We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
this new version.
The candidate
+1 from me (binding)
-- dims
On 5/25/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like
Looks OK to me. +1
On May 25, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/
gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request
+1 (binding)
Paul
On 5/26/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks OK to me. +1
On May 25, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.o
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
this new
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request approval from the Incubator PM
On 5/30/06, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just noticed this distribution redistributes (unmodified?)the MPL 1.1
licensed Rhino JavaScript engine. MPL
1.1 is significantly more restrictive than the AL 2. Is this a concern?
MPL1.1 is on Chris's list as a "Class B" license which A
+1 (binding)
On 5/26/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request approv
+1 (binding)
On 5/31/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 5/26/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.c
