Hi,
Thank you all for voting and providing your inputs.
The vote has passed with three +1 binding votes and no -1 or 0 votes.
+1 (binding):
Sergio
Henri
Sebastian
I will follow up on Monday, on the next steps for the release.
Anirudh
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Sebastian
+1
- checked signatures
- checked building from source under ubuntu 16
On 19.05.2018 19:25, Hen wrote:
I am only reviewing the "diff -r" between RC2 and RC3.
Confirmed that the DevGuide.md is removed.
There is a fix ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10837 )
to Dockerfiles,
I am only reviewing the "diff -r" between RC2 and RC3.
Confirmed that the DevGuide.md is removed.
There is a fix ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10837 )
to Dockerfiles, and a pom.xml fix adding a parent tag to the scala-package.
These seem fine and rectifies the blocking item
Hi,
> I had a look at the files and found that the key required to verify the
> signature is not contained in the KEYS file in the tar ball.
AFAIK having the KEY file in the tar ball is not really helpful at all as it
could be modified and republished. The KEY file needs to be stored
Hi,
I had a look at the files and found that the key required to verify the
signature is not contained in the KEYS file in the tar ball. It has to
be downloaded from an external keyserver.
Not sure about the consequences of that, is it a minor thing or should a
new RC be cut?
Best,
+1 (binding)
So far I've checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* LICENSE & NOTICE files look good despite the many third-party code (CC-BY
files from RC2 are gone)
* no binary files in the source
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
candidate RC3.
As suggested by Justin and Henri, we have removed the two category b
license files: DevGuide.md from the release source tarball.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
