So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
resolution summary.
John
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:15:33 PM Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
On Feb 8, 2015, at 4:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org
wrote:
So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
resolution summary.
Nevermind, got thrown off
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org
wrote:
So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
resolution summary.
Nevermind, got thrown off in my search by a late vote. I just retired them
from podlings.xml and will remove them from the board
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:57:28 AM Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
Yep, added a retired section.
John
On Feb 8, 2015, at 4:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org
wrote:
FWIW: Cos and I were planning to finalize the retirement steps today.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:01 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:57:28 AM Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
Yep,
Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
John
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:06:51 PM Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
FWIW: Cos and I were planning to finalize the retirement steps today.
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:59:21 PM Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org
wrote:
Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:06 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:59:21 PM Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org
wrote:
Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
Nah, its cool. I've initiated all the required steps and updated the website.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path at this point:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path at this point:
+1 (non-binding)
-Taylor
On Jan 30, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general
+1 [sadly]
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:13PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path at this point:
+1 (binding)
On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path at this point:
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
+1 but it looks like a few people are interested in using and working on
that code, please make sure clear instructions are given to them about
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015, 23:15, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org
wrote:
T his is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...We had a vote thread about a month ago: http://s.apache.org/HIF ...
And I voted -1 at that time (http://s.apache.org/Vqa) but my concern
has been addressed, hence my +1 above.
-Bertrand
+1
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path at this point:
http://markmail.org/thread/litmh5wmwbclrk6n
http://s.apache.org/Efn
+1 to retire. The half full aspect is that it looks like people are
doing something more useful with their time.
Hadrian
On 01/21/2015 05:19 PM, jan i wrote:
+1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
support has to be terminated at a point.
rgds
jan i
On
+1
It's a cool idea, but the technology direction has gone a different way.
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:15:33 PM Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:28 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
...Let's cancel this vote and have at least Cos send them a note saying many
of us in the IPMC think you should retire (but more nicely/PC). Give them
72 hours to provide feedback
+1, after that I'm ok to vote on
...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed
npanday-dev@ with the reminder about missing report.
And I have raised
-
From: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org javascript:;]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed
npanday
Shaposhnik
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Mentors should raise the issue with the podling
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed
npanday-dev@ with the reminder about missing report.
And I have raised the flag about project's issues on the general@
before
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling...
-1 for now.
Unless I missed something I don't see any mention of this on the
NPanday mailing list at
Wow - thanks for your diligence Bertrand. I support this -1 unless Bertrand
made a mistake.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:02 AM
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling...
-1 for now.
Unless I missed something I don't see any
Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent then
maybe the problem doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
A VOTE should be a formality used on the few occasions where our bye-laws
require them. It certainly should not, IMHO, be a stick to wave
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent
then maybe the problem
doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
The only active mentors left on the
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
And I have raised the flag about project's issues on the general@ before. As
far as I can tell this whole discussion about NPanday is going on for about a
year now (by very modest
...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
Shaposhnik
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote
[mailto:c...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
And I have raised
Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
And I
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
NPanday entered incubator on 13th of August 2010:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/npanday.html
Up until 2012 the poddling was doing reasonably well,
producing two releases and adding mentors and
committers.
retirement for NPanday poddling
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
NPanday entered incubator on 13th of August 2010:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/npanday.html
Up until 2012 the poddling was doing reasonably well,
producing two releases and adding
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
NPanday entered incubator on 13th of August 2010:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/npanday.html
Up until 2012 the
38 matches
Mail list logo
