On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
>>> [...]
>>> Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the "deep archive".
>>> Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data.
>>>
>>
>> Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area archive.a
Hi Niall,
>> [...]
>> Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the "deep archive".
>> Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data.
>>
>
> Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area archive.apache.org is
> the archive.
I respectfully disagree.
Cheers,
Chris
>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
>
>>
>> "dist" is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download
>> they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people
>> downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific
>> artifact
>
> "dist" is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download
> they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people
> downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific
> artifacts in the dist area - they should be linking to a download page
> where
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:56 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>
>> Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>> Hmmm,
>>>
>>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
>>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e
will do, I know Joe S. lurks here -- Joe -- do you get what I'm saying? Am I
crazy? (don't answer that) ^_^
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:08 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> I am just following current ASF practice.
>
> I agree with the importance of preserving archives
> and reliable links to past resource
I am just following current ASF practice.
I agree with the importance of preserving archives
and reliable links to past resources.
Please take this up with ASF Infrastructure.
This Incubator forum has too narrow scope.
By the way, unrelated to my orginal post,
ASF Infra is currently preparing to
On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:56 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>> Hmmm,
>>
>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
>> that point users to our Incubator relea
Hi Sebb,
>> Hmmm,
>>
>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
>> that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
>> links. I realize that archive.apach
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
> that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
> links. I realize th
On 3 March 2011 03:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
> that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
links. I realize that archive.apache.org keeps a copy, but foll
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>> For Shiro (which is now a TLP), I just moved the artifacts out of
>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro and then deleted the shiro
>> directory.
>
> Remember that stuff is automatically copied to archives:
> http://archive.apache.org/d
Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> For Shiro (which is now a TLP), I just moved the artifacts out of
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro and then deleted the shiro
> directory.
Remember that stuff is automatically copied to archives:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro/
http://archive.apa
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:39 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>
> For example many still have remains on the "distribution" mirrors.
>
> We know that some projects have only recently graduated, so will
> not yet have done a release as a TLP. Therefore your old release
> needs to stay there until that hap
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:39 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Would these projects please tidy up, following your graduation from
> the Incubator.
>
> abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima
>
> For example many still have remains on the "distributio
Would these projects please tidy up, following your graduation from
the Incubator.
abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima
For example many still have remains on the "distribution" mirrors.
We know that some projects have only recently graduated, so will
no
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Is Buildr an Incubating project, or has been?? Not seen on
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html nor the Reporting
> Schedule, but shows up in Jira under the Incubator category.
Guessing the URL, gives:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/buildr.htm
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> it graduated ages ago. I just created a category for it in JIRA and assigned
> it.
>
Excellent.
Thanks
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; ht
it graduated ages ago. I just created a category for it in JIRA and
assigned it.
On 14/10/2009, at 3:29 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Is Buildr an Incubating project, or has been?? Not seen on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html nor the Reporting
Schedule, but shows up in Jira under
Is Buildr an Incubating project, or has been?? Not seen on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html nor the Reporting
Schedule, but shows up in Jira under the Incubator category.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http
html,
>> as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
>> Buildr is not listed in projects on www.apache.org, Abdera is listed there.
>> And neither have updated their STATUS pages to reflect the graduation.
>
> You know, I was going to leave it at a nice "patche
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
> >
> > I've spent more time than I actually have right now updating
> > the 9 million little things that have to get done when Abdera
> > graduated
>
> > The entire process of going through incubation with Abdera has been a
> > giant pain in my ass
>
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I've spent more time than I actually have right now updating
> the 9 million little things that have to get done when Abdera
> graduated
> The entire process of going through incubation with Abdera has been a
> giant pain in my ass
> Have fun with your overly complex rule
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> For what it's worth, I fixed the damn site, that wasn't what I was
> pissed about. What I'm pissed about is that apparently the "right"
> way to deal with a task that hasn't been done is to post a rant to a
> widely read mailing list saying that the mentors of the project
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> Wow, this reminds me of the moments when I ask my children to clean up
> the mess they created when happily playing.
> And I get very grumpy when _I_ am the one who cleans up in the end,
> because I some other stuff to do, too. But hey -
>>> Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html,
>>> as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
>>> Buildr is not listed in projects on www.apache.org, Abdera is listed there.
>>> And neither have updated their STATUS pages
html,
>> as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
>> Buildr is not listed in projects on www.apache.org, Abdera is listed there.
>> And neither have updated their STATUS pages to reflect the graduation.
>
> You know, I was going to leave it at a nice "patche
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Gang,
> I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'.
> Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html,
> as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Gang,
> I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'.
> Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html,
> as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
>
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Gang,
> I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'.
> Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html,
> as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
> Buildr is not listed in projects on
Gang,
I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'.
Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html,
as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
Buildr is not listed in projects on www.apache.org, Abdera is listed there.
And ne
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 08:34 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Please add your reports at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
Sorry, for the delay. We just added the report.
salu2
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please add your reports at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
Buildr report added, sorry for the delay.
Assaf
&
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
> seems be on December.
I just removed;
* Hama (June - Aug)
from the "Monthly" section.
Mentors: You need to get better at this!
Cheers
Niclas
---
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
seems be on December.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
>
> [1]
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008#head-0e5d39e727acbd
I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
[1]
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008#head-0e5d39e727acbdf47dc06f1dbb0fd2b00e109b86
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>> Nope, JSecurity reported from July to O
Craig L Russell wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
The info has been updated since then.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
-
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three month
> schedule.
>
> This reminder was generated from out-of-date info
which is a good trigger for updating said info ;-)
-Bertrand
--
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
Craig
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Novem
l K's vote is binding, but that doesn't change the outcome.
> >
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > The vote to approve the graduation of Build
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually Daniel K's vote is binding, but that doesn't change the outcome.
>
> Congratulations!
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The vote to approve the graduation
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under "monthly" at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
> the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under "monthly" at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, but you're righ
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm..
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually Daniel K's vote is binding, but that doesn't change the outcome.
Congratulations!
Paul
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The vote to approve the graduation of Buildr as a top-level project has now
> ended with 13 +1 votes
The vote to approve the graduation of Buildr as a top-level project has now
ended with 13 +1 votes (incl. 8 binding) and no other votes.
Binding:
* Martijn Dashorst
* Bertrand Delacrétaz
* Paul Fremantle
* Jim Jagielski
* Gianugo Rabellino
* Matthieu Riou
* Craig L. Russell
* Yoav Shapira
Non
+1
Craig
On Nov 6, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
Hi,
The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator as a
top-level project. We've recently held a
vote<http://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE--Graduation-Board-Resolution-td1347057.html
>to
gauge the support of th
[X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
Dan
On Thursday 06 November 2008 12:03:45 pm Alex Boisvert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator as a
> top-level project. We've recently held a
> vote<htt
+1 it is great project
Carl.
Luciano Resende wrote:
[X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
(non-binding)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Niklas Gustavsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
[X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
(non-binding)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Niklas Gustavsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr a
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
Non binding.
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
On Nov 6, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
Hi,
The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator as a
top-level project. We've recently held a
vote<http://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE--Graduation-Board-Resolution-td1347057.html
>to
gauge the support of the co
H Matthieu,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> ...I have one request though: could the Buildr team add a "who we are" or
>> simi
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > [X ] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
>
> +1
>
> I have one request thou
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X ] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
+1
I have one request though: could the Buildr team add a "who we are" or
similar page to the project's site, listing the committers
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on approving the graduation of Buildr. This vote is open for the
> next 72 hours and only votes from Incubator PMC members are binding.
>
> [ ] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level
+1 Good luck!
Martijn
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator as a
> top-level project. We've recently held a
> vote<http://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE--Graduati
+1 from me as well.
Erik
On Nov 6, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Alex Boisvert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator
as a
top-level project. We've recently held a
[ X ]
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator as a
> top-level project. We've recently held a
>
> [ X ] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
> [ ]
+1 from me! Good luck folks!
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubat
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator as a
> top-level project. We've recently held a
> vote<
> http://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE--Graduation-Board-Resoluti
Hi,
The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator as a
top-level project. We've recently held a
vote<http://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE--Graduation-Board-Resolution-td1347057.html>to
gauge the support of the community and feedback was all positive. The
project meets al
Dear incubator overseers,
The Buildr project has been working on a draft board resolution to graduate
from the incubator. We've recently held a
vote<http://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE--Graduation-Board-Resolution-td1347057.html>to
gauge the support of the community and feedback was all pos
Hi,
A short notification to let you know that Buildr is starting a PPMC vote for
graduation. Expect an IPMC vote next week. Feel free to ask here or on
buildr-dev if you have early comments or questions.
Thanks,
Matthieu
Who are those 3 people, etc.
Sorry. IPMC votes counted for:
Jim Jagielsk
Matthieu Riou
Yoav Shapira
Assaf
>
> -Bertrand
>
>>
>> Assaf
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2
, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
>> the PPMC with +6 (+7 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200810.mbox/[EMAIL
>>
Passed with +3 (binding votes were cast on the PPMC mailing list)
Assaf
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
> the PPMC with +6 (+7 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
>
Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
the PPMC with +6 (+7 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200810.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
Passed with +3 and no -1.
