What ever happened to Etch?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
What is preventing Etch from graduating?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates.
In particular, we are looking for an interested Champion.
We welcome any and all comments. :-)
--
James Dixson
-proposal-
= Abstract
Etch is a cross-platform, language
> = Etch =
>
> Etch was accepted into Incubator on the 2 September 2008. Since then the
> following items has been completed;
>
> * Project STATUS page, navigation and entry in projects/index.html has
> been set up.
> * Mailing lists has been set up.
> * J
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> What ever happened to Etch?
Live and well, although http://incubator.apache.org/etch has not been
populated yet. ATM, stuff gets written to
http://cwiki.apache.org/ETCH/
Was it something else in particular you were thinking of?
F
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>> What ever happened to Etch?
>
> Live and well, although http://incubator.apache.org/etch has not been
> populated yet. ATM, stuff gets written to
> http://
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Pointing http://incubator.apache.org/etch to an auto exported version
> of the wiki should be easy, and there is some documentation embedded
> in the following page [1], please let me know if you need help.
>
> [1] http://c
One of the committers, Rene, is working on this.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
>> Pointing http://incubator.apache.org/etch to an auto exported version
>> of the wiki should be easy,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> What is preventing Etch from graduating?
A diverse, active, growing community and building releases.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
.
regards
Michael
2011/6/14 Martijn Dashorst :
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> What is preventing Etch from graduating?
>
> A diverse, active, growing community and building releas
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
and binding libraries for a variety of programming languages. It
currently supports C, C# and Java
On Friday 01 August 2008 00:16, James Dixson wrote:
> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates.
>
> In particular, we are looking for an interested Champion.
Well, you are expected to have found a Ch
You adressed the two concerns that I have, too, thanks.
- The name. "Debian Etch" is a deeply engrained meme with the "Etch"
short cut.
- Office disussions. Projects where a large number of committers are
from the same organization and that also have this company being
inv
ssed the two concerns that I have, too, thanks.
>
> - The name. "Debian Etch" is a deeply engrained meme with the "Etch"
> short cut.
>
> - Office disussions. Projects where a large number of committers are
> from the same organization and that also have this
I am a bit confused though about the "too good" concern, I do not think I
understand what you mean. Could you elaborate?
--
james
On 7/31/08 10:28 PM, "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 August 2008 00:16, James Dixson wrote:
>> This a prop
On Friday 01 August 2008 21:10, James Dixson wrote:
> I am a bit confused though about the "too good" concern, I do not think I
> understand what you mean. Could you elaborate?
I think it was Stefano Mazzocchi who said about community building, that the
only "Bad Code + Great Vision" will succeed
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:16 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
James, could you perhaps describe how this differs from Thrift?
-Yonik
-
To unsubscrib
Ah. Well, then I do not think there is anything to worry about as far as
Etch is concerned. There are many, many potential growth points for the
project. A simple example, Etch supports Java and C# language bindings today
with a binary-transport. One of the committers, Seth Call, is working on a
The watercooler problem is real, but addressable. We accept that in order
for a community around Etch to grow, communication has to be open. Much of
our communication and discussion about Etch has been mediated over email as
our intramural community is geographically distributed. It is not a
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 14 people from one organisation on the initial committer list looks to
> me like a daunting incubation.
Indeed. Which of those people will actually be working on Etch going forward?
A quick perusal shows a M
ers--one that we've fostered and grown on our own
accord here at Cisco. You can see it here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cuae-dev/
Again, I realize it isn't the same, but I wanted to make sure the
Incubator community knows that the folks who are bringing Etch to Apache
nd every one of them, blah,
blah. in the end, it was all too much.
i actually had a fully functional basic etch framework put together (hand built
code) when i first checked out thrift (eh, march 2007?). etch was was good
enough to be able to compare the two. the comparison was favorable enou
with Etch.
When we were discussing amongst ourselves who to include in the proposal, we
tried to apply the same criteria regarding merit that we would need to apply
if we were already an apache project.
