Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-03 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
Congratulations to all and thanks to Juergen, too. But the words are not enough; what is, is use. To that end, I've used the Mac version (and also Linux, though less so) daily, and it has been great. I've also used it with Google Docs, with Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac, with Calligra (KOffice)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: I have no reason to believe that the remediation Rob speaks of has anything to do with any part of OpenOffice.org. You mean except for Rob's own statement ? But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-02 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
, 2012 23:21 To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1 On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: I have no reason to believe that the remediation Rob speaks of has anything

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: if IBM (and Rob) know of an IP issue in the code base This is not a _if_ there is an affirmative public statement by Rob that this the case  The fact that there has been no such revelation has to be sufficient at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-01 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
I trust that the Patent issues raised by Rob Weir on this mailing-list in http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cof1a1f1f97.0ba57c1e-on852578a4.004ec606-852578a4.004fc...@lotus.com%3E have been disclosed and addressed to the satisfaction of the IPMC ? Norbert

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1 I trust that the Patent issues raised by Rob Weir on this mailing-list in http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cof1a1f1f97.0ba57c1e-on852578a4.004ec606-852578a4.004fc...@lotus.com%3E have been disclosed and addressed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-01 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: @Norbert, I don't see any mention of patent issues in that message. it says: But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony has done IP remediation at many levels. Where we've worked around things, we'll

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-01 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1 has concluded. The ballot passed. VOTE TALLY +1: IPMC members: +1 Marvin Humphrey +1 Dave Fisher +1 Jim Jagielski For reference see also the vote thread on ooo-dev

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
not applicable to LibreOffice and its inheritance from OpenOffice.org ? - Dennis -Original Message- From: Norbert Thiebaud [mailto:nthieb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 22:31 To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-30 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/26/12 12:44 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice.org. This release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-30 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:37:10 +0200: On 4/26/12 12:44 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC midnight Wednesday, 1 May: 2012-05-01 24:00 UTC. I did a mistake here, May 1th is on Tuesday and not on Wednesday. My initial intention

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-27 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/26/12 12:44 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice.org. This release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 25, 2012, at 6:44 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote will be open for more than 5 days. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-26 Thread Marvin Humphrey
2012/4/25 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)   [ ]  0 Don't care   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 IPMC * Signatures and sums look good. * RAT report at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-26 Thread Dave Fisher
I already voted +1 IPMC in the ooo-dev voting thread. Just noting that here. AOO 3.4 (incubating) Vote is now at 2 +1 IPMC votes. Regards, Dave On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:28 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: 2012/4/25 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: [ ] +1 Release this package as

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-25 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice.org. This release candidate provides the following important