Assaf
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
> the PPMC with +3 (+5 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/
>Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
>the PPMC with +3 (+5 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
>
>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200807.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
>
>
>We're voting on the source distri
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:18 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks ok to me so +1.
> >
> > Would be helpful to include a RAT report with the request, but I ran it
> > myself and it didn't highlight any issues.
>
t;
> ...ant
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
>> the PPMC with +3 (+5 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
>>
>>
>> htt
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release.
The source package and the gem both look good to me. As Ant mentioned, the
disclaimer in the pdf would be nice to have.
+1
Matthieu
> The release vote passed withi
pache License text.
...ant
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
> the PPMC with +3 (+5 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org
Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release. The release vote passed within
the PPMC with +3 (+5 including non-binding votes) and no -1:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200807.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
3 +1 votes here, one addition +1 PPMC on buildr-dev for a total of +4
to get this release out.
Assaf
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This release is primarily to solve the installation problem on Windows
> due to unspecific dependency on
ase is primarily to solve the installation problem on Windows
>>> due to unspecific dependency on RJB. Other changes and solved issues
>>> in this release are listed below.
>>>
>>> The release vote passed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
>>>
>>>
ther changes and solved issues
>> in this release are listed below.
>>
>> The release vote passed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]
>>
>> We're voting on
elease vote passed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
>
> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.1/distro/
>
> Specifically:
>
RJB. Other changes and solved issues
> > in this release are listed below.
> >
> > The release vote passed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> &g
> This release is primarily to solve the installation problem on Windows due to
> unspecific dependency on RJB. Other changes and solved issues in this release
> are listed below.
>
> The release vote passed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbo
> This release is primarily to solve the installation problem on Windows due to
> unspecific dependency on RJB. Other changes and solved issues in this release
> are listed below.
>
> The release vote passed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbo
assed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
>
> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.1/distro/<http://people.apache.org/%
This release is primarily to solve the installation problem on Windows
due to unspecific dependency on RJB. Other changes and solved issues
in this release are listed below.
The release vote passed within the PPMC with 3 +1:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200805
Counting IPMC members who voted here and on buildr-dev, we have three +1 and
no -1.
Time to make that release.
Assaf
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> &g
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the much-anticipated Buildr 1.3 release, the first official
> Apache release of the Buildr project.
Already voted on buildr-dev but a confirmation never hurts: a big +1.
Matthieu
>
>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the much-anticipated Buildr 1.3 release, the first official
> Apache release of the Buildr project.
+1.
Yoav
-
To unsubsc
Up for vote, the much-anticipated Buildr 1.3 release, the first official
Apache release of the Buildr project.
The release vote passed within the PPMC with 6 +1:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
We're voting to make a release bas
On Nov 27, 2007 2:56 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No reply... Should I take that back to legal-discuss? I would like to be
> sure that warnings about the Ruby license in the NOTICE file would be
> considered enough by the IPMC though.
i'm not a fan of the ruby license but i haven
No reply... Should I take that back to legal-discuss? I would like to be
sure that warnings about the Ruby license in the NOTICE file would be
considered enough by the IPMC though.
Thanks,
Matthieu
On Nov 20, 2007 3:28 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The
Hi,
The Buildr podling which entered incubation recently needs to address the
problem of releasing Ruby code under the ASF. There are basically two
questions that we'll need to answer before being able to do any release:
1. As most Ruby libraries reuse the Ruby license [1], in which cat
Forgot to change the mail subject to [RESULT], posting again for the benefit
of filters and archives.
Thanks,
Matthieu
On Nov 1, 2007 1:17 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With 18 positive votes including 14 binding votes and no -1, Buildr is
> accept
Hi,
With 18 positive votes including 14 binding votes and no -1, Buildr is
accepted as an Incubator project. +1 votes were registered from:
Martijn Dashorst
Eelco Hillenius
Noel J. Bergman
Niclas Hedhman
Yoav Shapira
Stefan Bodewig
Bertrand Delacretaz
Gilles Scokart
Erik Hatcher
Jim Jagielski
Matthieu Riou wrote:
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
incubate Buildr.
+1
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
On 30/10/2007, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
> incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
> projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake
+1
...ant
On 10/29/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote
> to
> incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
> projects written in Ruby (an
+1, Buildr is excellent stuff.
/niklas
Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
pro
+1
It will be nice to see some Ruby development here.
Craig
On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for
a vote to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for
Java
projects writt
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
