On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:44 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. I feel like that's a
> lot. Anyone else have any concerns with so many podlings?
I really encourage everybody to read the feedback on the last year's attempt
..@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 05:48
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 54 podlings - too many?
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about recommending that it be adopted b
behalf of Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 5:47 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 54 podlings - too many?
>O
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Harbs wrote:
> What about recommending that it be adopted by OpenOffice?
>
> IIUC, ODF Toolkit predates OpenOffice becoming an Apache Project. It seems
> (to an outsider like me) like the OpenOffice community would be a good home
> for a
What about recommending that it be adopted by OpenOffice?
IIUC, ODF Toolkit predates OpenOffice becoming an Apache Project. It seems (to
an outsider like me) like the OpenOffice community would be a good home for a
related toolkit.
Harbs
On Mar 28, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Sam Ruby
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
> >
> > https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age
> >
> > It
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator.
>
> A more use stat would perhaps to see:
> a) How long they have been in incubation?
> b) How many releases have they made?
>
> May be easier to then target one
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
>
> https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age
>
> It also gives a clean dashboard to display who the mentors are, etc. Is it
> possible we
Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age
It also gives a clean dashboard to display who the mentors are, etc. Is it
possible we can have the mentors of each project give this feedback in an
objective manner?
John
On
> Am 28.03.2016 um 07:59 schrieb Jean-Baptiste
Add
> Onofré :
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Justin.
>
> Maybe, we should do kind of audit:
> - are the podlings actually active (commits, messages on the mailing list,
> releases, etc) ?
> - for how long are they in the incubator
Hi,
I agree with Justin.
Maybe, we should do kind of audit:
- are the podlings actually active (commits, messages on the mailing
list, releases, etc) ?
- for how long are they in the incubator ?
- how far are they from graduation ?
We can spread this work with "buckets" assigned to volunteer
Hi,
> We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator.
A more use stat would perhaps to see:
a) How long they have been in incubation?
b) How many releases have they made?
May be easier to then target one that should graduate or perhaps retire?
Thanks,
Justin
I think it's a lot, but shouldn't be a worry as long as mentors are keeping up,
right? And that the incubator report manager isn't overburdened. ;)
There's also the topic of shepherds. I seem to recall a sentiment to the effect
that incubator shepherds weren't adding value (from whom, I forget
All,
We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. I feel like that's a
lot. Anyone else have any concerns with so many podlings?
John
15 matches
Mail list logo