Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

Thanks Ryan, Let me look into this right away. On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Ryan Blue wrote: > -1 (binding) > > There are a few things that could be improved, but my -1 is because the > release tarball doesn’t match the release tag (inclusion of > .example-image),

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

-0 I started a review and noticed that the RELEASE_NOTES.md is for 0.1.0 and the copyright year in NOTICE should be updated. I’ll stop for now. Regards, Dave > On Nov 3, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Ryan Blue wrote: > > -1 (binding) > > There are a few things that could be

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

-1 (binding) There are a few things that could be improved, but my -1 is because the release tarball doesn’t match the release tag (inclusion of .example-image), some files are missing the license header, and there is no mention in the license file of mesos-protobuf that’s included in the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

+1 -- Checked Headers -- Checked License -- Checked DISCLAIMER and Incubator policies On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1). > > The PPM vote thread: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

Here is my +1, any other volunteers to verify/vote for the release. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1). > > The PPM vote thread: >

[VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1). The PPM vote thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01527.html And the result: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01539.html Tag: v0.2.0-incubating-rc1