Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

As Director as well as mentor, YES. > On Nov 1, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >> >> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community >> has voted [2] to graduate from

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > The VOTE to graduate Groovy to the top-level project has passed... Congrats! Great job Groovy team, let me add my belated +1 as a happy Groovy mentor (retired from that role soon ;-) (no need to change the tally, you

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On 11/02/2015 07:53 AM, John D. Ament wrote: I certainly hope that people don't just blindly vote +1 on graduation >>threads. I know I don't. >> >>Now, if you had asked this same question on the kylin graduation thread, >>I'm not sure you'd get as solid of an answer as groovy. >> >> > > >It

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:25AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote > >thread, duh... > > > >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 on > >the vote.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On 11/02/2015 01:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:25AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > >On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote > >thread, duh... > > > >Anyway, back to Rich's question:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:11AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 01/11/15 20:30, Rich Bowen a écrit : > > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > >> has voted [2] to graduate from the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Le 01/11/15 20:30, Rich Bowen a écrit : > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community >> has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 > +1s >> total, 5 are binding:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote > > thread, duh... > > > > Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On 11/02/2015 07:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > >On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote > >thread, duh... > > > >Anyway, back to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote thread, duh... Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 on the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Nov 2, 2015 07:43, "Rich Bowen" wrote: > > > > On 11/02/2015 07:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >>> >On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >Thanks for sending this

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s > total, 5 are binding: > > Guillaume Laforge > Cédric

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote thread, duh... Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 on the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the project is ready? Looks like a rhetorical question, this

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

I certainly don't want to limit discussion but if anyone hasn't seen it yet, here is the direct link to our self assessment against the maturity metrics (completed with the assistance of our mentors in particular Bertrand): https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc On 2

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

The VOTE to graduate Groovy to the top-level project has passed with 15 binding +1s and 3 non-binding +1s. No 0 or -1 votes were casted. Binding: Chris Mattmann Konstantin Boudnik Julian Hyde Marvin Humphrey Emmanuel Lécharny Sergio Fernández Steve Loughran

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Yup, and as Marvin said it is 'should' which doesn't imply a compulsion. I am going to wrap the vote now. Thanks, Cos On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:12PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Cos, > > You mean this line? > > The resolution >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding). Thanks, Roman. P.S. I must say that Groovy was one of the most rewarding podlings to mentor. It truly has become an *Apache* Groovy! On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > And with Jim's late response to the Groovy community invitation to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Cos, You mean this line? The resolution should be proposed on the general incubator list before a VOTE is started to allow feedback. John On Fri,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

That line says "should", and therefore the DISCUSS wasn't absolutely required. Let's move on. Marvin Humphrey On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 3:12 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Cos, > > You mean this line? > > The resolution >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

I have asked to remain on the PMC, but I am +1 whether or not I am. +1 binding > On Oct 28, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

The only thing that catches me off guard is lack of a discuss thread. But I can give +1 On Oct 28, 2015 16:26, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

And with Jim's late response to the Groovy community invitation to join the PMC the final list going into the resolution will look like this Cédric Champeau Paul King Guillaume Laforge Pascal Schumacher

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

John, according to [1] the discussion could be done inside of the voting and isn't explicitly required. That was my only motive going to the [VOTE] directly. Regards, Cos [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#ipmc-top-level-recommendation On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:35AM,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 10/29/2015 02:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: + 1 (binding) On Wednesday, October 28, 2015, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+ 1 (binding) On Wednesday, October 28, 2015, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 > +1s > total, 5 are binding: > > Guillaume Laforge

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > +1 with change to the email addresses to @apache.org > > -Jake > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 with change to the email addresses to @apache.org -Jake On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 > +1s >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Per suggestions on this thread and thanks to Marvin's effort, the emails of the proposed PMC will be updated on the draft with the @apache.org addresses as in: Cédric Champeau Paul King Guillaume Laforge Pascal

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding) good luck, guys! On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 > +1s > total, 5 are binding: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Le 29/10/15 02:43, Marvin Humphrey a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > The incubation checklist looks good. The language of the graduation resolution looks good, but one thing: Cédric Champeau

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (not binding) Jacques Le 28/10/2015 21:26, Konstantin Boudnik a écrit : Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s total, 5 are binding: Guillaume Laforge Cédric Champeau

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding) > On 28 Oct 2015, at 20:26, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s > total, 5 are binding: > >Guillaume Laforge >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (bindings) Jean-Louis Le jeu 29 oct. 2015 12:17, Konstantin Boudnik a écrit : > Per suggestions on this thread and thanks to Marvin's effort, the emails of > the proposed PMC will be updated on the draft with the @apache.org > addresses > as in: > > Cédric Champeau

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > +1 (bindings) > > Jean-Louis > > Le jeu 29 oct. 2015 12:17, Konstantin Boudnik a écrit : > >> Per suggestions on this thread and thanks to Marvin's effort, the emails of >> the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >>> The incubation checklist looks good. The language of the graduation >>> resolution looks good, but one thing: >>> >>> Cédric Champeau >>> Paul King >>>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Agree with the use of @apache.org addresses 100% - should've been caught earlier by the mentors (shame on my, particularly, for submitting without re-checking this bit). If people here feel like restarting the vote - I'd be happy to do it. If no one has a strong opinion about the re-voting - I

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator. > > [ ] +0 Don't care. >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Looked over the mailing lists, JIRA, releases. Project seems to be ticking over nicely. Good luck! Julian > On Oct 28, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > +1 (binding, reiterating my earlier vote on dev@groovy) > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:26PM,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator. > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator because ... +1 I lurked on the Groovy dev list for a while and they did great. The

[VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s total, 5 are binding: Guillaume Laforge Cédric Champeau Paul King Jochen Theodorou Pascal Schumacher Emmanuel Lécharny

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding, reiterating my earlier vote on dev@groovy) On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:26PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s > total, 5 are binding: >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

++ -Original Message- From: Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> Reply-To: <general@incubator.apache.org>, <general@incubator.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM To: <general@incubator.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from t

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

[X] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator. Obviously ! Le 28/10/15 22:14, Marvin Humphrey a écrit : >> >> I lurked on the Groovy dev list for a while and they did great. The >> community handled some pretty challenging licensing stuff well (stars >> to Paul King for doing some heavy