Hi all,
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
release, with four +1 votes from IPMC members (Yuan Zhuang, Rong Fan,
Rundong Zhou,
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
+1
I have done the following checks.
- DISCLAIMER is OK.
- LICENSE and NOTICE are OK.
- Code compiled successfully, despite some warnings on unused variables.
- All test cases passed.
Best,
Zhaofeng
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:57 AM Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling t
+1
Thanks
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with f
+1
Thanks!
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
+1
On 2021/11/29 18:56:49 Mingshen Sun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the second release of
> Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.2.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> The Apache Teaclave (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release, with four +1 v
Hi,
Sorry but -1 (binding) due to incompatible licenses in source release and those
licenses not mentioned. A WIP disclaimer isn’t a blanket exception and you need
to note what the issues are and inform the used of what licenses are
incompatible. Please see [4]
When voting on releases, it’s al
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the careful screening.
Basically, there are two issues in the release tar bar:
1. We are using a customized Rust's standard library and include
modified sources and other upstream code in our codebase.
2. We also include code of OP-TEE libraries as our vendored
third-par
Hi,
> Basically, there are two issues in the release tar bar:
> 1. We are using a customized Rust's standard library and include
> modified sources and other upstream code in our codebase.
> 2. We also include code of OP-TEE libraries as our vendored
> third-party libraries.
>
> These two codeb
Hi all,
The vote for releasing Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating)
v0.2.0-rc.1 is closed.
We received 7(+1) non-binding votes and 1(-1) binding vote.
Since there are some issues about license review, we will work on this
and prepare for the second release candidate later. Thanks!
Mingshe
13 matches
Mail list logo
