Exactly, 1.2.2 addressing the warning issue. Specially since 1.3.0 is being
already discussed at dev@. Anyway, the podling can learn from these things.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 00:34 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Agree with Dave: incubating releases are not cheap…
>
> Also agree. Seems to me
Hi,
> Agree with Dave: incubating releases are not cheap…
Also agree. Seems to me like something that could be improved on in a later
release - release early and often! [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
Agree with Dave: incubating releases are not cheap...
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 20:02 Anirudh wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thank you for your inputs. To give more context, the reason we are doing
> the release is to fix a backwards incompatible change with the save_params
> API. This issue impacted some of
Hi Dave,
Thank you for your inputs. To give more context, the reason we are doing
the release is to fix a backwards incompatible change with the save_params
API. This issue impacted some of our users and the warning message in RC0
showed an alternative API for one use case but not the other when
Mentors all - Releases are not cheap and we are all volunteers.
Can we teach Release Managers to have a little more judgement about when to
pull a release?
It seems to be too risk adverse to cancel this vote due to a warning message.
My 2 cents.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 2,
Hi,
We are cancelling this vote because we need to improve the warning message
when users use a deprecated API: `save_params`. We will address the issue
and send out a new release for another vote.
Thanks,
Anirudh
+1.
I reviewed the diff between this release and the last.
Hen
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Anirudh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
> candidate RC0.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>
Hi Sergio,
The 1.2.0 release notes have been added to NEWS.md. Thanks for pointing
about CODEOWNERS file. Agree that it is not required in the source release
and I will add its removal to the release steps so that it can be removed
next time.
Anirudh
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Sergio
+1 (binding)
So far I've checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* LICENSE & NOTICE files look good
* no binary files in the source release
* clean build (osx 10.12.6)
Some minor details I'd like to
+1 (binding)
Tested checksum, signature and compilation on ubuntu 16.04.
-sebastian
On 22.06.2018 21:15, Anirudh wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
candidate RC0.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
Vote
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
candidate RC0.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/52a6487bc1389d8865ccc0e42ade49
11 matches
Mail list logo