All of the folks on the list are folks that have been consistently active in
Etch development
l
start listing your inaccuracies.
Paul
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:16 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates.
>
> In particular, we are looking for an intere
James Dixson wrote:
This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
+1 for incubation.
I will gladly be a mentor.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
full time on the etch project, everyone
else has other duties as well. there is plenty of room for more
contributors on current and future projects:
ruby binding
python binding
web services gateway
web services transport
maven build
automated interop test framework and suite
better testing
Paul,
Are you referring to the "SOAP/Web Services offer an interesting comparison
..." paragraph?
If so, then I agree it is probably redundant to the Etch rationale and I can
remove it.
--
james
On 8/1/08 12:34 PM, "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Yes that was the paragraph I was referring to.
Paul
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:29 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Are you referring to the "SOAP/Web Services offer an interesting comparison
> ..." paragraph?
>
> If so, then I agree it
2008 at 12:16 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates.
>
> In particular, we are looking for an interested Champion.
>
the ASF, and I have a personal interest in perhaps using
> it for Solr 2.0.
>
> I'll certainly volunteer to be a Mentor.
>
> -Yonik
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:16 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:23 PM, scott comer (sccomer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we might have overdone the committer list here a bit so nobody who made a
> significant contribution felt left out. :-)
Perhaps something like a FAQ entry "What is the history of Etch?" on
t
On 8/1/08, scott comer (sccomer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we might have overdone the committer list here a bit so nobody who made
> a significant contribution felt left out. :-)
Having a long committer list is not necessarily bad but projects which
enter with a long list of which only a small
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:16 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates.
+1 for incubation (non-binding). While I find this area to be a bit
overcrowded lately, h
I have heard the name concern a couple of times now...
When we picked the name Etch about 18 months ago, we knew about the
Debian release, but frankly we were unconcerned. Debian etch is the name
of a release of Debian, no different than "4" being a release of Fedora.
Eventually Debian
Call it "Edge". :-)
My concern is mainly "2". And you will get lots of Linux support
questions on your mailing list.
Ciao
Henning
James Dixson (jadixson) schrieb:
I have heard the name concern a couple of times now...
When we picked the name
Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
>>
>> See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates.
>
> +1 for incubation (non-binding). While I find this area to be a bit
> overcrowded lately, having both Etch an
in.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:16 PM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
>>>
&
.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: James Dixson (jadixson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 6:03:28 PM
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Etch
>
> I have heard the name concern a couple of times now...
>
&g
A modern replacement for CORBA? Just resist the temptation to
implement Persistence Services on top. ;-)
+1
Craig
On Jul 31, 2008, at 9:16 AM, James Dixson wrote:
This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates.
In
On Friday 01 August 2008 00:16:57 James Dixson wrote:
> == Nominated Mentors
Now;
Niclas Hedhman
Doug Cutting
Paul Fremantle
I had to remove Yonik from the list of formal Mentors, as he is not on the
Incubator PMC (AFAICT). Paul Fremantle has volunteered, so I put him up as
well.
A
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now;
> Niclas Hedhman
> Doug Cutting
> Paul Fremantle
>
> I had to remove Yonik from the list of formal Mentors, as he is not on the
> Incubator PMC (AFAICT).
Huh? Mentors become part of the Incubator PMC.
"The Sp
On Thursday 07 August 2008 10:50:10 Yonik Seeley wrote:
> "The Sponsor shall assign a Mentor, who shall be granted membership of
> the Incubator PMC for the duration of the incubation process."
> That's also why they are listed as Nominated Members... the Incubator
> PMC must confirm them.
Yes, b
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 August 2008 10:50:10 Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> "The Sponsor shall assign a Mentor, who shall be granted membership of
>> the Incubator PMC for the duration of the incubation process."
>> That's also why they
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 07 August 2008 10:50:10 Yonik Seeley wrote:
"The Sponsor shall assign a Mentor, who shall be granted membership of
the Incubator PMC for the duration of the incubation process."
