Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Kulp write:
a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 [suggests
that]
all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed to RedHat
employees.
I think the
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 03:04, Daniel Kulp wrote:
That all said, I'm NOT on the IPMC. Thus, my thoughts don't really
count other than to provide insight based on MY experiences. I don't
have a binding vote.
But
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Martin Ritchie wrote:
snip
We are
again working as a community to provide a M2.1 release that will inter
operate at AMQP 0-9 with other AMQP products outside the Apache world.
I for one am
Scott Deboy wrote:
Does ASF need proof that a transfer of intellectual property ownership
occurred?
In your CLA - you attest that you have that right. If you don't - it's
on you to remedy it. The ASF doesn't broker relationships between
developers and their employers, clients, or spouses :)
On Friday 07 March 2008 03:04, Daniel Kulp wrote:
That all said, I'm NOT on the IPMC. Thus, my thoughts don't really
count other than to provide insight based on MY experiences. I don't
have a binding vote.
But your view is highly appreciated.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Kulp write:
a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 [suggests
that]
all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed to RedHat
employees.
I think the above should provide enough information
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Martin Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Kulp write:
a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1
[suggests
that]
all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed
: Thursday, March 06, 2008 10:48 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: (qpid) Diversity
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Martin Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Kulp write:
a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Martin Ritchie wrote:
- Firstly not all work is done on trunk so purely looking at trunk is
not a good metric
That's fair. I forgot about the work on the branches. That's a very
valid point.Updated list with branches added from Jan 1:
Alan ConwayRH
Does ASF need proof that a transfer of intellectual property ownership
occurred?
Scott Deboy
-Original Message-
From: Robert Greig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: (qpid) Diversity
On 06/03/2008, Scott Deboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the qpid folks who don't want to divulge their employer: are they
working on the project as part of their employment? If so, it would
appear we need a CCLA, correct?
I do not believe so since those employees have signed legal documents
All,
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world. They have signed a legal
document, in order to be allowed to contribute to Apache, and thus this is
not a simple preference issue.
Regards,
Marnie
On 3/5/08, Carl Trieloff
On 05/03/2008, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote:
All,
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world.
Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
than as part
Another option would be to not consider the people that cannot disclose
their employers when considering the diversity of the project. If
there are 15 people, and 5 cannot disclose their employer, only consider
the diversity of the remaining people.
Kind of the err on the side of caution
sebb wrote:
On 05/03/2008, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote:
All,
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world.
Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
Marnie McCormack wrote:
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world. They have signed a legal
document, in order to be allowed to contribute to Apache, and thus this is
not a simple preference issue.
Mind you, they are
Roland Weber wrote:
If contributing to the project is part of their job responsibilities,
they should be required to disclose the employer.
That has not been made a stringent requirement, but see my response to
Melanie for what *is* a requirement.
--- Noel
Daniel Kulp write:
a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 [suggests
that]
all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed to RedHat
employees.
I think the above should provide enough information about the health and
diversity of the community that actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
Do they *all* have CCLA's?
- -- dims
Scott Deboy wrote:
| I'm curious what other incubator folks think about qpid's plan for disclosing
the organizational diversity of their
committership/PMC (or if this is even a requirement).
|
| Scott
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
Do they *all* have CCLA's?
absolutely.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
