The Apache Stratos project was voted into the Incubator but the RESULT tag
was never added to the vote thread. Closing vote to clean up the Incubator
voting status page.
-Jake
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201306.mbox/%3CCAKQbXgANiJ6Px%2BcBtW_oRc2wQbV9CEQeOHXFCQ8xQy9
Thanks Ross for seeing this through.
Azeez
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
>
> Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
>
> There are no -1 vo
Ross - huge thanks. Great champion-ing.
Paul
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Resending with [RESULT] tag as (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
>
>
> On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
> >
> > Podling committe
Very cool :-). Thanks Ross and everyone!
Sanjiva.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Resending with [RESULT] tag as (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
>
>
> On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
> >
> > Podling comm
Resending with [RESULT] tag as (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler wrote:
> This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
>
> Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
>
Woot. Thanks Ross!
On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler wrote:
> This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
>
> Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
>
> There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding an
This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
(note some actions require the support of your mentors).
There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1 votes.
It is not my intention to tally the votes. I realise
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Tammo
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Supun..
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to acc
+1
Thanks,
Supun..
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incu
+1
On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or other
+1
Dan
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The accepta
+1
...ant
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The
On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:19 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> ...
>> It's inconceivable to me that this will have an ounce of impact on either
>> someone of Sanjiva's accomplishments or a future podling with the momentum of
>> Stratos, but to ensu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Marlon
On 6/16/13 12:15 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks Milinda
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski
>>
+1
Ruwan
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Milinda Pathirage <
milinda.pathir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> Milinda
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
>...
> It's inconceivable to me that this will have an ounce of impact on either
> someone of Sanjiva's accomplishments or a future podling with the momentum of
> Stratos, but to ensure that my positive assessment is communicated
> unequivoc
Good on you. Keep it up.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Milinda Pathirage <
milinda.pathir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> Milinda
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Please don't apologize for a change that is proper and Right. In fact,
> when you look at the *actual* change, it is awesome. It is a clear
> benefit for the podling and project, and a demonstration of WSO2's
> generosity around the trademarks
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Milinda
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incu
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or ot
+1 (binding)
2013/6/15 Ross Gardler :
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Please don't apologize for a change that is proper and Right. In fact,
> when you look at the *actual* change, it is awesome. It is a clear
> benefit for the podling and project, and a demonstration of WSO2's
> generosity ar
Please don't apologize for a change that is proper and Right. In fact,
when you look at the *actual* change, it is awesome. It is a clear
benefit for the podling and project, and a demonstration of WSO2's
generosity around the trademarks that it has worked to build.
There should not be a need to a
Not "your bad". An obvious change based on discussion.
IMO, I say "Marvin is being overly pedantic."
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Marvin,
>
> That change was agreed in the discuss thread. I failed to look to see if it
> had been made before I called the vote. My bad.
>
Marvin my apologies - I didn't get a chance to do it immediately and then
because I don't have edit rights currently I asked Azeez to edit that
sentence in but that was a few days later ..
As Ross said that's what I sent via email before and in any case its a
positive thing for the proposal.
Howe
Marvin,
That change was agreed in the discuss thread. I failed to look to see if it
had been made before I called the vote. My bad.
Ross
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 15 Jun 2013 19:56, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
> -0, because the proposal was not frozen and ha
-0, because the proposal was not frozen and has been edited since the VOTE
started.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47
Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos pro
: Ross Gardler
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 2:49 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project
>I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
&g
+1 (non-binding)
Regards
Lahiru
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incub
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> p
+1
On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or othe
+1 (non-binding)
thanks,
Thilina
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -Sebastien
>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
> nandana@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> >> I would like to
+1 (non-binding)
-Sebastien
On Jun 15, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
wrote:
> On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>>
>> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
>>
On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwis
On Jun 14, 2013 11:50 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
>
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or othe
+1 (non-binding)
thanks
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Indika Kumara >wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > ~ Indika
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ross Gardler <
> rgard...@opendirective.com
+1 (binding)
Paul
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Indika Kumara wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> ~ Indika
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ross Gardler >wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the
+1 (non-binding)
~ Indika
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or o
+ 1 (binding)
Suresh
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or o
On Jun 14, 2013 5:50 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
>
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or other
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Amila Jayasekara
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> AmilaJ
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Nirmal Fernando >wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
AmilaJ
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Azeez
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler <
> rgard...@opendirective.com
> > >wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Azeez
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler >wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos pr
+1 (binding)
Azeez
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy
+1.
Deepal
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
+1 binding.
Good luck guys!
- Henry
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, at 04:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or
I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
separate issue that
52 matches
Mail list logo