That's al
On Thursday 07 August 2008 12:16:47 Yonik Seeley wrote:
> And I also qualify on that point.
Then I am so sorry. As Bill pointed out, it ain't easy to recall exactly who
are Members and who are not...
I will adjust the Proposal.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http:/
On Thursday 07 August 2008 12:16:47 Yonik Seeley wrote:
> And I also qualify on that point.
Then I am so sorry. As Bill pointed out, it ain't easy to recall exactly who
are Members and who are not...
I will adjust the Proposal.
Paul, do you still want to be Mentor??
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman,
Niclas
I offered as a backup. I'm perfectly happy for the proposal to go
forwards with the three original mentors. I will probably join the
mailing lists anyway.
Thanks!
Paul
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 August 2008 12:16:47 Yonik Se
On Thursday 07 August 2008 14:33:57 Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Niclas
>
> I offered as a backup. I'm perfectly happy for the proposal to go
> forwards with the three original mentors. I will probably join the
> mailing lists anyway.
Ok, noted in proposal.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Develop
Folks,
Can I ask if anyone has compared Etch with Apache Tuscany and the SCA
specifications?
Yours, Mike.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From my understanding, Tuscany could leverage Etch to offer a wire
format that can be consumed by a variety of different languages and
environments, not a contestant to it.
Ciao
Henning
Mike Edwards schrieb:
Folks,
Can I ask if anyone has compared Etch with Apache
Henning,
I'd be grateful if you could explain this further.
When I look at the Etch proposal page, it does not seem that Etch is simply about a wire format, so
I am puzzled by your reply. There are some things I'm clearly not getting about Etch.
Yours, Mike.
Henning Schmiedeha
Doug is a wise man and that is how we picked the name etch 18 month ago.
Scott out
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:12 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject:Re
Hey, I was apple's rep to the omg for awhile and a member of the persistent
comittee. As the etch architect, that experience has informed my every move.
Keep it simple, make it fast.
Scott out
>From the monterey bay aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Craig L Russell
http://www.google.com/search?&q=etch -- 12MM hits for an unreleased
product (this Etch)
http://www.google.com/search?&q=hadoop -- < 600K hits for a product that's been
out for over a year
Why such resistance to name change? There is this proverb that might be
suitable
Simple put: a name change is work. Before I can accept the need to do
work, I want to clearly understand the benefits of doing it.
Etch, while new to open-source, does have some awareness in a technical
community ( http://developer.cisco.com/web/cuae ). We have been publicly
pitching and
On Aug 8, 2008, at 4:28 AM, James Dixson (jadixson) wrote:
Simple put: a name change is work. Before I can accept the need to do
work, I want to clearly understand the benefits of doing it.
Etch, while new to open-source, does have some awareness in a
technical
community ( http
Etch, it's just that it's an English word, plus there are
several other products with "Etch" in their name.
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, August 8, 2008 6:28:23 AM
> S
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:23 PM, scott comer (sccomer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we might have overdone the committer list here a bit so nobody who made a
> significant contribution felt left out. :-)...
> ...summary:
>
> architecture: scott comer
> compiler, java and csharp binding: scott comer
as a scientist, i am getting somewhat bristly at all the rumor,
innuendo, and hyperbole around names. i've not seen any definitive or
measurable steps that can be take to ensure success. we're also ignoring
the silent majority which seems to like etch just fine. my personal
opinion i
ccess. we're also
ignoring the silent majority which seems to like etch just fine. my
personal opinion is that the name is not the gating factor for
success. apache pig? really. success and web hits will derive from
being truly useful and trusted. it doesn't work the other way a
+1 to Scott's comments.
I don't think the name is a significant conflict at all. Debian Etch is a
release codename - regular references to it will fade away as the next
release surfaces, and the Apache Etch name, if it is a successful project,
should last much longer. This woul
Scott Comer wrote:
> as a scientist, i am getting somewhat bristly at all the rumor,
> innuendo, and hyperbole around names.
