Presumably this means the vote is cancelled, because the ZIP being voted
on hasn't been updated?
Also...
1. as I understand it, notices and licenses for 3rd party products
should not go in NOTICE and LICENSE, but should go in DEPENDENCIES.
This can be generated automatically using
Thanks, BTW, if adding CDDL license and notice is enough to release,
I'd like to do at the moment. Because we're trying to release monthly,
and maven pom can be improved next time.
I'm going to upload RC3 again.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
Presumably
Hi Edward...
In that case would you please cancel this [VOTE] thread and start a
new one. Notice that when producing the RC3 you would have to start a
[VOTE] thread on your dev@ first and when passed you start a [VOTE]
again here in general@.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Edward J. Yoon
This VOTE is canceled.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Edward...
In that case would you please cancel this [VOTE] thread and start a
new one. Notice that when producing the RC3 you would have to start a
[VOTE] thread on your dev@ first
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
(Apologies if I've missed any changes in Apache policy - please jump
in and correct me)
1. as I understand it, notices and licenses for 3rd party products should
not go in NOTICE and LICENSE, but should go in
On 06/07/2011 11:57, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
(Apologies if I've missed any changes in Apache policy - please jump
in and correct me)
Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with
[2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that
no-one on
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with
[2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that
no-one on the legal team updated [1] to reflect new policy.
I think
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with
[2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it
Hi Edward,
I found an issue which is a blocker IMO: jsp-2.1-6.1.4.jar and
jsp-api-2.1-6.1.4.jar from Jetty are included. To my knowlege they are
licensed under CDDL*. This is a Category B [4] license so either
- add the license [1] and the notice excerp [2] to the Hama LICENSE
and NOTICE files or
Hi, Stefan
Thanks for your review. I've added CDDLv1.0 license and notice.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.3/NOTICE.txt
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.3/LICENSE.txt
Could you please check the files again?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:57
Please review this release candidate!
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache Hama community voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2). This release contains performance
improvements and new features
Hi all,
The Apache Hama community voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2). This release contains performance
improvements and new features e.g., maven build, web UI for Hama
cluster, MessageBundle, Dijkstra's Shortest Path and PageRank
examples.
Please vote
12 matches
Mail list logo
