding
document to become a committer?
H... Now when you mention it, it is actually quite interesting.
First of all the ICLA is not a contract (from the little I
12 matches
Mail list logo
