I missed antelders +1 vote and only noticed this today via this link:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MRUnit-version-0.8.0-incubating-td33113645.html
As such, the vote passes with:
4 +1 Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder, Brock Noland
0 -1
Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder are all members
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:
Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member. Is there a list
somewhere? I bothered Tom White last time so I'd prefer to bother
Looks good to me, +1
...ant
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
OK, I switch my
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:
Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member. Is there
Hi Brock,
I'm -1 on this release.
checksums check out:
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.sha1 mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.md5
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.asc mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip
OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% curl -O
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/mrunit/KEYS
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
In this case the files are exactly the
On 11 January 2012 18:44, Patrick Hunt phu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
better/easier?
I checkout the SVN tag and explode the archive(s) in the same parent
directory, and then use a
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
better/easier?
I checkout the SVN tag and
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +, sebb wrote:
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
manually diff against the artifact, or some
On 12 January 2012 12:35, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +, sebb wrote:
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
How is this most easily accomplished?
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
(one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release
artifact. You could then create
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
(one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
other projects. Typically you
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
(one archived with tar/gz the other with
On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
It's a bit odd to me that there are two source
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting upon
On 9 January 2012 23:52, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359
*** Please download, test and
Hi Sebb,
There have indeed been some changes. This is something that IMHO
can be updated on the next release. I've filed a JIRA issue to track it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-52
And will fix it.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 10, 2012, at 6:06 PM, sebb wrote:
On 9 January 2012
19 matches
Mail list logo
