Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi, > Also, please note that I did not cast a vote on this release. I agreed > with Roman's sentiments on needed proper NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER for the > RPMs, but did not get a chance to review the release contents. Ah sorry I missed that as well, but the vote still passes with 3 +1 votes.

Re:Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Thanks Alan! Best regards, Ruilong Huo At 2017-07-11 06:29:00, "Alan Gates" wrote: >Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > >Alan. > >On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > >> Hi IPMC member, >> >> >> The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ

Re:Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Thanks Julian for the clarification! Checked that: 1) Roman Shaposhnik; 2) John D. Ament; 3) Justin Mclean; 4) Alan Gates, are all PMC member of incubator. I have sent another email with their IPMC vote as binding vote for Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release. Best regards, Ruilong Huo At

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Ruilong (and others), If in doubt, look people up at https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html . If a voter’s page has “PMC member of … incubator” then their vote is binding. E.g. https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi, > There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. > So I thought they were non-binding vote:) In which case (if they were non binding votes) the vote would not of passed as you need 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s to pass. Thanks, Justin

[RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi IPMC members, Some refinement are done based on previous announcement for vote result of Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release by counting the +1 vote from IPMC members as binding vote. The Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release IPMC vote is now closed and has passed as follows: [4] +1

Re:Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi Justin, Thanks Justin! If IPMC vote by default is binding vote, I will correct the announcement. There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. So I thought they were non-binding vote:) Best regards, Ruilong Huo At 2017-07-11 11:06:45, "Justin Mclean"

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi, > Overall vote breakdown is as below: > Roman Shaposhnik +1 (non-binding) > John D. Ament +1 (non-binding) > Justin Mclean +1 (binding) > Alan Gates +1 (non-binding) Why are the 3 votes marked as non binding? All 4 people are on the incubator PMC and

[RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi IPMC members, The Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release IPMC vote is now closed and has passed as follows: [4] +1 (binding) votes [0] -1 (binding) votes Overall vote breakdown is as below: Roman Shaposhnik +1 (non-binding) John D. Ament +1 (non-binding) Justin Mclean

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Hi IPMC member, > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. > We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > > The PPMC vote thread

Re:Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi Justin, Thanks for the review and feedback. Best regards, Ruilong Huo At 2017-07-06 07:18:07, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >+1 (binding) > >I checked: >- incubating in name >- signatures and hashes correct >- disclaimer exists >- LICENSE and NOTICE look good >-

Re:Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi John, Do you feel good to have license, notice, and disclaimer for pxf rpm and add binaries for more platforms in the following releases as Ed mentioned? Please vote with +1 if yes. Thanks. Best regards, Ruilong Huo At 2017-07-06 05:52:44, "Ed Espino" wrote: >Roman and

Re:Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi Roman, Thanks for the review and feedback! Given the license, notice, and disclaimer has been added for the jar of pxf, we can incorporate that information to pxf rpm package itself in the next Apache HAWQ release. At 2017-07-06 05:05:08, "Roman Shaposhnik"

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - disclaimer exists - LICENSE and NOTICE look good - It’s hard to check headers in this release but a spot check codn't find any issues. Would be nice if text file like xml and sql files had headers IMO but not a

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Roman and John, I have created the following JIRA to track this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1496 ("Deliver LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER in main PXF RPM") Regarding the comment "its a little odd that you only provide RPMs", this is the project's first attempt at delivering

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:05 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > > Hi IPMC member, > > > > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. > We kindly request that the IPMC now vote

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Hi IPMC member, > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We > kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: >

[VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi IPMC member, The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. The PPMC vote thread is located here:

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Thanks Roman for the verification! We will fix the issue and keep updated > in the community. Thanks for your understanding! Lets take it back to dev@hawq where I can help you guys with the required changes. Thanks, Roman.

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Thanks Roman for the verification! We will fix the issue and keep updated in the community. Best regards, Ruilong Huo On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Hi All, > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We > kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: >

[VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Hi All, The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. The PPMC vote thread is located here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a7c780cf5655679fa5c0cbe5a8d24777cd0439601266260859f935ef@%3Cdev.hawq.apache.org%3E