[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-02-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi all, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Bertrand Delacretaz, Sergio Fernandez, Henry Saputra, Taylor Goetz, Jim Jagielski, Suresh Marru, Daniel Kulp, Chris Nauroth, James Taylor, Greg Stein, John D. Ament, Ted Dunning, Venkatesh Seetharam,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-30 Thread Libin Sun
+1 (non-binding) 2016-01-29 23:51 GMT+08:00 Luke Han : > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Tom Barber > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tom White > wrote: > > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-29 Thread Renaud Richardet
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu < amareshw...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (Binding) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-29 Thread Tom White
+1 (binding) Tom On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-29 Thread Tom Barber
+1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tom White wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tom > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > > The

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-29 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 Olivier On 29 January 2016 at 01:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-29 Thread Luke Han
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Tom Barber wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tom White wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Tom > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 (binding) > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread markus.geiss
+1 (non-binding) Best, Markus .:: YAGNI likes a DRY KISS ::. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:51 AM -0800, "Ashish" wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Sobkowiak Krzysztof
+1 (non-binding) Regards Krzysztof On 28.01.2016 15:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Supun Kamburugamuva
+1 Supun.. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > +1 > > Dan > > > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > > The complete

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Andreas Neumann
+1 (non-binding). -Andreas On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Felix Cheung
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:08 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > > The complete

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Ashish
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:02 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > > The complete discussion thread

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Seetharam Venkatesh
+1 (binding). Thanks! On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:19 AM Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:02 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Greg Stein
+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Chris Nauroth
+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 1/28/16, 6:28 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hi, > >the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > >The complete discussion thread is available here: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread James Taylor
+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Byung-Gon Chun
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > > >+1 (binding) > > > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: > >> > >> +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Gregory Chase
+ 1 (non-binding), and cool name! On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Edward J. Yoon
+1 (binding). On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Gregory Chase wrote: > + 1 (non-binding), and cool name! > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Phillip Rhodes
On Jan 28, 2016 6:28 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) > On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Mayank > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < > venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding). >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:19

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Adunuthula, Seshu
+1 (non-binding) On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Mayank >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
+1 (binding) Man, congrats on a job fantastically well done. This is ASF incubator participation at its best. Expectations are high now. I am looking forward to exemplary governance and speedy graduation. Best of luck, Hadrian On 01/28/2016 09:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Naresh Agarwal
+1 (non-binding) Thanks Naresh On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Man, congrats on a job fantastically well done. This is ASF incubator > participation at its best. > > Expectations are high now. I am looking forward to exemplary governance >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Mayank Bansal
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Mayank On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:19 AM Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:02 AM, John

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
+1(non-binding) - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote: > +1 > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Naresh Agarwal wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks >> Naresh >> On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Hao Chen
+1 (non-binding) Regards, Hao On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote: > +1 > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Naresh Agarwal > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks > > Naresh > > On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Li Yang
+1 (non-binding) On Friday, January 29, 2016, Adunuthula, Seshu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde" > > wrote: > > >+1 (binding) > > > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Amareshwari Sriramdasu
+1 (Binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
> [X] +1 - accept Apache Beam as a new incubating project -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Johan Edstrom
+1 > On Jan 28, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Naresh Agarwal wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks > Naresh > On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Man, congrats on a job fantastically well done. This is ASF incubator >>

[VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. The complete discussion thread is available here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201601.mbox/%3CCA%2B%3DKJmvj4wyosNTXVpnsH8PhS7jEyzkZngc682rGgZ3p28L42Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E As reminder the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Here's my +1 of course. Regards JB On 01/28/2016 03:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. The complete discussion thread is available here:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Suresh Marru
+ 1 (binding). Suresh > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Prasanth Jayachandran
+1 Thanks Prasanth > On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote: > > +1 > > Supun.. > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Dan >> >> >> >>> On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Joe Witt
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. >> >> The complete

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Alexander Bezzubov
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

2016-01-28 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
+1 (non-binding) > On 28 Jan 2016, at 15:59, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Fernández >> wrote: