The vote for releasing Apache AsterixDB (0.8.8-incubating) and Hyracks
(0.2.17-incubating) (RC1) passes, with
5 binding +1s,
0 non-binding +1s, and
0 -1 or +/-0 votes.
Binding +1s:
- Till Westmann
- Ate Douma
- Chris Mattmann
- Henry Saputra
- Justin Mclean
I've gone ahead and tried to capture
On 23 Feb 2016, at 15:11, Justin Mclean wrote:
I’ve also added issues for the other fixes and improvements in the
source [1] and binary [2] artifacts.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1319
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1320
Looks good. Changing my
Hi Tim,
> I’ve also added issues for the other fixes and improvements in the source [1]
> and binary [2] artifacts.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1319
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1320
Looks good. Changing my vote to +1 binding.
RE the EPL
Hi Justin,
I’ve also added issues for the other fixes and improvements in the
source [1] and binary [2] artifacts.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1319
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1320
Would you consider changing your vote?
Thanks,
Till
On 22 Feb
Hi Justin,
I think that the version of RainbowVis-JS that is part of the release is
indeed used under
the MIT-licensed.
There reasons are that
a) it says so in the header of the file
b) the file has not been modified since Mar 28 2014
c) the author of the file stated on a GitHub issue [1] on
In addition to Justin's notes about the release, I believe there may be
some confusion on your part about binding vs non-binding votes.
PPMC members binding votes only count towards personnel changes. IPMC
votes count towards releases. Of those you listed as binding, only the
following are
Hi,
Sorry but -1 (binding) due to source release containing EPL licensed software
I checked the source release:
- incubating in release name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing a few thing and incorrectly lists licenses (see below)
- NOTICE year is incorrect
If it's still useful, please count my "+1". (Sorry for missing it earlier.)
Chen
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Please verify and vote on the first binary and second source release of
> Apache AsterixDB. Source-wise, is an update of 0.8.7
Hi Everyone,
Please verify and vote on the first binary and second source release of
Apache AsterixDB. Source-wise, is an update of 0.8.7 with bugfixes and
changes to our license files and packaging to make a compliant binary
release possible. Many thanks to Ate for his tremendous effort in