Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

2010-12-03 Thread Kevan Miller
Hi Luciano, Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I think... Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war First, note how there are redundant license files in

Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

2010-12-03 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Luciano, Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I think... Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. I don't like the licensing information in

[VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

2010-11-28 Thread Luciano Resende
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval to publish the release. Please review and vote on approving the M3-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. The artifacts are available for review at: