Binding +1s:
- Daniel Gruno
- Josh Elser
- John D Ament
- Justin McClean
- Sergio Fernández
Non-binding +1s: None
0s: None
-1s: None
With 5 binding +1s and no -1s, the vote has passed.
I will prepare the release and announcement once my break day is over :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/17/
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
> > Looks like they're using the hosted version in the site:
> > https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.3/jquery.min.js
>
> If it not bundled then there's no need to mention it in LICENSE.
>
Exactly. Just wanted to clarify where t
Hi,
> Looks like they're using the hosted version in the site:
> https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.3/jquery.min.js
If it not bundled then there's no need to mention it in LICENSE.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe
Justin,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
> Looks like the the source bundles may be missing jQuery? It’s mentioned in
> license and needed by bootstrap but I don't see it bundled.
>
Looks like they're using the hosted version in the site:
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/l
+1 (binding)
So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts,
matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE
and LICENSE files, license headers, absence of unexpected binaries.
Since the sources are a complex and there is no build need, I'd reco
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name continues incubating
- good signature and hashes
- LICENSE is missing a couple of things (see below)
- NOTICE is possibly missing NOTICE file from quokka? [2][3]
- Source files have ASF header
- No unexpected binary files in release
- No need to compile
LICENSE i
Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 07/17/2016 06:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
+1 (binding)
Yay!
* Verified SHA1 and sig
* DISCLAIMER present
* LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release
* Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run
(maybe I missed them?)
+1
There's a few files that need headers on them, in addition to what Josh
brought up.
- aaa_examples/README.md
- configs/*
- tools/* uses inconsistent headers
John
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 5:08 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hello IPMC and lurkers,
> This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incu
On 07/17/2016 06:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
Yay!
>
> * Verified SHA1 and sig
> * DISCLAIMER present
> * LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release
> * Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run
> (maybe I missed them?)
Pony Mail is
+1 (binding)
* Verified SHA1 and sig
* DISCLAIMER present
* LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release
* Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run
(maybe I missed them?)
* Verified commit ID in repo
Things to fix for your next release (I don't
I should note that this vote will run for 72 hours.
Also, it currently carries one binding IPMC vote (me).
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/17/2016 11:08 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hello IPMC and lurkers,
> This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
>
> Podling vote thread
Hello IPMC and lurkers,
This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
Podling vote thread is at:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9fd77b14753bbde462bea06fc2e1c03d5cf5a89cea2fabd6751d805a@%3Cdev.ponymail.apache.org%3E
The release artefact can be found at:
https://dist
12 matches
Mail list logo
