On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes st...@apache.org wrote:
Not sure if this is too late..
I added the Taverna's completed Name Search under the Legal /
Trademarks summary.
That's fine -- it's not a controversial item.
I didn't add Taverna under IP Clearance - although it's
Not sure if this is too late..
I added the Taverna's completed Name Search under the Legal /
Trademarks summary.
I didn't add Taverna under IP Clearance - although it's been sent to
secretary@, it's not been confirmed by the secretary - probably
something fell over with email + attachments +
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
It's my understanding that Droids is basically a mature product with no
pressing need for further development, not unlike some dormant Apache TLPs who
neverthess still have PMC members hanging around able to make
Hi,
I can reply about SAMOA.
We want to create bylaws because the default voting process for code
changes in Apache is too strict for us (3 +1 binding votes).
Being a small community, we felt that we needed a lower bar to move faster.
My understanding is that we need bylaws to specify that, but
On 10 February 2015 at 11:44, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
g...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I can reply about SAMOA.
We want to create bylaws because the default voting process for code
changes in Apache is too strict for us (3 +1 binding votes).
Being a small community, we felt that we needed
Hi,
When reviewing the podling (as a shepherd) I at first allso though it odd,
however they have looked into what other projects are doing and are using RTC
not CTR. The discussion (as I understand it) is about accepting non committer
code not all code changes. This is the relevant thread [1]
+1 to jan's comments
Ideally you should not be carrying out votes for code changes unless you
can't progress without it. In some Apache projects I've participated in I
don't think we've ever held a formal vote on code changes. It's fairly
common to informally use +1/0/-1 to expression opinions
Incubator PMC report for February 2015
The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
narrative
* Community
New IPMC members:
People who left the IPMC:
Mentors who didn't sign off on the reports:
Hi Marvin,
My apologies for being a day late with my Shepherd reports. Nifi was included
below, but I saved REEF’s shepherd report a few minutes after you sent this.
-Taylor
On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:30 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Incubator PMC report for February 2015
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for being a day late with my Shepherd reports. Nifi was
included below, but I saved REEF’s shepherd report a few minutes after you
sent this.
Thanks for putting in the effort! So long as the REEF podling
Hello, Incubator community,
As discussed in a recent thread on Mentoring, the draft report email provides
an opportunity for cross-cutting feedback. So here goes!
The top-level report was not yet complete when the draft was sent out (and
what sections were there I wrote), so I have nothing to
11 matches
Mail list logo
