[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-27 Thread Daniel Dekany
Vote for release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating) passed with the following results: 5 binding "+1" votes, no binding "0", 1 binding "-1" votes. Binding votes on general@incubator.apache.org: Jacopo Cappellato +1 binding Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1 binding John D. Ament +1 binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 (binding) Jacopo Cappellato On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating. > > PPMC Vote Calls (2 cancelled votes, the 3rd

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-23 Thread John D. Ament
+1 binding Ideally when sending the vote, use the commit hash in the URL - https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=shortlog;h=b9ca91dd5c3b04121f5ddcb9f6194c1e7931ba2c A general question - should the copyright dates include the project's origin date? On Wed, Jan 20,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
Friday, January 22, 2016, 9:13:15 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > There are unexpected jars in source release but this will be fixed in a later > release. [1] > > I checked: > - incubating in release name > - disclaimer exists > - license and notice correct > - unexpected

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
Friday, January 22, 2016, 6:29:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Maybe it's too late or has been already reported but at 1st glance > it was not obvious to me that, after downloading/installing Ant and Ivy, I > should > have copied ivy.jar in ant/lib to be able to build. > > Else you get this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Sergio Fernández
Once I had time to check this new attempt, I vote +1 (binding) to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01. On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > I'd also suggest that you name each release candidate in order e.g rc1, > rc2, rc3 etc etc rather than

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Now there is (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-15). Thanks for that. > I have red the related ASF documents back then, and I don't understand > how can this lead to any legal problem since: > - These binaries were contributed directly to the project > - Their origin is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding There are unexpected jars in source release but this will be fixed in a later release. [1] I checked: - incubating in release name - disclaimer exists - license and notice correct - unexpected binary files in source release (jars) - all source files have Apache headers - can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/21/16, 11:52 PM, "Daniel Dekany" wrote: >Friday, January 22, 2016, 1:08:36 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> If may be (but unlikely IMO) that this applies [1]. Best to ask on >> legal discuss to confirm. > >I have red the related ASF documents back then, and I don't

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Justin, Podling has decided to keep their old method having RCs out for a > while for integration testing. It’s only a suggestion. It’s totally up to the PMC how they name their release candidates. > That's was the source I vote -1,because FMPOV that was not properly handled > in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) quickly checked legal files (disclainer, license and notice) and build from source without problem. Regards JB On 01/20/2016 08:26 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Maybe it's too late or has been already reported but at 1st glance it was not obvious to me that, after downloading/installing Ant and Ivy, I should have copied ivy.jar in ant/lib to be able to build. Else you get this error: <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Yes, they could be generated as part of the build, but > that wasn't done yet, and frankly that would just complicate the test > suite without practical benefits. Is there a JIRA to fix this for the next release? If may be (but unlikely IMO) that this applies [1]. Best to ask on legal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-21 Thread Daniel Dekany
Friday, January 22, 2016, 1:08:36 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> Yes, they could be generated as part of the build, but >> that wasn't done yet, and frankly that would just complicate the test >> suite without practical benefits. > > Is there a JIRA to fix this for the next release? Now

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Dekany
Those are artifacts for unit-testing functionality that needs jar files as input. Yes, they could be generated as part of the build, but that wasn't done yet, and frankly that would just complicate the test suite without practical benefits. Their content is mostly just text files, with the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Dekany
Oh no... So what should I do now? Cancel the vote and restart it with the same version etc., or is this correction enough: The "+1" voting box was incorrectly labelled. Please vote according to this: [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-20 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Oh no... So what should I do now? Cancel the vote and restart it with > the same version etc., or is this correction enough: Please keep this VOTE going. It's just a typo, the intent is clear and there are no real

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I notice the release contains several jars: ./src/test/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/webapps/config/WEB-INF/lib/templates.jar ./src/test/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/webapps/config/WEB-INF/lib/WebappLocalFreemarkerServlet.jar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-20 Thread Adam Bordelon
[x] -1 Do not release this package as Apache Myriad 0.1.0-incubating because it is actually Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating I am +0, however, to releasing it as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi

[VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-19 Thread Daniel Dekany
Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating. PPMC Vote Calls (2 cancelled votes, the 3rd is the final iteration): 1.