Can you be more specific?
So far the best argument against Etch that I've seen is Grant's, and Les
makes a good point about the transient nature of suc
also ignoring the silent majority
> which seems to like etch just fine. my personal opinion is that the name is
> not the gating factor for success. apache pig? really. success and web hits
> will derive from being truly useful and trusted. it doesn't work the other
> way around.
&
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Scott Comer wrote:
the important thing right now is, i think, that searching now for etch
doesn't not reveal anything which is obviously competing technology
True, but were the debian community to make "a federal case" of the issue, I
don't know th
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Scott Comer wrote:
>>> the important thing right now is, i think, that searching now for etch
>>> doesn't not reveal anything which is obviously competing technology
>> True, but were the debian com
people that mention name (8), only 3 are voting:
henning: concerned about confusion with debian. only says we need to be
careful and explicit.
niall: wants to see the q resolved. likes the name, sees no real objection.
niclas: conflict with debian; only worries about it.
of the rest, most like th
niall: wants to see the q resolved. likes the name, sees no real objection.
niclas: conflict with debian; only worries about it.
of the rest, most like the name etch and seem to be just "tossing the
ball around".
the main other concern is that of confusion with Debian Etch vs. Apache
Et
with debian; only worries about it.
of the rest, most like the name etch and seem to be just "tossing the
ball around".
the main other concern is that of confusion with Debian Etch vs.
Apache Etch. There
was some discussion about whether etch could get to the top of the
google list.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:58 PM, scott comer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> of the people that mention name (8), only 3 are voting:
This is a discussion thread, not a formal vote for Etch to enter the Incubator.
[...]
> so, can we put the name question to bed? it was suggested that
+1
-Yonik
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:23 PM, scott comer (sccomer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> we might have overdone the committer list here a bit so nobody who made a
>> significant contribution felt left out. :-
scott comer wrote:
> in my opinion there isn't [a demand for name change]. certainly
> names is a rich topic and the discussion would never die down on
> it's own because it is so much fun. it's a wonder anything gets done.
You should have been around for the start of Geronimo. :-)
> can we put
es the name, sees no real
objection.
niclas: conflict with debian; only worries about it.
of the rest, most like the name etch and seem to be just "tossing
the ball around".
the main other concern is that of confusion with Debian Etch vs.
Apache Etch. There
was some discussion
did call out in the
proposal itself.
All of the committers listed are active contributors to Etch today. There
have been more contributors in the past and plenty in our circle of friends
here at Cisco that would like to be contributors. But as I mentioned
originally, we culled the list based on
ial committers. Scott and I detailed various contributions explicitly
> and for those we did not callout in this list, we did call out in the
> proposal itself.
>
> All of the committers listed are active contributors to Etch today. There
> have been more contributors in the past and p
It was suggested that the committer list be trimmed to those who will
actually be committing (perhaps the 8 that Scott mentions). Those
suggestions were not even acknowledged. Is there a problem with
trimming the list?
-Yonik
-
I may have missed some of the threads on this, so apologize if this is a
repeat. However, FWIW, I wanted to confirm that Etch isn't registered as a
trademark or service mark with the US PTO for any software product or
service, so there is no direct conflict with names in that venue.
Jen
: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:18 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Etch
It was suggested that the committer list be trimmed to those who will
actually be committing (perhaps the 8 that Scott mentions). Those
suggestions were not even acknowledged. Is there a problem with
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 08:43 -0700, James Dixson (jadixson) wrote:
> There is no problem trimming the list. As I mentioned originally, we
> included in the list all of the most recent active contributors.
>
> The question has been asked of the current contributors over the last
> several days and m
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 08:43 -0700, James Dixson (jadixson) wrote:
>> There is no problem trimming the list. As I mentioned originally, we
>> included in the list all of the most recent active contributors.
>>
>> The question ha
Upayavira wrote:
My expressed concern was to do with the length of the committer list. If
you start with 14 committers, (and they all remain active) you won't be
able to graduate until you reach at least 29 committers - so that there
isn't a predominance from one organisation.
I've always under
be the "public front piece", IMHO, it should be
http://incubator.apache.org/etch that serves that purpose and STATUS
is mainly an Incubator artifact for our process purposes.
As for 'status' being dismysal state, give us a break ;o) We have only
had 5-6 weeks since the VOTE...
Hi everybody,
the Etch community released a new version!
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
framework for building and consuming bidirectional network services.
The Etch toolset includes a network service description
language, a compiler, and binding libraries for
Just as an aside: I intend on staying with the PMC to provide
oversight as a Member (and being a familiar Mentor), provided the Etch
community wants me to tag along.
Martijn
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independ
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
> framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
> toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
> and binding libraries for
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
>> Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
>> framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
>> toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
>>
"incubating" is hampering its attractiveness. It will
> become a swim or sink challenge as TLP, but doubt the forecast is any
> better of staying here.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>>
Hey hey,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Now the big question: is Etch a candidate for graduating to TLP?
>
> I think it is, given the facts. It will be a TLP with issues of
> activity, but so far user questions, development questions are
> answered and r
roject, cut and check releases, apply patches and vote in new
community members. The latter doesn't seem to be a problem, other than
attracting new members.
> What would be really bad for Etch is if the incubator recommends it
> graduates into a TLP and then the board doesn't wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Holger Grandy [mailto:holger.gra...@bmw-carit.de]
> Sent: Friday, 22 October 2010 1:19 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Etch 1.1.0-incubating
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> the Etch community released a new ve
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Gav... wrote:
>> the Etch community released a new version!
> Well Done Etch Team, I know how hard it was for this to come around and how
> close things were to it not happening at all so is especially a great
> achievement.
I echo that!!
Ch
So we had a vote and there were plenty of binding votes for incubation
([VOTE RESULT] ->
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200809.mbox/%3CF7
[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
So now what? Is there supposed to be an acknowledgement by the PMC?
According to the bootstrap section of the
Hello,
the Etch community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache Etch
1.1.
A vote on the etch-dev@ list already resulted in three +1 from Incubator PMC
members:
- Doug Cutting
- Martijn Dashorst
- Gavin McDonald
The proposal for the release was:
http://mail-archives.apache.org
All,
The Etch podling has been in the incubator for about 4 years. It has
seen lots of drama with the departure of the original contributor of
the project. Fortunately a very small, committed team has persevered
and remained quietly in the incubator, committing bits and releasing
the software
I kindly request the current receipts of ICLAs, CCLAs and SGAs for the
Apache Incubator Etch project from someone who are able to check the
records in the private foundation repository. If this information is
protected please send it to etch-priv...@incubator.apache.org
I came to the project
Please vote on accepting Etch into the Incubator.
The Etch proposal is at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal
--
James
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Please go ahead and submit CLA's and CCLA's.
Also, work with your mentors and create the necessary JIRAs to create
the new podling infrastructure resources. See some examples in [1]
Also, item 7 is very important, but looks like Etch is already in the
schedule [2]
[1]
http://issues.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> Please go ahead and submit CLA's and CCLA's.
>
> Also, work with your mentors and create the necessary JIRAs to create
> the new podling infrastructure resources. See some examples in [1]
>
> Also, item 7 is very important, but looks
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:04 AM, James Dixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we had a vote and there were plenty of binding votes for incubation
> ([VOTE RESULT] ->
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200809.mbox/%3CF7
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>
> So now what? Is there sup
Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for
Etch: apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating.
With this release we have updated all of the licensing/headers for the
project to meet Apache standards, fixed a few bugs and validated under
Windows, OS X and Linux (Ubuntu).
Complete
Hi,
I am closing this vote since we got no additional votes in this list
and the 72 hours have passed.
The vote has passed with the three +1 from incubator PMC members, that
already voted on the
etch-dev@ list.
Thanks for your comments on the dev list,
Holger
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:35 PM
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
