[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

The vote for releasing Apache Toree 0.1.0 (incubating) passed with 4 binding "+1" votes, and no "0" or "-1" votes. Binding votes: Luciano Resende +1 Josh Elser +1 Hitesh Shah +1 Katherine Marsden +1 Thank you for the participation! Signed, Chip Senkbeil On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:13 PM Chip

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

+1 to the release then. Src tarball looks good with previous comments from others. I would suggest fixing or removing the script for the next release as it is a bit confusing to have it not pass. Best Katherine Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 26, 2017, at 7:43 PM, Luciano Resende

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

+1 (binding). Verified sigs/checksums. DISCLAIMER files in all 3 bundles. Source tarball is clean. License and Notice file look fine though I agree with Josh's comment on the copyright statements within the License file. Shedding more light on the source of the copyrights would be good. I have

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * xsums/sigs OK > * Could build src and pip tarballs > * L look OK with caveats > * DISCLAIMER present > > While I appreciate the obvious effort that went into the assembly of your > LICENSE file, there are

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Katherine Marsden wrote: > On 2/21/17 12:13 PM, Chip Senkbeil wrote: > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree >> (incubating) version 0.1.0. >> > > I have a question about checksums and really about the validation

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

+1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK * Could build src and pip tarballs * L look OK with caveats * DISCLAIMER present While I appreciate the obvious effort that went into the assembly of your LICENSE file, there are some issues: * The Copyright clauses are disjoint from the bundled software. How do

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

On 2/21/17 12:13 PM, Chip Senkbeil wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree (incubating) version 0.1.0. I have a question about checksums and really about the validation script in the release: etc/tools/verify-release. Should I be concerned about the below or

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

It has been a while and we have not received any other IPMC binding vote other than myself. Should I consider this lazy consensus and recommend the podling to proceed with publication of the release? On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > ping, any other

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

ping, any other volunteers to review the release candidate ? On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified licenses, signatures, overall layout for the three distros > packages, no binary jars on source distro, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

+1 (binding) Verified licenses, signatures, overall layout for the three distros packages, no binary jars on source distro, On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Chip Senkbeil wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree > (incubating) version

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

Anyone available to help us get the vote started? On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:13 PM Chip Senkbeil wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree > (incubating) version 0.1.0. > > A vote on this release has passed within the Toree PPMC. > > PPMC

[VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Toree (incubating) version 0.1.0. A vote on this release has passed within the Toree PPMC. PPMC vote result thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/44231a84f4034482b81bd034d800e1f03243e21894da8550a75ae389@ PPMC vote thread: